Home Blog Page 2

EFJ joins call for EU to prioritize rule of law

0

The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) joined 38 other media freedom and civil society organisations on Wednesday in calling on the European Commission to strengthen its fifth annual rule of law report, which assesses media freedom in European Union member states.

With Europe due to vote from June 6 to 9, the 39 groups also called on the new European Commission to prioritize implementation of their recommendations.

“The multiple attacks on press freedom in the European Union highlighted in the latest MFRR report and in the annual report of the Council of Europe Platform must encourage European political decision-makers to put more pressure on national governments,” insists EFJ President Maja Sever. “The alarm signals are multiplying: the refusal of the French government majority to consolidate the independence of editorial offices from media owners, threats to public broadcasting in Italy and Slovakia, the multiplication of slapps without any reaction from governments, and so on. What are governments waiting for to react to these threats to democracy?”

 

Our main recommendations to the European Commission are:

  1. Strengthen the rule of law as a key priority in the next Commission programme
  2. A strong mandate for the new Commissioner for Justice
  3. Better self-assessment of the rule of law effectiveness
  4. Continue the annual rule of law reports and make them more contextual and detailed
  5. Address continuing concerns about civic space
  6. Take firm and systematic action against the non-implementation of court decisions
  7. Protect freedom of expression and information and media freedom
  8. Improve the visibility and awareness of the rule of law report

Read the full joint statement here.

 

Signatories:

  1. ACAT Belgium
  2. ACAT France
  3. ALDA – European Association for Local Democracy
  4. ARTICLE 19
  5. Association of European Journalists (AEJ)
  6. Citizens Network Watchdog Poland
  7. Civil Liberties Union for Europe
  8. Committee to Protect Journalists
  9. Community Media Forum Europe
  10. Democracy Reporting International (DRI)
  11. DEMAS – Association for Democracy Assistance and Human Rights
  12. Demo Finland
  13. Europäischer Austausch / European Exchange
  14. European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
  15. European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  16. European Network Against Racism (ENAR)
  17. European Partnership for Democracy (EPD)
  18. Fédération internationale des ACAT / International Federation of ACAT
  19. Fédération internationale pour les droits humains (FIDH)
  20. Free Press Unlimited
  21. Human Rights and Democracy Network Internal Working Group
  22. Human Rights House Foundation
  23. Human Rights House Zagreb
  24. Human Rights Watch
  25. Hungarian Helsinki Committee
  26. IFEX
  27. ILGA Europe – European region of the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and
    Intersex Association
  28. Initiative for Freedom of Expression – Turkey (IFOX)
  29. International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)
  30. International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network (IPPF EN)
  31. International Press Institute (IPI)
  32. International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT)
  33. Netherlands Helsinki Committee
  34. Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa
  35. Protection International
  36. Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
  37. Society of Journalists
  38. South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)
  39. WACC Europe

Source: EFJ

EFJ calls for immediate and ambitious implementation of the European Media Freedom Act

0

As the final text of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) was formally adopted today by the European Union, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) calls once again on the Member States to be efficient and ambitious in implementing this crucial legislation.

The final green light given to the EMFA by European governments – except Hungary – could not be more timely as the situation is worsening in several EU countries, where public service media are being used politically and weakened financially, instead of guaranteeing citizens independent, plural and quality information as their mission requires.

 

First tests in Slovakia and Italy

The most recent example is Slovakia, where a draft law in discussion foresees the dissolution of Radio and Television of Slovakia (RTVS) to replace it with the new Slovak Television and Radio (STaR). Drastic changes to the appointment and competence of oversight bodies would set up government control and effectively end the public broadcaster’s independence, contradicting Article 5 of the EU’s Media Freedom Act.

In Italy, recent major politically-influenced internal management changes at Radiotelevisione Italiana (RAI) and attempts to shrink even further the financial autonomy of the Italian broadcasting service are another worrying development that the EMFA should prevent.

Article 5(2)) reads: “Member States shall ensure that the procedures for the appointment and the dismissal of the head of management or the members of the management board of public service media providers aim to guarantee the independence of the public service media providers (…) They may be dismissed before the end of their term of office only exceptionally where they no longer fulfil the legally predefined conditions required for the performance of their duties laid down in advance by national law or for specific reasons of illegal conduct or serious misconduct as defined in advance by national law.”

“The acute situations in Slovakia and Italy show the importance of immediate and ambitious application of the EMFA, which is not only aimed at preventing political interference, but also at preventing the weakening of public service media due to a lack of financial sustainability,” said the co-chair of the EFJ Broadcasting Expert Group (BREG), Rolf Johansen.

 

Minimum rules

The EFJ welcomes the introduction of the media pluralism test as a positive step to prevent threats to media plurality and independence from market concentration. It also welcomes better protection of online content produced by news media and journalists from the power of the platforms.

In a nutshell, the EMFA establishes minimum rules for the protection of journalists’ sources, strict guarantees for the independent operation of public service media and their financial viability,  transparency in media ownership and state advertising, as well as editorial independence in newsrooms.

The EFJ and its affiliates will now work to ensure that the EMFA delivers on its promises: to hold governments accountable for ensuring media pluralism and editorial independence across the 27 Member States, and to ensure that journalists are protected from undue political or other influence.

“All these articles could have been stronger but we agree that this is the landmark act at EU level that we have been waiting for about 30 years. Now that the EMFA has been adopted, the real test lies with how this act will be implemented and enforced in the EU Member States. We need both political will at national level, but also from the European Commission and the newly created board to oversee its application,” said EFJ Director Renate Schroeder. “In particular, spying on journalists has no place in our European democracies and must be avoided by all means.”

Source: EFJ

Hasić: Legal certainty and fairer compensation for the use of journalist´articles

0

The proposed draft law on the collective excercise and protection of copyright and related rights should have positive impact as for the journalists and media workers, so as for the BiH society as a whole.

Sarajevo, March 28th,2024.  – Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is in the process of updating law which regulates intellectual property rights ,since through Stabilization and Association agreement it has commited itself to ensure the level of intellectual property protection similar to that of the European Union countries (EU). All these activities are undertaken within the framework of the EU project of support to the intellectual property rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is funded by the EU.

Haris Hasić, an expert on the protection of copyright and related rights, in an interview for the BH journalists says that public consultations are underway on the Draft Amendments to the Existing Law on Copyright and Related Rights (Official Gazzete of BiH no.63/10) and the Draft Law on Collective excercise of copyright and related rights, which is an entirely new law and a substitude to the existing Law on collective excercise of copyright and related rights(Official Gazzete of BiH no.63/10). Hasić points out that BiH has not reformed the legal area on intellectual property since 2010. Although in the meantime serious changes have happened in Europe and world in this area – the EU has adopted more directives,important for the protection of copyright rights and works of journalists and media.

„These two laws are of specific interest for the journalists and media workers because these figures in the framework of their professional obligations create, and also use copyrighted works.The Law on Copyright and Related Rights regulates what is an authors work, who can be considered as an author, what rights does author have in relation to his/hers work, when the authors work can be used without permission of the author and the obligation to pay compensation, court and other procedures for the protection of copyright rights as many other issues. “ says Hasić and adds how journalist and media community in BiH should understand the importance of ,,changes that will be brought in connection with the realization of collective rights, and what will be the role of an non-profit associations for the protection of copyright works and certain groups of authors“.

What is new in these two laws which will regulate protection of copyright and related rights in a new, European way?

Hasić:  As drafts of these laws were made within a framework of the EU project, many of the new provisions are based on new directives, best passed by the EU. This is an excellent approach, since the EU rules are, in principal, one of the best in the world for this area, and Bosnia and Herzegovina is obliged to transpose them into its legislation anyway, if we want to be a member of the EU and fulfill the previously assumed obligations.Thus, for example,the institute of the ,,orphan” of author’s work will be introduced, which will represent the author’s work that is legaly protected, but the author cannot be identified or it is not possible to communicate with the author in order to obtain permission, so the legislator gives permission in certain circumstances to use these works after conducting a thorough search procedure. Qualified use of author’s works is allowed for their use in digital and cross-border teaching, author’s works are unavailable on the market and for text and data mining, including for the purpose of scientific research. The rules that will make it easier for blind and partially sighted persons to access printed works of authorship, which is an obligation undertaken by Bosnia and Herzegovina by signing the Marrakesh Agreement on Access to Printed Works for Persons with Visual Impairment, are being regulated. And finally, the right of broadcasting and rebroadcasting is regulated, the issues of royalties and records of income from the use of copyrighted works are adjusted, a new related right is introduced for informative publications, and a chapter on public communication of copyrighted works that are shared via the Internet is introduced.

What are the positive proposals in these drafts that will reflect on the right to protect the author’s work of journalists and media in Bosnia and Herzegovina?

Hasić: For the first time journalistic works are being listed among protected copyright works. Journalistic works, were, ofcourse, previously protected as copyright works alongside an opened and inclusive definition of copyright work, but the positive proposal is that the journalist works are specifically stated and defined in the draft law. This should provide more legal security, and clarity for the journalists during protection of their rights at the court. Therefore, the draft law introduces a new copyright on informative publications, which will bring direct benefits for journalists and media workers and their author’s texts. In this context, legal provisions authorize the publishers of publications to control the use of journalistic content and charge a fee for that use. It was suggested that the journalists – authors have the right to part of the compensation which publishers of the informative publications achieve, so that this right should result as an additional source of income for the journalists. It was also proposed to introduce rules which would give more control to journalists over searching and posting their work on internet, rewritten from the famous EU Directive on copyright rights on a unique market. In draft law which regulates collective exercise of copyright rights, also is predicting founding of a collective organization which will collectively exercise (protect) copyright and related rights of journalists.

Such a collective organization could better fight for the realization and protection of copyrights of journalists in Bosnia and Herzegovina and represent additional sources of income for journalists.

Not all the proposed provisions in the draft laws are binding or in accordance with European standards. What is essentially disputed, and what could have a negative impact on the protection of the copyright of journalists and the media?

Hasić: It is proposed to change the existing rules on copyright works created in the employment relationship. In the current law, copyright property rights over the work/media content created in the employment relationship are transferred to the employer for a period of five years, unless otherwise expressly stipulated in the author’s employment contract. After those five years, the rights are returned to the author, and the employer must pay for a new transfer of rights and to continue using the author’s work. The draft proposes to change this rule so that the rights are transferred to the employer permanently, if the author does not agree otherwise with the employer in the employment contract or other legal instrument. In this way, journalists lose part of the control over the fruits of their work, as well as an additional source of income, and the rights given to journalists and media workers in the existing legislation are taken away. When it comes to the use of generative artificial intelligence (AL), the draft proposes to allow free mining of text and data without the need to obtain permission from the author or pay fair compensation. The draft contains provisions according to which the author can explicitly prohibit text mining, but it is still not clear how he will be able to do this in practice. Such a provision, which may represent an error in the draft law, could be detrimental to journalists and media workers, but also potentially contrary to international agreements signed by Bosnia and Herzegovina in the field of intellectual property. Finally, even explicitly listing journalistic works as a type of protected author’s work is potentially problematic because it lists only three types of journalistic author’s works: articles, photographs, and audiovisual contributions. In their professional activity, journalists create a significantly wider circle of mental creations than these three, so this clause would have to be changed during public consultations.

PHOTO: Radio Brčko

TUMM: We oppose the suppression of free speech

0
Photo: PR Centar

PODGORICA, 28.03.2024. – The Trade Union Media of Montenegro (TUMM) strongly condemns the gross insulting of the Vice-President of the TUMM and the Vice-President of the Council of Radio and Television of Montenegro, Marijana Camovic-Velickovic, by the General Director of the Public Service, Boris Raonic.

It is unnecessary to elaborate on what kind of improper and uncivilized procedure it is. Still, on this occasion, we especially point out that it is an attempt by Raonic to put pressure on Camović-Velickovic and that only because she continuously repeats what few of the public officials in this country are allowed to do – that Raonic is the illegally elected general director of the RTCG. The highest judicial instance established this, the Basic and High Courts in Podgorica and the Supreme Court of Montenegro, and his reelection is also being investigated by the Special Prosecutor’s Office.

That is why we see this action of the illegally elected director of the Public Service as an intimidation of the legally elected vice-president and member of the RTCG Council, which in itself is a reason the reaction of the president of the Council Veselin Drljevic and the Council itself, as well as other institutions that deal with the media in Montenegro.  TUMM will also inform international organizations about this attempt to silence free speech in the body that controls the work of the general director of RTCG, by that same director.

TUMM provides full support to Marijana Camovic-Velickovic in her work in the RTCG Council, where she acts completely autonomously and strives to improve the work of the Public Service and make it more transparent, given that it is financed from the budget of all citizens of Montenegro. We are sure that insults, pressure, and intimidation will not prevent her from this fight.

The main board of TUMM

Letter to Serbian authorities: Urgent action needed to address imminent threats targeting journalists Ana Lalić Hegediš and Dinko Gruhonjić

0
photo: canva

In a letter to Serbian authorities, the International and European Federation of Journalists (IFJ-EFJ) joins partners of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) in urging them to address death threats faced by journalists Ana Lalić Hegediš and Dinko Gruhonjić, in Serbia. We are deeply concerned that no decisive action has been taken to conduct a thorough investigation, arrest the perpetrators and provide the journalists with adequate protection.

Source: EFJ

Reuters Institute: Research shows women only make 24% of news top editors

0
FOTO: Nezavisne novine

New research by the Reuters Institute analyses the gender representation of senior editors in major news outlets across five continents, recording that women fill only 24% of senior editorial roles in the markets surveyed. The findings highlight how gender inequalities can reinforce misperceptions, imbalances, and perceived differences both within journalism and as covered by journalists.

The research “Women and leadership in the news media 2024: Evidence from 12 markets” took examples from five continents, and analysed the gender breakdown of editorial leaders.  Two hundred and forty major online and offline news outlets provided data.

According to the factsheet, among the 33 news top editors appointed across brands covered this year and last, 24% are women. In some of these countries, however, women outnumber men among working journalists.

Reuters contrasts its new findings with data from the past five years. The proportion of women among the top editors has increased by only 2% since 2020, going from 23% to 25% in 2024. The Institute’s analysis anticipates that, at this pace, gender parity will be reached in such positions only by the year 2074.

Change is not consistent throughout countries, however. If the percentage has increased relative to 2020 in six countries (name them all), it has decreased in Germany by 2% and it has highly decreased in South Africa, from 47% to 29%.

Reuters Institute makes clear that “top editorial leadership matters both in terms of how journalism is practised and how it appears in society,” insisting on  how top editors represent the wider public “in all its difference and diversity.”

Cource: IFJ

PHOTO: Nezavisne novine

Mijatović: Media regulation should be adopted as soon as possible, RTCG to respect court decisions

0
Photo: https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/the-commissioner

PODGORICA, 22.03.2024. – Montenegro should use the opportunities offered by European integration to improve the legal framework that regulates human rights and ensure its full implementation, said Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights Dunja Mijatović after she visited Montenegro from March 18 to 21, 2024.

The statement of the Council of Europe states that during the visit, Mijatović received information about the worrying increase in hate speech, especially on the Internet, which exacerbates divisions on ethnic, religious and political grounds and has a particularly negative effect on certain social groups, especially Roma, LGBTI persons and women in public positions.

“Sexist and misogynist hate speech against female politicians, journalists, and human rights activists undermines gender equality. Accordingly, the authorities should show zero tolerance and take measures to prevent and combat this phenomenon,” said Mijatović. Emphasizing the important role of Montenegrin women in society, she called on the authorities to ensure greater political participation of women.

Mijatović specifically called for the rapid adoption of a set of media laws, the Law on Legal Gender Recognition based on Self-Determination… During the meetings with Montenegrin officials, Mijatović also warned about the long-term polarization in the media sector, the unregulated online media environment that enables the spread of disinformation, the lack of effective media self-regulation, insufficient media literacy…

“The non-implementation of the decisions of the domestic courts on the appointment of the director of the Radio Television of Montenegro (RTCG) raises questions regarding respect for the rule of law, which is an issue that also needs to be resolved urgently,” the announcement emphasizes.

When it comes to freedom of expression and the media, the commissioner assessed that it is encouraging that there has been a decrease in cases of physical violence against journalists recently. She, however, emphasized the importance of all cases of violence and intimidation of journalists, especially the murder of the editor-in-chief of “Dan” Duško Jovanović, to be effectively investigated and the perpetrators to be brought to justice.

“The Commissioner is concerned about the reported increasing use of strategic lawsuits against media and journalists (SLAPP). The authorities should take concrete measures to prevent unpleasant complaints against journalists, human rights defenders, writers and activists, relying on SE standards and other relevant standards, as they have a deeply chilling effect. I welcome the recent call by the Minister of Culture and Media to all Montenegrin officials to create an environment for the free and independent work of all media and journalists,” Mijatović said.

She emphasizes that she received information about the intimidation of academics, writers and activists, such as Boban Batrićević and Andrej Nikolaidis.

“I repeat that in a free and democratic society, it is imperative to fully respect the freedom of expression of all actors of civil society,” she stressed.

Mijatović called on the authorities to cooperate with civil sector organizations. During her visit to Montenegro, the Commissioner met with President Jakov Milatović, Prime Minister Milojko Spajić, Minister of Foreign Affairs Filip Ivanović, Minister of Justice Andrej Milović, Minister of Human and Minority Rights Fatmir Gjeka, Protector of Human Rights Siniša Bjeković and representatives of the non-governmental sector and the media.

MFRR Monitoring Report 2023 – 1,117 media freedom alerts in the past year

0
Credits: MFRR

The partners from the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR)  publish the latest edition of its Monitoring Report which documents press freedom violations from January to December 2023.

The latest Monitoring Report – produced by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF), the International Press Institute (IPI), and the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) as part of the MFRR – gathers and analyses all media freedom violations recorded on Mapping Media Freedom throughout the year 2023.

 

War in Ukraine

The 2023 report opens with a thematic chapter on the ongoing war in Ukraine and its repercussions for press freedom. The MFRR recorded a total of 149 alerts throughout 2023 affecting 220 different media entities.

 

DDoS Attacks

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks became prominent in Hungary and other countries in Europe. Unfortunately, the number of such cases doubled compared to the previous year, with 61 alerts targeting 112 persons or entities related to the media.

 

Incidents by public authorities/politicians

A third thematic chapter was dedicated to populist attacks on media freedom in Europe, ranging from verbal harassment and censorship, to legal attacks and ‘foreign agent’ laws.

 

Abusive lawsuits and SLAPPs

A final thematic chapter focuses on civil and criminal lawsuits against journalists and media outlets. In 2023, 20 legal cases containing hallmarks of SLAPPs were recorded by MFRR partners.

The report also includes country reports offering a summary of the most relevant threats in the following EU countries: France, the Netherlands, Italy, Hungary, Spain, Finland, and Slovakia; and in the following candidate countries: Serbia, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Turkey.

 

Key Figures

  • 1,117 media freedom violations were recorded in EU Member States and candidate countries, involving 1,620 individuals or media outlets.
  • 602 alerts were recorded in the EU, while 515 were registered in candidate countries.
  • In the EU, the main source of attacks remained private individuals (almost 33% of cases), worryingly followed by public officials (17.9%) and police and state security (12.6%).
  • 3 media workers were murdered – two in Ukraine and one in Albania.
  • 149 media freedom violations were recorded in Ukraine, a slight increase on last year’s 147 alerts. The MFRR started monitoring Ukraine immediately after the full-scale invasion in 2022.
  • 20.6% of all incidents in the EU involved some kind of physical attack. A considerable number of incidents included cases involving attacks to property (17.4%) and censorship (15.9%).
  • Within Member States of the EU, verbal attacks (35.9%) represented the largest amount of alerts, followed by legal incidents (24.9%) and physical attacks, accounting for 20.6% of the total incidents. In EU candidate countries, legal incidents were at the forefront of alerts (29.7%), followed by verbal attacks such as harassment second with 27.2%.

Source: EFJ

Webinar on the topic of the safety of journalists in Serbia

0
Photo: Pixabay.com

The first webinar on the fight against impunity for crimes against journalists in Serbia was held yesterday, organized by the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) and the Association of Journalists of Serbia (UNS). The webinar was attended by journalists from Serbia, as well as representatives of domestic and international journalistic associations.

At the beginning of the webinar, Ivana Stevanović, executive director of the “Slavko Ćuruvija Foundation”, spoke about the final verdict for the murder of journalist Slavko Ćuruvija.

Veran Matić introduced the representatives of international organizations with the work of the Permanent Working Group for the Safety of Journalists. He also spoke about the current situation when it comes to the safety of journalists in Serbia. He mentioned recent cases in which journalists Verica Marinčić, Ksenija Pavkov and Ana Lalić were attacked.

The webinar was also attended by Ana Lalić, against whom an orchestrated campaign has been conducted for the last ten days. She spoke about the threats and pressures she faces. She said she doesn’t feel safe and is considering moving to another state with her family.

The situation regarding the safety of journalists in Serbia has escalated so much that announcements and open letters to domestic and international institutions are not enough, concrete action is needed, the webinar participants concluded.

They agreed that it is necessary to exert concrete international pressure on the authorities and institutions in Serbia in order to ensure a safer environment for the work of journalists.

The President of the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), Maja Sever, participated and voiced her support for journalists in Serbia.