Home Blog Page 357

Appointment of the RTVFB&H management board – Legal or agreed solution?

0

SARAJEVO, 02.03.2018. -For four years, the RTVFB&H Management Board has no legal basis, since all mandates of all Board members have expired. The specificity of the election of the members of the RTVFB&H Management Board, or the legal solution in relation to this issue, is reflected in the fact that the Law on Public Service of RTVFB&H (adopted in July 2008) prescribes the composition of the Management Board of four members, namely three from the constituent peoples and one from the others, elected only for one term, without the possibility of renewal, with the length of the mandate being different, in order to elect one member each year, which aimed to prevent or minimize political influence on RTVFB&H through the Management Board. Namely, with this mechanism of election of members of the Board, all four members would not be elected in one electoral mandate, which would prevent political influence of one party (or coalition) on the Board because, according to the Article 25 of the Law on Public Service of the RTVFB&H members of the Board are appointed by the Parliament of the Federation of B&H. However, as already mentioned, the mandate of all members of the RTVFB&H Board expired more than four years ago (one in 2010, then in 2011, 2012 and last in 2013). Also, the director of RTVFB&H has been on this position since 2008, and his five-year term expired in 2013.

This precedent in the management practice of a part of the public broadcasting system shows how much political interests are reflected on public service, since RTVFB&H has been put in this position by political means (by blocking the appointment of members of the Board) and  since from September last year there have been debates and agreements on how to resolve the appointment issue between current coalition partners in the Federation of B&H. One of the proposed solutions was to announce vacancy for all four members of the Management Board at once. The Deputy Chairman of the House of Representatives of the Parliament of the FB&H and the president of the Working Group for the Selection and Appointment from both Houses, in December even told the media that he was in charge of the services to prepare the vacancy announcement. Reactions to this initiative came from the opposition, as well as representatives of civil society and international organizations, and mostly referred to the fact that it was a violation of the law in order to politically influence the public service.

It is beyond doubt that since 2014, when the current composition of the FBiH Parliament has been appointed, it was possible to resolve the issue of the RTVFB&H Management Board and to start gradually appointing its members if there was a for political will and agreement, but that did not happen. However, it happened that this issue was actualized precisely in the election year with an aim to make a quick solution, which opens a space for suspicion that this was an attempt to achieve direct political control over the RTVFB&H before the start of the election campaign. The Office of the High Representative in B&H says that it is necessary for Parliament to appoint members of the RTVFB&H Board in accordance with the legal principles of gradual appointment and political independence of the members of the Management Board.

This recent development related to the issue of the appointment of the RTVFB&H Management Board, besides the issue of political influence on public services in BiH, opens a number of other issues that only occasionally are subject of debate of expert and general public in Bosnia and Herzegovina, who do not find appropriate solutions. First of all, they relate to the fact that the implementation of laws (not only those related to media and/or public services) depends on the “political will”, that is, the lack or the existence of willingness of those who are in power at the moment to behave and decide in accordance to legal regulations. In 2014, there were all legal requirements for the gradual appointment of members of the RTVFB&H Management Board  which would then enable appointment of director and the legal functioning and management of the Public service of the Federation of B&H, but obviously there was no “political will”, so this question remained unresolved. Now, on the eve of the election, there is a “political will” to influence the RTVFB&H and its program policy by appointing members of the Management Board, and proposing solutions that are not prescribed by law. Moreover, some representatives of opposition parties even directly asked Parliament to come to a conclusion that they would respect the Law on Public Service of RTVFB&H, that is, appoint members of the Management Board in the manner prescribed by law. The fact that the law is respected by “political will,” that is, by the arbitrary will of the political elite, is unknown in democratic societies and systems. Furthermore, the decision-making by non-institutional means, that is, negotiations and agreements between the parties, has reached such a level that political representatives consider it quite legitimate to give statements to the media that the way in which the appointment of the Management Board (the non-legal mechanism – by simultaneously appointing all four members or changing of the law) will be decided by the out-of-parliamentary procedure, and then only formally confirmed through Parliament. This does not apply, of course, to a specific case of RTVFB&H, but this case has again directly demonstrated parallelism in political decision-making and the power of political representatives to agree on legal or non-legal methods of resolving a matter, depending on their own interests. Bosnia and Herzegovina is probably the only country in the world where laws and court judgments are “implemented”, and not necessarily respected.

An additional precedent is the functioning of the RTVFB&H Public Service without a Management Board and with the director in a technical mandate, which makes this media, in fact, a specific “hybrid” public service, which acts in certain segments as a private media (emitting so-called low-cost content, programs from neighboring countries, Turkish soap operas, domestic production re-runs that are on the screen for more than twenty years, etc., and based on the collection of funds from commercial advertising, to cover the costs of employees and the current production of the program), then as the system on its own, and not as part of the public broadcasting system in B&H (debt due to the provision of services to other parts of the system – BHRT), anad, as other parts of the system, when it comes to the information program, it “suffers” from political dependence and influence (in the research on media freedom from 2017, 47% of respondents recognized political influence on public services in B&H). It is clear that without the existence of the Management Board, Article 28 of the Law on Public Service of RTVFB&H (which implies that the property, budget, program contents and the legality and effectiveness of the RTVFB&H is controlled by a body that is above the management of RTVFB&H) can not be respected, which only shows that it is necessary to find solution for the RTVFB&H Management Board. Transparency in the work of RTVFB&H is somewhat achieved by publishing the RTVFB&H Report on the Work and Business Achievements on its official web site, but the last published report is for 2015, while the report for 2016 is not available on the website, nor is the Independent Auditor’s Report for 2016. Last published Program plan is for 2011, therefore, in the last seven years, there is no publicly available document defining program planning of RTVFB&H. All this shows that it is necessary to begin to seriously address the issue of the crisis of the Management Board of the Public System of RTVFB&H. However, the issue of RTVFB&H should be addressed systemically through the transformation of the public broadcasting system in B&H, and not only superficially and partially, which would cause the influence on this media in the election year. It is precisely in the election year  necessary to ensure that all parts of the public broadcasting system in B&H are in the service of citizens/public, that they have a public interest high on their list of priorities, and that they provide citizens with fair, objective, reliable, balanced and high quality information. In this regard, the independence of RTVFB&H must be guaranteed, among other things, in a way to prevent the influence of political parties that currently form a parliamentary majority through the appointment of the members of the Management Board. In this sense, no solutions proposed as a “quick fix”, as a result of political negotiations and agreements “behind the scenes” and in the package with some other solutions, which lead to the endangerment of independence and further destruction of the public broadcasting system in B&H, are not and should not be acceptable.

euThis article has been produced as a part of the project Western Balkan’s Regional Platform for advocating media freedom and journalists’ safety with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the BH Journalists Association and its authors, and can in no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.

The Steering Committee of BHJA condones the attack on the BHT1 team in Tuzla during protest of demobilized fighters

0

SARAJEVO, 02.03.2018. – The Steering Committee of BH Journalists Association expresses concern over the attacks and threats to the team of BHT1, that was attacked yesterday during the protest of the demobilized fighters in Tuzla and the traffic blockade on the Šićka loop at the exit of the city. Some of the demobilized fighters verbally insulted the reporter Marko Divkovic  and Enes Muratovic, cameraman of BHT 1, threatened to destroy their equipment and tried to prevent them recording. After this incident, one number of journalists left the place of protest, as a sign of solidarity for the BHT1 team, refusing to record persons who do not value elementary media freedoms, nor the right of journalists on safe and dignified work.

The Steering Committe of BHJA remindes that the protest of demobilized fighters, their efforts in seeking justice and regional life conditions, would not have reached the public and all citizens of BiH, if it wasn’t for journalists, recorders and photo-reporters, who yesterday and throughout the night devotedly worked and recorded the statements and requests of the warrior fighters organizations, followed what was happening at the protest  places and in the institutions responsible for solving the problems of the demobilized fighters. Therefor it is unacceptable, that in seeking their own rights, demobilized war-fighters themselves, are jeopardizing the rights of journalists teams and endager their safety and work – freedom.

In this context, The Steering Committee of BHJA condemns from the war – fighter organizations and the protest leaders in Tuzla to direct a public apologize to the team of BHT1 for violent behavior of one number of their colleagues, and asks for enabling regular work conditions for journalists and media teams in the Tuzla-area, but also on all other places throughout Federation of BiH where protests eventually will be organized.

The Steering Committee of BH Journalist Association 

Slovak police detain seven people over journalist’s murder

0

SKOPJE, 02.03.2018 – Slovakian police detained seven people in the investigation for the murder of investigative journalist Jan Kuciak, said the chief of the police Tibor Gaspar. There are no more details for now. Gaspar previously stated that the police searched most of the addresses in the east of Slovakia related to the people that the journalist was interested in.

The journalist and his fiancé last week were killed by firearms at their home. Gaspar did not publish the names of the detainees, but said the raids were linked to an Italian businessman who is allegedly associated with the Italian mafia, for which Kuciak wrote in his last posthumously published text.

Kuciak’s murder was the first of a journalist in Slovakia and the fifth such case concerning a reporter or reporters in the European Union in the past decade, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF).

Pressure on media is a sign of a society’s regression

0

PODGORICA, 01.03.2018 – Political pressures on journalists and media freedom are signs of regression and failure to understand the principles and values of a democratic society, said Mehmet Koksal, representative of the European Federation of Journalist (EFJ).

In an interview for RTCG Portal, Koksal said that public figures, such as politicians, should include journalists, as well as critical voices, in their strategies, in order to develop democratic values in the country.

Assessing the media environment in the region, and speaking about the best and the worst media conditions, Koksal said that according to the regional platform www.safejournalists.net, committed to advocating for media freedom and journalists safety 26 cases of violation of journalists’ rights have been reported in Montenegro.

The best situation is in Montenegro

This our country, according to Koksal, ranks as the best of all countries in the region.

“In Croatia, 41 cases of violations of the rights of journalists have been reported, 56 in Macedonia, and 102 in Bosnia and Herzegovina. There are also 136 reported cases of violations of the rights of journalists in Serbia. Based on these specific figures, Montenegro is ranked as the best the region.

His impression is that Macedonia is currently the country showing the strongest commitment to improve human rights indicators.

Answering the question whether journalists in Montenegro are protected enough Koksal said that journalists in our country, despite the fact that situation is not as grave as in other countries in the region, “continue to face numerous obstacles and rights’ violations”.

“The Mapping media freedom platform has reported 43 reports of Montenegrin journalists’ rights violations between 2010 and 2018. In October 2017 for instance, a police investigation concluded that the private vehicle of Montenegrin journalist Miroslav Drobnjak was intentionally set on fire. The EFJ issued a press release in September 2017 about Montenegrin journalist Vladimir Otašević receiving death threats from the Prime Minister’s brother Velizar Marković. Incidents like this show that journalists in Montenegro do not work in safe environments, despite the dedicated work of our Montenegrin affiliate SMCG”, said Koksal.

He valued the work of SMCG President, Marijana Camović, who points out, as he recalled, on numerous problems that Montenegrin journalists face.

“She criticises the closure of media outlets and withholding of journalists’ salary. As she correctly stated, there can be no media freedom if journalists are not free in Montenegro”, he said.

It’s difficult to compare Montenegro and Turkey

When it comes to media freedom Kokas said that it’s difficult to compare media freedom situation in Montenegro and Turkey given the big existing differences between two countries.

If we take into account average salary of journalists in Montenegro, Koksal said, that then it is not very difficult to be “better paid” in Turkey.

“I wouldn’t quote the Turkish average (500 to 600 EUR) as a good wage for a professional journalist. The classical approach compares the average salary of a journalist with the one of a teacher in public school or university professor in the country and nowhere in Western Balkans or Turkey, we have yet reached this lower limit for the media industry“.

Therefore, he said, we need a strong regional campaign to push media companies and authorities to show political will and concrete actions to support media workers.

“Journalists in Turkey face enormous and dramatic problems linked to various factors (media concentration, censorship and self-censoring, imprisonment, physical and verbal attacks, trolling and psychological harassment, property seizures). The EFJ and its affiliates are working in various way to support colleagues in Turkey and to show solidarity in these difficult times”, said Koksal.

Provide decent conditions for journalists

He considers that we cannot expect journalists to become super press freedom heroes if we don’t offer them proper decent working conditions like any other public servants.

Speaking about expressed interest in some specific cases in Montenegro through the Council of Europe’s Platform for the Protection of Journalism and Safety of Journalists, Koksal said that EFJ issued an alert in October 2015, about an incident where Montenegrin police used teargas against a group of about 30 journalists reporting at a protest.

“The EFJ posted another alert on the CoE platform in December 2015 about Gojko Raičević, editor-in-chief of the news portal www.in4s.net, being regularly physically targeted by authorities in Montenegro, which prompted a reply by the Montenegrin authorities in March 2016”, said Koksal.

During his recent visit to Montenegro, Koksal supported the amendments to media laws of the Trade Union of Media of Montenegro. He believes that these steps are crucial for improving the situation of many colleagues working in difficult conditions in Montenegro.

“Without good working conditions it’s not possible to have press freedom and independent journalism which are key elements of our democratic societies”, believes Koksal.

 

 

 

AJM presented the winners of the annual journalistic awards

0

SKOPJE, 01.03.2018 – Yesterday, AJM celebrated the 72nd anniversary. On this occasion, three journalists received award for their merit. Recipients of the Investigative journalist award were Menche Atanasova Tochi and Snezhana Lupevska Sozen, while the journalist Ljubomir Gajdov won the lifetime achievement award.

The president of AJM Naser Selmani, congratulated the winners and noted that they are an example of how a journalist in a free and democratic country should look like.

Selmani said that journalists in Macedonia are still facing serious problems, since impunity of violence against journalists persists and the media legislation needs changing.

“Despite the declarative commitment of the new government to fight against the practice of impunity for violence against journalists, none of the attackers has been brought to justice,” Selmani said.

He noted that in addition to the impunity problem and media legislation, journalists face new forms of pressures, such as the attempt to tie the hands of journalists by offering them security certificates and the practice of large companies to use advertising as a tool for putting pressure on the media.

According to him, the fight of journalists for freedom of speech will continue, because life without freedom is slavery. “United we are stronger and more resilient until the day freedom of speech in Macedonia will not be just words on paper, instead it will be part of our life,” said the president of AJM.

The award winners thanked the AJM for the honor, and said that they hope to be succeeded next year by young fellow journalists.

Case of attack on Mladen Stojović: Commission found irregularities in the investigation, police without reaction

0

PODGORICA, 01.03.2018 –Due to police failures, there is no trace that could be used for resolving the attack on journalist Mladen Stojović, who was brutally beaten in his apartment in Bar, in August 2008. The report of the Commission for Monitoring Actions of Competent Authorities in the Investigation of Cases of Threats and Violence against Journalists, Assassinations of Journalists and Attacks on Media Property shows the existence of two substantially different official notes which raises doubt that police officers maybe wanted to conceal that the injured expressed suspicion that an attack on him could have been organized by Branislav Brano Mićunović and Radojica Božović. In the longer version of the official note, this part of its shorter version was omitted. From Mićunović and Božović, the police never requested any information regarding the attack on Stojović.

In January, the Government Commission published performance report for the period September 23, 2017 to January 23, 2018, in which, among others, case of Stojović was elaborated.

One of the key problems in the work of the Commission, besides lack of actions upon its recommendations, was lack of information provided to public about the Commission’s work since its reports were never published.

“Report on investigation of the case of attack of Mladen Stojović” was compiled by the Commission’s rapporteur for the case, Dragoljub Duško Vuković.

“Journalist Mladen Stojović was injured on May 23, 2008, in the evening (between 22.00 and 23.00 hours) in the apartment of his parents in Bar. At the time of the injuries, Stojović worked as a journalist in “Wireless Media doo Podgorica”. Previously he worked as a sports journalist in several media outlets in Serbia and Montenegro. Among other things, he talked about his findings of the so-called football mafia for the “Insider” of Belgrade-based B92 television”, states the report.

The conclusions of the Commission’s Report state that two police officers, who were on the site on May 23, 2008, i.e. in the apartment of the injured Mladen Stojović, according to the official note, did not try to take fingerprints or discover something that could be used as a trail for finding the attacker. There is no information that the police subsequently came to Stojović’s apartment in an attempt to discover any possible traces that could lead to the attacker.

Failures during the search of Stojović’s apartment, were also identified by Dragana Čukić, a forensic expert who in supplementary conclusions noted that the police did not search for blood traces professionally. She concluded that in the apartment “there must have been blood traces in both situations – if the injuries were inflicted in the apartment, as well as if they were inflicted outside it. On the basis of all the data, I conclude that blood traces have not been found because they have not been sought in an expert manner”.

The police files submitted to the Commission have no note on whether the police, after controversial statements by several citizens regarding information about young men who were allegedly interested in Stojović, tried to collect additional information and discover the truth.

Extremely confusing are information about the different dates on the formation of the case against an unknown perpetrator in the Basic State Prosecutor’s Office of Bar on the basis of a criminal complaint filed by the police on June 11, 2008.

“The police files provided to the Commission have no information whether it was checked if Stojović’s passport, which he could not find after the attack, was used for entering or leaving Montenegro or entering/leaving a European state”, state the conclusions of the Commission’s Report.

Istraga o snimanju urednika “Južnih vesti” i dalje „tapka u mestu“

0

NIŠ, 28.02.2018. – Skoro godinu dana je prošlo otkako je glavni urednik Južnih vesti Predrag Blagojević prijavio da ga je nepoznati muškarac ispred Suda, u centru Niša, snimao kamerom iz automobila, ali kako kažu u Osnovnom javnom tužilaštvu, istraga nije makla dalje od početka.

Još je, kažu u Tužilaštvu, nepoznat identitet vlasnik automobila „golf 5“, registracija NI 094 ŽČ iz kojeg je Blagojević sniman, niti je poznat identitet osobe koja je bila za kamerom.

Pored toga, kažu, Osnovnom javnom tužilaštvu iz niške policije mesecima ne stižu izveštaji u vezi sa ovim slučajem.

Poslednji izveštaj Policijske uprave u Nišu, po zahtevu Osnovnog javnog tužilaštva u Nišu dostavljen je 17. jula 2017. godine, a u navedenom izveštaju se ne ukazuje na identitet lica koje je snimalo Predraga Blagojevića dana 21. marta 2017. godine – kažu u Osnovnom javnom tužilaštvu.

Dodaju i da je “postupanje policije po zahtevu Tužilaštva i dalje u toku”.

Podsetimo, Policijska uprava u Nišu i MUP već mesecima odbijaju da odgovore na pitanja novinara o tome šta su tačno preduzeli kako bi otkrili ko je vlasnik automobila i ko je te večeri njime upravljao, ali i da prokomentarišu tvrdnje Osnovnog tužilaštva da su mesecima odbijali da odgovaraju i na njihove „urgencije“.

Attacks against journalists flare up in Serbia

0

BELGRADE, 28.02.2018. – The International Press Institute (IPI) today welcomed a decision by Serbia’s interior ministry granting Belgian reporter Philippe Bertinchamps a residence permit after previously denying Bertinchamps’s application on spurious “public order” grounds.

According to reports, Bertinchamps, who has lived and reported from Belgrade as a correspondent for French-speaking media for many years, was threatened with expulsion from Serbia after the Interior Ministry (MUP) twice denied him a temporary residence permit in 2017 on the basis of his allegedly posing an “obstacle to public order and national security”. Officials had provided no evidence to support its claims, even though a Serbian administrative court in November 2017 ruled that the MUP must provide sufficient grounds for the rejection.

Bertinchamps, who had not previously had difficulty receiving the permit, said in interviews with Serbian media that he believed the rejection was in retaliation for his critical coverage of the Serbian authorities.

The Bertinchamps affair, however, is only one of a series of incidents, including threats and harassment, targeting journalists that have taken place in recent weeks following a joint press freedom mission to Serbia by IPI, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) and South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO).

Those incidents stand in contrast to comments Serbian authorities made during the mission. Government representatives, including President Aleksandar Vučić, strongly insisted that press freedom is protected in Serbia and that journalists are able to work without harassment or threats. Notably, several of the reported incidents appear to have come from government supporters or pro-government media and have mimicked anti-media rhetoric employed by government officials.

Online harassment and verbal attacks on the street

The recent incidents have included:

• Following the assassination of Kosovo Serb politician Oliver Ivanović in January, Dragan Janjić, the vice president of the Independent Journalist Association of Serbia (NUNS) and editor-in-chief of the independent news agency Beta, received numerous insults and threats on social media after suggesting that Ivanović’s murder was politically motivated. The threats included suggestions to shoot or hang him, according to the Western Balkans Regional Platform for Advocating Media Freedom and Journalists’ Safety.

The president of NUNS, Slavisa Lekić, said in a press release that by directly naming Janjić in a press conference in Kosovo, President Vučić had indirectly encouraged a smear campaign against him.

“Janjić, one of the most respected journalists in Serbia, received direct threats of beating, even murder, due to an opinion expressed on Twitter that ‘the liquidation of political opponents has begun’”, Lekić said in the press release. “His address was offered publicly. I expect the prosecutor’s office to react immediately and prevent further threats to Janjić’s safety.”

• Kosovo-based journalist Una Hajdari was also attacked after she posted a humorous picture on Twitter of President Vučić on his January 20 visit to Kosovo. The picture depicted Vučić with rabbit ears and nose. Supporters of the president insulted her, accusing her of “hating Serbia, the Serbs and Vučić”.

Nikola Radisić, who works for the broadcaster N1, was threatened on the street by two men who called him “an American spy and traitor” and told him to never step on that street again. Serbian government officials have repeatedly referred to N1, a CNN affiliate, derogatively as an “American” broadcaster. Notably, President Vučić told the international mission in January that he would stop referring to N1 in such a manner if the broadcaster asked him to.

• A journalist for the daily Kurir, Boban Karović, was intimidated by Liberal Democratic politician Cedomir Jovanović in January after the journalist refused to give him exclusive information on an interview. Jovanović asked for Karović’s address so that he could come or “send someone” there. After Karović refused, Jovanović said they would “sort this thing out tonight”.

• Additionally, NUNS was targeted in an incident in which unknown persons plastered insulting stickers claiming that NUNS is an “enemy of Serbia” and promotes “fake news” across the glass façade of the association’s Belgrade headquarters . NUNS described the incident as a “professionally organized campaign”, noting the perpetrators had apparently gone to great lengths to redesign the association’s logo and print it in colour on quality paper.

All of these incidents were reported to the authorities.

The state secretary of the Ministry of Culture and Information, Aleksandar Gajović, claimed in an interview with Radio Free Europe that he is in no position to condemn attacks or threats against journalists, although he said at the same time that state authorities “should react to every display of force, to any denial of any freedoms”.

The state secretary also hinted that one journalist, Nedim Sejdinović, who had received death threats on social media might have fabricated the threats, “in order to present himself as a victim”. The interview led the main Serbian journalists’ organizations to request the dismissal of Gajović as state secretary.

According to NUNS, Prime Minister Ana Brnabić has reacted to most of the recent cases, saying that attacks on journalists were “unacceptable and inappropriate”.

“It is equally terrible if somebody attacks journalists on TV Pink or verbally attack journalist of N1”, she said.

IPI Deputy Director Scott Griffen said IPI welcomed the prime minister’s specific comment that attacks on journalists are unacceptable but was nevertheless troubled by the series of incidents following the international mission’s recent visit.

“As we noted during our mission, it is essential that Serbian officials at all levels send a clear message that any type of harassment against journalists is wrong and that statements condemning such harassment should be issued without conditions or qualifications”, he said. “Political party leaders have a particular responsibility to intervene when attacks against journalists are carried out by those claiming to be their supporters. Similarly, we urgently call on officials to dispense with anti-media rhetoric and verbal harassment of journalists, which last month’s international mission found had contributed to a chilled atmosphere for media freedom in Serbia and which has the potential to fuel physical attacks.”

He added: “Police and judicial authorities must take steps to ensure that all reported incidents of threats made against journalists are investigated and, where appropriate, prosecuted.”

Smear campaign against journalist, NGO member

Separately, Serbian journalist groups have noted with concern what they have termed a campaign carried out by the commercial broadcaster TV Pink, widely seen as supportive of Serbia’s current government, against the NGO Centre for Research, Transparency and Accountability (CRTA) as an apparent response to a CRTA report detailing what it called TV Pink’s biased political coverage.

The campaign specifically targeted one CRTA member, Tamara Skrozza, who is also a journalist for the weekly Vreme and a member of Serbia’s Press Complaints Commission. While much of TV Pink’s coverage has focused on Skrozza’s activities at CRTA, the arguments against CRTA’s objectivity and credibility were based on Skrozza’s work with Vreme. According to Serbian journalist groups, the station showed videos of Skrozza that were put together from different clips taken out of context in order to portray her as an “enemy of the state” and as an opponent of Vučić.

CRTA and NUNS encouraged viewers to complain about the coverage to Serbia’s Regulatory Authority for Electronic Media (REM) in a campaign called Wake Up REM. The body received around 300 complaints in just a few days, but REM later issued an opinion stating that Pink TV had not violated any rules and therefore did not take any measures against it.

In a press release, TV Pink responded to the Wake Up REM campaign by insisting that Skrozza’s “propaganda activity” was not the subject of “anyone’s attention”. The statement said that “someone with such a strong political orientation and open hatred” such as Skrozza could not be an objective observer with an NGO such as CRTA and called for Skrozza to step back to “continue her political work” with Vreme.

The issue of Serbia media engaging in “smear campaigns” against journalists, especially those working for smaller, independent media, was raised repeatedly during the January 2018 mission. As it did during the mission, IPI urges Serbian media to refrain from participating in attacks against fellow journalists and to stop portraying journalists as political actors, which IPI believes strengthens official efforts to undermine the credibility and therefore effectiveness of journalist’s watchdog role.

Local media financing in Republic of Srpska

0

 SARAJEVO, 27.02.2018.-The answer to this question seems rather simple since it contains 64 sub-contracts, which is exactly the number of municipalities and towns in the Republic of Srpska. There is no law, at the level of Republic of Srpska, which precisely defines how local media financing should be tailored; instead, financing of media houses is the responsibility of local communities because they are entitled to handle this issue on their own. Additionally, local media houses, (mainly local radio stations) are financed directly from municipal and city/town budgets or they (local radio stations) are simply granted with certain financial means from same budgets.

Local Communities Conveyance

The Law on determining and transferring of property rights to the capital of Republic of Srpska (in local radio and television stations) to local self – governments, passed in 2010 and amended in 2012 (Official Gazette No. 73, published on 30 July 2010. 70/12), defines that the capital of all local radio stations shall be transferred to founders of these media houses and, in most cases, the establishers/founders include municipal or city/town assemblies, said the officials from the Ministry of Traffic and Communications of Republic of Srpska. Pursuant to this, this legal regulation is transferred to local self – governing levels. Local radio stations submit their reports on work and operations conducted and financial reports to city/town and municipal assemblies for passing. Ministry of Traffic and Communications of Republic of Srpska officials say that labor/work permits and frequency licenses are legally issued by the Communication Regulatory Agency (RAK) which, at the same time, controls the process of requested work requirements that must be met in order to obtain work license and permit. There are 5 locally – orientated television stations in the Republic of Srpska and around 40 radio stations. Local communities issue over 50 printed weekly, monthly and annual reports and there are over hundred local websites.

Public Local Media

Public local media include radio, TV and online or printed issues established by city/town or municipal authorities. In most cases, these are radio stations and this is why the existence and work operations, including the financing, mainly vary from municipality to municipality. In Gacko municipality (Herzegovina region), radio Gacko operates as a public local radio station as part of the local Information and Cultural Centre Public Establishment. This radio station has 8 employees working on a full time basis. Gacko Radio station disposes of BAM 183.480.00 on an annual level. Still, due to reducing the process of public incomes and very difficult situation for all local communities in the Republic of Srpska, it has been noted that decreasing and insufficient amounts of money were planned and dispersed to local media houses.

Gacko Municipality is no exception here. Financial means from the municipal budget sources that Gacko radio station received this year were reduced by 12% in comparison with the amount they had received last year from the same financing source. Bosiljka Glusac, Gacko radio general manager, confirmed that as far as the total income this radio station has at the disposal, 80% of the money comes from the municipal budget sources, while Gacko radio receives 20% from their own commercial marketing and advertising sources. Mrs. Glusac, however, warned that the decline of marketing money had been noted for the period of last ten years because local legal entities/companies have been their main advertising and marketing clients on local Gacko radio station. She outlined that most of them have been facing very difficult financial situations, while many of them went bankrupt or very simply forced to close down their business. “Program scheme of Gacko radio includes the municipal affairs, events, covering the situation in the fields of economy, agriculture, politics, sport, culture, and education. Radio has been particularly focused on the work and affairs at Gacko Thermal Power Plant, which is considered as an economic giant in this municipality because the majority of local people are employed and work there”, said the manager of this radio station.

Radio Gradiska operates in Gradiska municipality and its sole founder was Gradiska Municipality. Some BAM 200.000,00 is the amount allocated on an annual basis from the local municipal budget source and this amount is according to legal proceedings, deposited to the account of Public Establishment Radio Gradiska. Last year, the Municipality of Gradiska funded Gradiska radio with BAM 206.400, 00, said the officials from the Gradiska Municipality Financial Department. Just as radio Gacko (and many other radio stations in BiH), this radio station’s news and information program also mostly covers the information about local affairs from the fields of politics, economy, sport, and culture. Gradiska radio station issues Gradiska news bulletin (magazine) twice a year and the printing costs for this newspaper is also covered by the municipal budget money source with some BAM 6.500,00.

The municipality of Sokolac Assembly founded Sokolac Public Enterprise named “Info Centre” including the Sokolac Info Radio, which is a constituent part of this Info Centre and also the only public electronic media house in this particular municipality in the Republic of Srpska. The radio has been broadcasting its radio program (on daily basis) from 9 a.m. until 3 p.m. It does not operate on its own frequency; instead, it uses waves which are the property of Radio and Television of the Republic of Srpska. Sokolac Info Radio, in its news and information program, follows all current affairs in Sokolac and the City of Istocno Sarajevo, especially in the following programs: “Novosti”, “Sokolacka hronika”, “Hronika grada Istocno Sarajevo” etc. Sokolac municipality officials outlined that Info Radio has been broadcasting economy based programs, including educational, cultural, sport, entertaining, youth, children and religious programs as well. Sokolac newspapers are printed and issued monthly in Sokolac municipality. This printed edition mostly covers local affairs including the following: political affairs in Sokolac municipality, the general situation in the Republic of Srpska Forestry, because this particular company makes a significant financial contribution, as far as the budget income is concerned, because they pay a significant amount of tax money. Sokolac monthly newspaper also covers the subjects of education and culture. Sokolac Info Centre Public Enterprise has 13 employees working on a full time basis. Apart from the above-mentioned papers, these employees also edit and administrate the official website of Sokolac municipality, namely www.opstinasokolac.net. Sokolac Municipality funds Info center with some BAM 150.000,00 from local municipal budget money.

From RTV center to municipality without public media house

Development and scope of local media in the Republic of Srpska mostly depend on finances deriving from municipal budget sources. According to this, we have the illustrated case in the city of Prijedor, where on one hand; Prijedor radio station; Prijedor Television and Kozarski vijesnik (weekly printed magazine) operate as part of Public Establishment Kozarski vijesnik. On the other hand, smaller and poorer municipality find very difficult to finance and fund local media houses. For instance, there is not a single electronic media house in the municipality of Ljubinje in Herzegovina region. Ljubinje Glasnik, as the only printed magazine in this municipality, is issued once a year and local municipality funds this project with some BAM 2.000,00 to BAM 3.000,00. There are however more developed communities that have been functioning, operating and working for years without local public electronic media houses. Derventa is one of those places where the local Derventa based Association of Journalists and Reporters have been appealing for years and demanding from local governing official authorities to re-establish their local radio station which ceased working many years ago.

Local media houses, CRA (RAK) and sanctions

Local media houses are obliged to submit their work reports to local assemblies, since local assemblies are, in most cases, their founders. Still, electronic local media houses are directly responsible to Communication Regulatory Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CRA) as far as their work is concerned, because of the fact that it is the CRA that issues permits for program broadcasting, licenses for the use of frequency required etc. CRA is, on the other hand, entitled to impose sanctions and fines in case of violations of provisions deriving from the legal Code, including the rules of applicable broadcasting. What represents a clear problem here is the number of prescribed fines and sanctions and the maladjustment of rules imposed against small local media houses. A number of managers and directors of many local radio and TV stations that we spoke with, warned that certain rules, imposed by the CRA BiH, are almost impossible to follow and implement, because these are indeed too strict to follow, as far as small media houses are concerned. It was also pointed out and indicated, that the amount of imposed fines for certain rules violations are incredibly high since many local media houses find these fines unbearably inconvenient.

Local governing authorities and their impact on program editing policies

Financing the work of local media houses form city/towns and municipal budget funds may have negative and undesired consequences as well: local governing official authorities often misuse the fact that local media houses are directly financed from the budget funds and this does make an impact on program editing policies. Employees/staff are in broadcasted programs, often forced to promote the work of local official authorities, while on the other hand, media staff is banned from making reports based on critics addressed to local administration institutions. Milkica Milojevic, a female journalists with years of experience and also members of the Steering Committee of BHJA, warned that it was the financing of local public media directly from city, town or municipal budget funds that created the situation where media freedoms and liberties, at local levels, were in very difficult situation and are accordingly jeopardized, comparing to the situation in the Entity and state public media services (houses), where the situation is quite different, in regard with this particular issue. “The situation is even worse at local levels. The question is whether we can even talk about media in its origin and genuine meaning of the word. They (local media houses) are either on the edge of their persistence and survival, or they have to conduct the politics – based program influenced by certain governing political parties at local levels”, claimed Mrs. Milojevic.

How much freedom and liberty do journalists working for local media houses have?

As part of this story framework, many journalists working for local media houses have been contacted. They were expected to talk and express their opinions about work conditions they experience and eventual pressures they have been imposed with. Most of them refused to talk about this issue publically. A female journalist, working for local radio station in the southern part of Republic of Srpska, justified her refusal to publically speak about the situation in this particular media house, by stating that she was afraid that she may get sacked and lose her job, as this whole matter is tied and linked with local political affairs in this specific local community. “Last year, the new political party won the elections in our town. Consequently, new governing official authorities dismissed many former public company managers and appointed new managers closed to them instead. All journalists that had already been working in this media house were ever since looked at in a different way. I somehow have a feeling that we can no longer be trusted by our new management”, claimed this lady. “We had been put under a lot of pressure, mostly by the local governing officials, even before the political party took over, however during the most recent period, the situation went from bad to worse and I assume that the reason for this is the fact that the budget money planned for financing local community media house was rapidly reduced and this decrease in financing continued year by year”, she concluded.

Local communities and private media

Marketing represents the main source of income for private local media houses. Still, financial ties and connections between local communities and private media houses often occur through this kind of marketing. The city of Banjaluka officials had, for instance, in 2014 and 2015 dispersed over BAM 100.000.00 and this amount had been distributed to both public and private media houses for announcing public invitations to bids (tenders), including commercial advertisements, news, information etc. The city if Bijeljina also financed public and private media houses for information and advertising services with BAM 230.000, 00 in 2014 and BAM 338.000,00 in 2015. Interestingly enough, but also expected by many, during the distribution of these amounts, most of the allocated money went into the accounts of media houses whose program editing policies were closest to local governing political parties and accordingly biased.

The future of local media houses in RS

It is the inevitable fact that local communities in the Republic of Srpska tend to reduce the money distribution planned and scheduled for local media houses and their work, which consequently caused the cessation of work and closing down of tens of local media houses since the end of the war in BiH until present. Private local media houses are also experiencing difficult period because the incomes they acquire and earn from commercial marketing advertising is also reduced and decreasing, which again comes as a result of the economic decline at local levels. Common sense question accordingly follows: Will local media houses be able to sustain? One of their surviving opportunities may be seen in using new technologies that enable more affordable program production and broadcasting, but on the other hand, they should try to adapt to new formats required by their recipients. Nevertheless, the adoption process of local media houses, in order to fulfill the requirements of their viewers and listeners, should not be limitless to that extent, because the entertaining program scheme should as a result, not jeopardize their informative and educational primary functions. Therefore, local media houses, in order to sustain and survive, do require further support by municipalities and cities / towns in their communities, because regional or republic orientated media house shall never be able to approach and analyse the problem in some local community, as opposed to local media house, able to do this.

This text is a part of E-Bulletin– fourth edition of special serial of BHN online bulletin implemented through the “Media and Public Reputation” (origin. “Mediji i javni ugled”) project, also representing a contribution to public debate regarding the transparency of media ownership and upholding and encouraging the passing of set of laws aimed to advance media field and information market in BiH.