{"id":117024,"date":"2026-04-09T13:07:12","date_gmt":"2026-04-09T11:07:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/?p=117024"},"modified":"2026-05-20T13:08:58","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T11:08:58","slug":"sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija"},"content":{"rendered":"

Cenzolovka detaljno analizira presudu Vrhovnog suda koja pokazuje kako je Apelacioni sud, prema oceni Vrhovnog, osporavao klju\u010dne izjave i dokaze neta\u010dnim citiranjem svedoka i protivre\u010dnim argumentima. Time je napravljen teren za dono\u0161enje osloba\u0111aju\u0107e presude za ubistvo Slavka \u0106uruvije, koje se dogodilo na Uskrs 11. aprila 1999. godine, nakon \u0161to je ovog novinara danima pratilo 27 agenata Dr\u017eavne bezbednosti.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nakon osam godina su\u0111enja, sudije Apelacionog suda su 19. aprila 2023. godine pravosna\u017eno oslobodile \u010detvoricu biv\u0161ih funkcionera i pripadnika Resora dr\u017eavne bezbednosti (RDB) \u2013 \u00a0Radomira Markovi\u0107a,\u00a0Milana Radonji\u0107a, Ratka Romi\u0107a i Miroslava Kuraka\u00a0\u2013 koji su bili optu\u017eeni da su organizovali i izveli ovu likvidaciju.<\/p>\n

U me\u0111uvremenu se ispostavilo da je osloba\u0111aju\u0107a presuda, objavljena tek 10 meseci kasnije, 2. februara 2024, doneta uz povrede Zakona o krivi\u010dnom postupku:\u00a0Vrhovni sud je u oktobru pro\u0161le godine doneo presudu<\/a>\u00a0u kojoj je naveo na koje je sve na\u010dine peto\u010dlano apelaciono ve\u0107e prekr\u0161ilo zakon.<\/p>\n

Apelaciono ve\u0107e \u010dinile su sudije\u00a0Nada Had\u017ei Peri\u0107, Vesna Petrovi\u0107, Dragan \u0106esarovi\u0107, Marko Joci\u0107 i Du\u0161anka \u0110or\u0111evi\u0107.<\/p>\n

Neta\u010dno navo\u0111enje svedo\u010denja<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Slu\u010daj Milorada Ulemeka Legije<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Najbitnijim svedokom u ovom postupku smatra se\u00a0Milorad Ulemek Legija, \u010diji je iskaz u Tu\u017eila\u0161tvu za organizovani kriminal 2014. godine bio jedan od klju\u010dnih za podizanje optu\u017enice.<\/p>\n

    On je tada rekao da je Radomir Markovi\u0107 od njega u martu 1999. tra\u017eio da Jedinica za specijalne operacije likvidira jedno lice, ne preciziraju\u0107i koje, a Ulemek je to, prema sopstvenim re\u010dima, odbio. U me\u0111uvremenu je \u0106uruvija ubijen, a Markovi\u0107 je Ulemeku na slede\u0107em sastanku rekao \u201eoni Radonjini \u0161to su ubili \u0106uruviju\u201c, aludiraju\u0107i na Romi\u0107a i Kuraka.<\/p>\n

    Naredni put se Ulemek pojavio pred Vi\u0161im sudom 2016. godine. Upitan da se izjasni da li ostaje pri izjavi TOK-u, inkrimini\u0161u\u0107oj za optu\u017eene, Ulemek je eksplicitno rekao da ostaje. To je konstatovano i u presudi koju je Vi\u0161i sud doneo 2019, a citirali su ga i mediji koji su pratili su\u0111enje.<\/p>\n

    Tekst Slavko \u0106uruvija fondacije<\/a>\u00a0od 27.09.2016. nakon saslu\u0161anja Ulemeka pred Vi\u0161im sudom:<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    Prva presuda Vi\u0161eg suda (2019), str. 85:<\/b><\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    Ulemek je ostao pri ranijem iskazu i kada je doveden na saslu\u0161anje pred Apelacioni sud 2023, \u0161to su tako\u0111e\u00a0u tekstu sa su\u0111enja zabele\u017eili novinari Slavko \u0106uruvija fondacije<\/a>:<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    Uprkos svim ovim izjavama, Apelacioni sud je prakti\u010dno oborio njegovo svedo\u010denje neta\u010dnim navo\u0111enjem zapisnika, i u spornoj osloba\u0111aju\u0107oj presudi naveo da Legija nije ostao pri svojim ranijim iskazima:<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    Na ovaj na\u010din je Apelacioni sud, prema stavu Vrhovnog, povredio zakon.<\/p>\n

    \u201e(To \u0161to stoji) u obrazlo\u017eenju drugostepene presude (da svedok (\u2026) nije ostao pri iskazu) \u010dini znatno protivre\u010dnim sadr\u017eini zapisnika o ispitivanju svedoka Milorada Ulemeka pred TOK-om, prvostepenim i drugostepenim sudom. Shodno iznetom, u\u010dinjena je bitna povreda odredaba krivi\u010dnog postupka\u201c, presudio je Vrhovni sud.<\/p>\n

    Ipak, ovakvo iskrivljeno i neta\u010dno citiranje Legije omogu\u0107ilo je Apelacionom sudu da ospori njegove re\u010di kao klju\u010dnog svedoka i time njegovo svedo\u010denje prakti\u010dno u\u010dini irelevantnim.<\/p>\n

    Sli\u010dno preina\u010davanje se dogodilo i u slu\u010daju drugih svedoka iz nekada\u0161njeg zemunskog klana: bra\u0107e\u00a0Milo\u0161a\u00a0i\u00a0Aleksandra Simovi\u0107a, kao i\u00a0Dejana Milenkovi\u0107a Bagzija\u00a0i\u00a0Miladina Suvajd\u017ei\u0107a.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Milo\u0161 i Aleksandar Simovi\u0107<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Za razliku od Legije koji je u svim instancama svog svedo\u010denja o slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija ostao pri onome \u0161to je ranije rekao, slu\u010daj bra\u0107e Simovi\u0107 je ne\u0161to zamr\u0161eniji.<\/p>\n

      Najpre, obojica su u svom iskazu TOK-u u januaru 2014. rekli da ih je Legija obavestio da \u0107e morati da likvidiraju Kuraka, jer \u201eoni \u0161to su radili \u0106urku treba da se o\u010diste\u201c, ali se kasnije od toga navodno odustalo. I ovo svedo\u010denje je bilo inkrimini\u0161u\u0107e za optu\u017eene.<\/p>\n

      Pred Vi\u0161im sudom su se pojavili 28. septembra 2016. i tada je Milo\u0161 ostao pri svom iskazu, ali je Aleksandar odbio da se izja\u0161njava zbog navodnih pretnji njegovoj porodici. Ovo su, prema zapisima novinara Slavko \u0106uruvija fondacije, tom prilikom rekli u Vi\u0161em sudu:<\/p>\n

      \"\"<\/p>\n

      Drugi put su se pojavili pred Apelacionim sudom 8. marta 2023, ali su odbili da svedo\u010de. Milo\u0161 Simovi\u0107 je rekao da ne ostaje pri onome \u0161to je dosad govorio jer se navodno ni\u010dega ne se\u0107a, dok je Aleksandar rekao da ostaje pri svemu \u0161to je dosad svedo\u010dio, ali da sada \u201ene \u017eeli da u\u010destvuje\u201c.<\/p>\n

      Apelacioni sud je o ovome napisao:<\/p>\n

      \"\"<\/p>\n

      Vrhovni sud ovo smatra protivre\u010dnim zaklju\u010dkom, jer je Milo\u0161 Simovi\u0107 pred Vi\u0161im sudom ostao pri izjavi TOK-u, a Aleksandar je tada rekao da ne mo\u017ee da se izjasni.<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Dejan Milenkovi\u0107 i Miladin Suvajd\u017ei\u0107<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Ova dva svedoka su u iskazu TOK-u 2014. rekli da su od\u00a0Du\u0161ana Spasojevi\u0107a\u00a0(tada\u0161njeg \u0161efa zemunskog klana) saznali da im je Legija naredio da likvidiraju Kuraka i Romi\u0107a, \u201ejer su oni ubili \u0106uruviju\u201c, od \u010dega se kasnije, i prema njihovim re\u010dima, odustalo.<\/p>\n

        Obojica su na saslu\u0161anju pred Vi\u0161im sudom u decembru 2016. i januaru 2017. ostala pri ovim iskazima. Apelacioni sud je, me\u0111utim, oborio njihova svedo\u010denja navode\u0107i ne samo da su u pitanju posredna saznanja, odnosno informacije koje su od nekog \u010duli, nego i da su u pitanju \u201epotpuno razli\u010dite informacije\u201c.<\/p>\n

        \"\"<\/p>\n

        Vrhovni sud ovo smatra neta\u010dnim \u2013 navodi da su Milenkovi\u0107 i Suvajd\u017ei\u0107 na sudu pri\u010dali o \u010dinjenicama koje su im \u201eli\u010dno poznate, kako su i od koga do\u0161li do odre\u0111enih saznanja i informacija\u201c, i da su se, osim u detaljima, \u201eu svemu saglasno izja\u0161njavali\u201c.<\/p>\n

        Preispitivanje zakonitosti DLT traka<\/strong><\/p>\n

        Vrhovni sud je primetio jo\u0161 jednu protivre\u010dnost Apelacionog suda koja se ti\u010de klju\u010dnog dokaza \u2013 DLT traka sa baznih stanica mobilne telefonije. Listinzi mobilne telefonije su klju\u010dni dokaz tu\u017eila\u0161tva koji locira Kuraka i Romi\u0107a u blizini mesta ubistva i pokazuje u\u010destalu dinamiku komunikacije sa Milanom Radonji\u0107em u vreme neposredno uo\u010di i nakon likvidacije.<\/p>\n

        Odbrana je sve vreme osporavala zakonitost i autenti\u010dnost ovih traka, i tra\u017eila njihovo izbacivanje iz dokaza.\u00a0Apelacioni sud je u junu 2018. godine<\/a>, dok je jo\u0161 trajala prva runda su\u0111enja pred Vi\u0161im sudom, utvrdio da su trake zakonito pribavljene i vratio ih me\u0111u dokaze.<\/p>\n

        Donose\u0107i spornu presudu pet godina kasnije, peto\u010dlano apelaciono ve\u0107e je najpre navelo da prihvata argumentaciju Apelacionog suda iz juna 2018, i da se zato ne\u0107e upu\u0161tati u pitanje zakonitosti ovog dokaza. Nekoliko strana kasnije, me\u0111utim, kako konstatuje i Vrhovni sud, apelaciono ve\u0107e postaje kontradiktorno i nejasno:<\/p>\n

        \"\"<\/p>\n

        Prema presudi Vrhovnog suda, iz ovoga je nejasno koji to dokaz uop\u0161te Apelacioni sud analizira, i navodi da se iz njihovog obrazlo\u017eenja zaklju\u010duje da prethodno prihva\u0107eni dokaz ipak smatraju nezakonito pribavljenim. Tako\u0111e, kad je re\u010d o zamerki da nije obavljeno ve\u0161ta\u010denje ovih traka, Vrhovni sud navodi da je upravo Apelacioni sud imao mogu\u0107nost da zatra\u017ei to ve\u0161ta\u010denje. To nije u\u010dinio.<\/p>\n

        Tako\u0111e, isti\u010de Vrhovni sud, apelaciono ve\u0107e uop\u0161te nije interpretiralo niti analiziralo sadr\u017einu tog dokaza, \u201ea prilikom njegove ocene je na\u0161ao da isti nije verodostojan i da je nepouzdan\u201c.<\/p>\n

        U pitanju je, naime, komunikacija izme\u0111u Radonji\u0107a, Romi\u0107a i Kuraka od 9. do 12. aprila, \u010diji su brojevi telefona taksativno navedeni i u kojoj je nazna\u010den i broj telefonske kartice Radomira Markovi\u0107a sa svim podacima o vremenu, tipu saobra\u0107aja, trajanju, \u0107elijama i adresama baznih stanica preko kojih se odvijala komunikacija.<\/p>\n

        \u201eDrugostepeni sud i u odnosu na jednu od klju\u010dnih \u010dinjenica koja je bila predmet dokazivanja u postupku daje razloge koji su potpuno nejasni i u znatnoj meri protivre\u010dni, zbog \u010dega tako\u0111e nije mogu\u0107e ispitati zakonitost i pravilnost presude \u010dime je tako\u0111e u\u010dinjena bitna povreda odredaba krivi\u010dnog postupka\u201c, isti\u010de Vrhovni sud u svojoj presudi.<\/p>\n

        Uprkos ovim nalazima Vrhovnog suda, koji pokazuju da je Apelacioni sud povredio zakon u korist okrivljenih, pravosna\u017ena presuda se ne mo\u017ee preina\u010diti.<\/p>\n

        Po\u010detkom ove godine, \u0107erka ubijenog novinara\u00a0Jelena \u0106uruvija\u00a0i Slavko \u0106uruvija fondacija podneli su\u00a0disciplinske prijave Visokom savetu sudstva<\/a>\u00a0protiv troje sudija iz apelacionog ve\u0107a koje je donelo spornu presudu. Tako\u0111e, u toku je proces pred Ustavnim sudom koji treba da donese ocenu ustavnosti zakonskih odredaba koje trenutno ne dozvoljavaju \u017ealbu na preina\u010duju\u0107u osloba\u0111aju\u0107u presudu, \u010dak i ako se utvrdi, kao \u0161to je ovde slu\u010daj, da je ona doneta uz povrede zakona.<\/p>\n

        Izvor:\u00a0Cenzolovka<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Cenzolovka detaljno analizira presudu Vrhovnog suda koja pokazuje kako je Apelacioni sud, prema oceni Vrhovnog, osporavao klju\u010dne izjave i dokaze neta\u010dnim citiranjem svedoka i protivre\u010dnim argumentima. Time je napravljen teren za dono\u0161enje osloba\u0111aju\u0107e presude za ubistvo Slavka \u0106uruvije, koje se dogodilo na Uskrs 11. aprila 1999. godine, nakon \u0161to je ovog novinara danima pratilo 27 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":78474,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1201],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-117024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news_belgrade"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija – SafeJournalists<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sr_RS\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija – SafeJournalists\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Cenzolovka detaljno analizira presudu Vrhovnog suda koja pokazuje kako je Apelacioni sud, prema oceni Vrhovnog, osporavao klju\u010dne izjave i dokaze neta\u010dnim citiranjem svedoka i protivre\u010dnim argumentima. Time je napravljen teren za dono\u0161enje osloba\u0111aju\u0107e presude za ubistvo Slavka \u0106uruvije, koje se dogodilo na Uskrs 11. aprila 1999. godine, nakon \u0161to je ovog novinara danima pratilo 27 […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SafeJournalists\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-09T11:07:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-20T11:08:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"960\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"IJAS\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Napisano od\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"IJAS\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Procenjeno vreme \u010ditanja\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minuta\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"IJAS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/person\/5887a5efdaf43ea14d6579ee3c7f5467\"},\"headline\":\"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-09T11:07:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-20T11:08:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/\"},\"wordCount\":1443,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"News Belgrade\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/\",\"name\":\"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija – SafeJournalists\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-09T11:07:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-20T11:08:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":960,\"caption\":\"foto: Pixabay\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/?lang=sr\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/\",\"name\":\"SafeJournalists.net\",\"description\":\"The Regional Platform for Media Freedom and Security of Journalists is a network of journalists' associations and media unions from the Western Balkans.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#organization\",\"name\":\"SafeJournalists.net\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/logo-safejournalists.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/logo-safejournalists.png\",\"width\":960,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"SafeJournalists.net\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/person\/5887a5efdaf43ea14d6579ee3c7f5467\",\"name\":\"IJAS\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sr-RS\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d5cb1872d62de4af13db3702f56bfc63?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d5cb1872d62de4af13db3702f56bfc63?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"IJAS\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/author\/ijas\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija – SafeJournalists","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/","og_locale":"sr_RS","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija – SafeJournalists","og_description":"Cenzolovka detaljno analizira presudu Vrhovnog suda koja pokazuje kako je Apelacioni sud, prema oceni Vrhovnog, osporavao klju\u010dne izjave i dokaze neta\u010dnim citiranjem svedoka i protivre\u010dnim argumentima. Time je napravljen teren za dono\u0161enje osloba\u0111aju\u0107e presude za ubistvo Slavka \u0106uruvije, koje se dogodilo na Uskrs 11. aprila 1999. godine, nakon \u0161to je ovog novinara danima pratilo 27 […]","og_url":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/","og_site_name":"SafeJournalists","article_published_time":"2026-04-09T11:07:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-20T11:08:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":960,"url":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"IJAS","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Napisano od":"IJAS","Procenjeno vreme \u010ditanja":"8 minuta"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/"},"author":{"name":"IJAS","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/person\/5887a5efdaf43ea14d6579ee3c7f5467"},"headline":"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija","datePublished":"2026-04-09T11:07:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-20T11:08:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/"},"wordCount":1443,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg","articleSection":["News Belgrade"],"inLanguage":"sr-RS"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/","url":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/","name":"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija – SafeJournalists","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg","datePublished":"2026-04-09T11:07:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-20T11:08:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sr-RS","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/judge-1587300_1280.jpg","width":1280,"height":960,"caption":"foto: Pixabay"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/sta-je-sve-sporno-u-presudi-apelacionog-suda-u-slucaju-curuvija\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/?lang=sr"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u0160ta je sve sporno u presudi Apelacionog suda u slu\u010daju \u0106uruvija"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/","name":"SafeJournalists.net","description":"The Regional Platform for Media Freedom and Security of Journalists is a network of journalists' associations and media unions from the Western Balkans.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sr-RS"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#organization","name":"SafeJournalists.net","url":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/logo-safejournalists.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/logo-safejournalists.png","width":960,"height":540,"caption":"SafeJournalists.net"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/person\/5887a5efdaf43ea14d6579ee3c7f5467","name":"IJAS","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sr-RS","@id":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d5cb1872d62de4af13db3702f56bfc63?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d5cb1872d62de4af13db3702f56bfc63?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"IJAS"},"url":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/author\/ijas\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117024"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117024"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117024\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":117025,"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117024\/revisions\/117025"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78474"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/safejournalists.net\/sr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}