Other threats to journalists, Getoarbe Muliqi and Dinko Gruhonjić, 16.06.2026.

Other threats to journalists, Getoarbe Muliqi and Dinko Gruhonjić, 16.06.2026.

Translations: Beograd 

  • Case info

  • Personal info

  • Regional center
    Belgrade
  • Who was attacked?
    Journalist
  • Gender
    Man
  • Victim(s) name
    Dinko Gruhonjić
  • Media outlet

  • Name of the media outlet
    Autonomija
  • Type of media platform
    Online Media
  • Source of information about the incident
    NDNV
  • Incident Data

  • Date of incident
    16.06.2026
  • City
    Beograd
  • Were authorities informed?
    Case was not reported to the authorities
  • Perpetrator(s)
    Not known
  • Means of incidents and attacks
    Through media outlets (broadcast, print, online)
  • Type of incident
    Other threats to journalists
  • Type of threat
    Aggressive, harassing or discriminatory statements
  • Action by the authorities

  • Type of violation
    Security threat
    Other
  • Action taken by the journalists' association

  • Was journalist's association informed by the journalists directly?
    Yes
  • What was the reaction of the journalists' association?
    The association reacted publicly

University professor and program director of the Independent Association of Journalists of Vojvodina (NDNV) Dinko Gruhonjić, after the publication of the analysis on media reporting on dealing with the past in the Western Balkans, together with researcher and executive director of the Association of Journalists of Kosovo (UNK) Getoarbe Mulići, as the authors of the analysis on media reporting on dealing with the past in the Western Balkans, experienced verbal attacks of hate speech and heavy targeting after the publication of the document.

The campaign began with an article published in the tabloid Informer under the title “Dinko and the ‘Shiptar’ journalist supported the blockaders and attacked Serbia”, in which the authors were exposed to derogatory, ethnically colored and inflammatory labeling.

In the text, their professional work and research is presented as an attack on Serbia, with Mulić being targeted because of his Albanian ethnic identity, and Gruhonjić through political labeling and long-term discrediting campaigns.

Of particular concern is the subsequent announcement by the Ministry of Information and Telecommunications of the Republic of Serbia, in which the Ministry looks back on the aforementioned analysis and mentions its authors by name in an extremely negative context. We consider it inappropriate for a ministry to publicly single out individual authors and question their credibility, motives and professional integrity. By emphasizing the identity and previous public engagement of the author, instead of addressing the issues raised in the research findings, the Ministry risks contributing to an environment in which journalists and researchers become targets of public pressure and intimidation.