Home Blog Page 44

Coalition for the Fight against Hate Speech and Hate Crime calls on the competent institutions to urgently sanction and qualify the hate crime that happened in Bratunac

0

On the occasion of the physical attack that took place on June 23 in Bratunac, in which Osman Mehanović suffered serious bodily injuries accompanied by insults and threats based on ethnicity, the Coalition for Combating Hate Speech and Hate Crime calls on the competent institutions to urgently prosecute the committed criminal act and act aimed at preventing similar attacks.

We invite the media in BiH to report on this criminal act with a focus on the institutional response, and to continuously monitor the further actions of the competent Prosecutor’s Office. During 2023, we witnessed an increase in the presence of hate speech in the public space, as well as criminal acts committed out of hatred, after which the public was mostly informed about “convictions”, but not about the sanctions that the institutions are obliged to implement.

We also demand from the institutions for the protection of human rights in BiH and representatives of the authorities to publicly condemn and sanction any criminal offense committed out of hatred, as well as to take concrete measures to prevent it and ensure the safety and dignity of the citizens of BiH in accordance with their competencies. It is necessary that the institutions deal more seriously with the phenomena of increased speech in the public space, hate crimes, prevention, but also sanctions, which will send a clear message to citizens that violence in communities in BiH will not be tolerated.

We appeal to the media and civil society organizations to actively monitor the institutional response to this crime and insist on criminal responsibility for the perpetrators.

We expect institutions to do their work in accordance with their competences and prosecute those responsible for inciting hatred and all forms of violence and hate crimes against other persons on the basis of the law. We remind you that in the Criminal Code of the RS, as prescribed in Article 123, paragraph 1, point 21) of this Code, a criminal offense committed out of hatred is defined as: or ethnicity, language, religious belief, skin color, gender or sexual orientation, health status or gender identity of a person”.

Members of the Coalition to Fight Hate Speech and Hate Crimes
Association for Democratic Initiatives from Sarajevo
KVART Youth Center from Prijedor
Civil Rights Defenders from Sarajevo
CURE Foundation from Sarajevo
MediaCenter Foundation Sarajevo from Sarajevo
Youth Initiative for Human Rights of Bosnia and Herzegovina from Sarajevo
Otaharin from Bijeljina
Youth Newspaper Association in Bosnia and Herzegovina (ONA) from Sarajevo
Sarajevo Open Center from Sarajevo
BH Journalists Association from Sarajevo
Press and Online Media Council in Bosnia and Herzegovina from Sarajevo
Tuzla Open Center from Tuzla

The investigation against Nikola Morača, Boris Lakić and Siniša Trkulja has been suspended

0

The District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Banja Luka suspended the investigation against the responsible editor of “EuroBlic” Siniša Trkulja, the director of development and executive editor for online media of “EuroBlic” Boris Lakić and the journalist Nikola Morača.

They were suspected of the criminal offense of breaching the secrecy of proceedings in the case of the publication of a text about rape that was reported in Banja Luka in February of this year.

The prosecutor, in his order on the suspension of the investigation, stated that there is not enough evidence to confirm that the suspects, at the time of publication of the disputed text, undoubtedly knew that they were publishing information that an employee of the PU could not provide.

Trkulja, in a statement to “Nezavisne novine”, thanked all his colleagues and people who supported EuroBlic and the Srpskainfo portal in the past months and added that EuroBlic and Srpskainfo will continue to work professionally and at the service of readers, not individuals.

“This suspension of the investigation is another proof that the journalists of EuroBlic and Srpskainfo do their work in an extremely professional manner, and we will continue to do so in the future,” said Trkulja.

He also recalled the inappropriate behavior of high officials who gave inappropriate statements during the investigation.

“Perhaps it would have been better for them to have waited for the end of the investigation, instead of listening to their closest collaborators, so they showed in public who is trying to influence the investigation and in what way.” Well, the prosecution established that Morača has good and accurate sources. I wonder what we will do with those who publicly presented unverified information regarding this case”, concluded Trkulja.

Source: Nezavisne novine

Italy: Support for Roberto Saviano, defendant in a SLAPP case filed by Giorgia Meloni

0
photo: canva

The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) joins the undersigned international media freedom and journalists’ organisations and stands in solidarity with Roberto Saviano as he attended the fourth Court hearing in the SLAPP case initiated by the Prime Minister of Italy on 27 June 2023. We call on judges to recognise that Saviano has committed no crime and urge Prime Minister Meloni to withdraw her criminal complaint. We further demand that politicians stop abusing the law by initiating strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) against journalists, writers and anyone else exercising their right to free expression. We also call on the Italian Parliament to adopt, without further delay, a comprehensive reform of defamation laws in line with international freedom of expression standards.

The lawsuit against Saviano was filed by Giorgia Meloni in November 2021, when she was an MP and prior to becoming Italy’s Prime Minister. The charges of aggravated criminal defamation were brought against Saviano at the behest of Meloni for his critical remarks about Meloni’s long-standing anti-migrant rhetoric which he had expressed during a televised program, Piazza Pulita. Saviano’s remarks followed Piazza Pulita’s coverage of the death of a six-month-old baby from Guinea who was among migrants who drowned in the Mediterranean after Italian authorities delayed their rescue operations.

During the fourth hearing at the Criminal Court of Rome, Piazza Pulita anchorman Corrado Formigli and Amnesty International Italia’s spokesperson Riccardo Noury testified in court. Recalling Amnesty’s report which examined hate speech during the 2018 Italian electoral campaign, Noury testified to the role of Meloni in promoting an anti-migrant narrative articulated around hate and xenophobia. At the conclusion of the hearing, the judge rejected the request formulated by the defence to audit Meloni. Meloni has not appeared in any of the four Court hearings held to date, despite having initiated legal action against Saviano for aggravated criminal defamation claiming his remarks had damaged her honour and reputation. The judge scheduled the next hearing for October 12, 2023, when a first instance sentence is expected to be issued.

Article 595 of the Italian criminal code provides for prison sentences of up to three years for criminal defamation. This law threatens freedom of expression, a fundamental right protected by the Italian Constitution and international law, and hinders journalists and writers from expressing their opinions on matters of public interest. In a democratic society, it is unacceptable for a criminal defamation lawsuit to be used as a weapon to silence critical voices.

Under international freedom of expression standards, the right to freedom of expression encompasses the freedom to express opinions and ideas that may be considered offensive, shocking, or disturbing. Moreover, the ECtHR and domestic courts have clarified that public figures, especially those in political roles, should expect a higher degree of criticism and scrutiny due to their prominent position in society. Criminal prosecution of critics in such cases is deemed to infringe the right to freedom of expression as outlined in Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

The escalating occurrence of vexatious lawsuits targeting journalists in Italy is deeply concerning. Members of the current government are increasingly abusing the law against individuals who express dissenting views. This shows that press freedom and civic space in Italy is shrinking, with dangerous implications for Italy’s democracy.

We acknowledge that a number of bills directed at reforming defamation provisions are currently being discussed by the Italian parliament. We are particularly concerned as the proposed provisions violate international standards on freedom of expression and Article 10 of the ECHR as they substantially increase fines for criminal defamation and impose additional penalties of disqualification from practising the journalistic profession. As the European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly stated, criminal defamation sanctions have a serious chilling effect on freedom of expression.

Comprehensive reforms of defamation laws in Italy must be aligned with international freedom of expression standards and should focus on decriminalising defamation and establishing reasonable limits on damages within civil law to protect press freedom, free expression, and the public’s right to know. Italy should also support the strongest set of anti-SLAPP protections in the forthcoming negotiations over the EU anti-SLAPP Directive.

Our organisations will keep monitoring the current defamation proceedings against Roberto Saviano and will respond to any additional threats to media freedom in Italy.

 

Signed 

  • OBC Transeuropa (OBCT)
  • European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)
  • European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)
  • Index on Censorship
  • International Press Institute (IPI)
  • ARTICLE 19 Europe
  • Justice for Journalists Foundation (JFJ)
  • The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation
  • Blueprint for Free Speech
  • Meglio Legale
  • The Good Lobby
  • PEN International

Turkey: EFJ demands release of journalist Merdan Yanardağ

0
photo: canva

Journalist Merdan Yanardağ, editor-in-chief of Turkish broadcaster TELE1, was arrested on 27 June following a judicial investigation into his televised remarks about imprisoned Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) leader Abdullah Öcalan. The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) demands his immediate release.

Yanardağ was charged with “praising crime and the criminal” as well as “propaganda for a terrorist organisation”, following his comments about Öcalan during a television programme broadcast on TELE1 on 20 June. During his speech, Yanardağ said, “Öcalan is Turkey’s longest serving political prisoner. If normal execution laws were applicable, he should in fact be released… The isolation imposed on Öcalan has no legal basis.”

After spending the night in police custody, Yanardağ was taken to Çağlayan court in Istanbul to be questioned by the prosecutor’s office. In accordance with the prosecutor’s request, the court remanded Yanardağ in custody for “propaganda” crime.

The chairman of the Turkish broadcasting regulator RTÜK, Ebubekir Şahin, also announced on 25 June that an investigation had been opened against the TELE1 channel over Yanardağ’s remarks, arguing Yanardağ “praised the terrorist leader”.

“We demand the immediate release of journalist Merdan Yanardağ, who was only doing his job by commenting on the state censorship of Abdullah Öcalan in Turkey,” said EFJ President Maja Sever. “Our colleague was absolutely right to express his doubts about this censorship. We fully share his feelings. His imprisonment is a totally disproportionate act of repression and intimidation. It is not only a violation of press freedom but also a serious attack on freedom of expression and the right of Turkish citizens to be informed.”

The High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council issued an opinion on the criminalization of defamation

0

The High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina (HJPC) has finally announced the Draft Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Srpska, which after 20 years re-criminalizes defamation and introduces criminal offenses of insulting honor and reputation in the RS.

The members of this body held a telephone session only after they received fierce criticism from the public, especially from the journalistic community, for not expressing their position on the criminalization of defamation and insult, which they should have been the first to speak out about.

The HJPC stated in its statement that these issues concern them and that they “affect the judiciary of Republika Srpska” and expressed reservations about individual members.

“The council acts within the limits of its clear powers and role in the judiciary, that is, by exact interpretations of legal standards,” they stated in the announcement.

The Supreme Court of Justice warned that prescribing an inappropriate penalty for defamation could lead to self-censorship, and that sanctioning could have the consequence of restricting the right to freedom, which is a pillar of building a democratic society.

The HJPC warned that the legislative and executive authorities should take this into account. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court of Justice did not decide negatively on the government’s desire to criminalize defamation.

“From the accompanying material of the content of the provisions of the Draft Law, the question of the purpose and consideration of the aspect of necessity for the mentioned legal provisions is not explained. Prescribing a punishment for the maladjusted personality of the perpetrator would have the effect of self-censorship. “Sanctioning can potentially result in an unjustified restriction of the enjoyment of the right to freedom of expression as a pillar of the construction of a democratic society, which the executive and legislative authorities should take into account,” the statement said.

The advice further indicates that it is necessary to take care that the description of the act and its consequences is not very broad and potentially arbitrary in practical application.

“That would be in direct conflict with the practice of the European Court and the Resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe towards the decriminalization of defamation 1577 (2007). Due to all of the above, in the absence of clear explanations of the standards of the European Court, compliance with the Constitution, and the absence of reference to comparative practices, the Council expresses a reservation against the aforementioned provisions of the Draft Law,” said the statement of the Supreme Court of Justice.

You can read the complete opinion of HJPC HERE.

The challenge is communication with institutions, the LGBTQA community is more open

0

Journalists on reporting from Bh. Pride March.

The fourth Bh. Pride March was held in Sarajevo on Saturday – the pride march with somewhat weaker and less visible security measures than before, and the more relaxed atmosphere is noticed by journalists who say that positive changes are visible.

The media have a significant contribution in how the public will perceive the Pride, and with professional, fair and accurate reporting, they fulfill the public’s right to timely and reliable information. Mediacenter Sarajevo followed the work of journalists in the field and recorded their reporting experiences – from the accessibility of interlocutors, organizers, participants, to logistical details essential for journalistic work.

Tahir Žustra, reporter of  Nova BH followed all four Bh. pride marches. His coverage of this event includes several days of reporting on the event itself, but also on important topics before and after the Parade. “Logistical information, safety of participants, support of society and community, messages aimed at decision makers in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) – all four years were the focus of Nova TV’s reporting,” says Žustra.

In the context of professional journalism that Nova BH strives for, he adds, this event is no different from any other protest, walk, gathering or event based on the demands of individuals and groups to fulfill their rights. He says that it is always a challenge to offer viewers an objective picture of the event itself supported by facts, relevant information and relevant interlocutors and to offer insight into the current context of why something is happening.

“That’s why it’s always important to talk to the participants themselves from an event like the Pride Parade, for which the parade is organized – to hear first-hand the importance of such a protest and the messages that have addresses to which they are addressed; with government representatives – who directly or indirectly influence decisions that could mean greater freedom and better satisfaction of basic human rights; but also with the civil sector, the international community, embassies – who can offer practical examples from their own communities”, explains Žustra.

This year, N1 reporter Dragica Gajić reported for the first time from Bosnia and Herzegovina. pride parades and that, she tells us, is a special experience for her.

“That’s why just reporting on the LGBTIQ+ community seems like a big challenge to me. First of all, I am thinking about the way of reporting and presenting everything that is a pride parade. Ever since I found out that I will be reporting from the Parade, I have been trying to “sort out” in my head all the problems they face, which are everyday. Starting with discrimination, hate speech, rejection, physical and online attacks,” Gajić told Mediacentar.

Journalist of the Balkan Investigative Network – Detektor.ba, Azra Husarić Omerović, has reported from every Parade so far. He talks about the challenges in reporting for Mediacentar.
“Starting from the first procession to this one today, the biggest challenge is communication with the institutions from which we need answers. Whether it is a question of police agencies, authorities, councils or assemblies, they have very similar formulas of behavior, from ignoring inquiries and requests for the delivery of data, documents, to absolute intolerance towards this topic, which they manifest through spreading hatred towards the LGBT community, as well as all those who are allies in their struggle to exercise their rights,” says Husarić Omerović, who, due to her professional and objective reporting on the relationship between institutions before the procession, was exposed to bot attacks and discredits in the online sphere.

BHT1 journalist Adisa Herco reported from Bh. pride march for the second time this year. She tells Mediacentar that the biggest challenge in reporting is to remain objective in a situation where human rights are not respected. “We live in a country where rights are regulated only on paper. Their implementation in practice is a big challenge and, accordingly, it is also a challenge to be objective when reporting on people who take concrete steps and point out the shortcomings of the system they live in,” says Herco.

Journalist and editor of eTrafika Vanja Stokić has been following the Parade for years, and she tells Mediacentar that the most difficult thing for her is to tell the entire story surrounding the Parade, which most people do not understand and why it is important for it to happen and what it means, in sufficiently simple language. “So that maybe she can reach those who are against her. It seems to me that people have already become numb to the constant phrases we repeat, like ‘the fight for human rights’, ‘rights guaranteed by the constitution’ and the like. I think that those words no longer reach them because we all forced them, so they became immune,” says Stokić about the challenges.

While journalists face challenges of an ethical nature, finding interlocutors and the like, the biggest challenge in photojournalistic reporting from the procession is the speed of work.

“There are a lot of challenges, but from the photojournalist side it is to take good photos, to give as much and as quick information as possible to my colleagues in the newsroom so that they can inform the readers as detailed and as quickly as possible about what is happening, and that I do not miss to photograph someone in the crowd during the procession from famous people who came to support the Procession”, explains Klix.ba photojournalist Davorin Sekulić for Mediacentar Sarajevo. He says that the cooperation with the organizers of the Parade is excellent, and the journalists we talked to have the same experience. “I really have to praise the organizers. The members of the organizing committee are up to their task and are always ready to answer journalists, aware of the fact how important it is for their voice to be heard in public,” says BHT1 reporter Adisa Herco.

Nova BH journalist Tahir Žustra says that the press service of the Pride Parade is characterized by a high level of professionalism in communication and cooperation with the media. “Very thorough, detailed in information, accommodating and flexible in adjusting program contents and open to help in searching for relevant interlocutors, this event and the activists behind it make professionals”, says Žustra.

N1 journalist Dragica Gajić says that she is surprised and pleased by the friendliness of the organizers of the Pride, who, she says, are accessible 24 hours a day and understand the work of journalists. “And our desire to have timely and accurate information,” adds Gajić.

Detektor.ba journalist Azra Husarić Omerović says that the organizers of the Parade are generally very open and approachable, even though they themselves have very limited free time for communication, because they work full-time at other jobs, and freely donate theirs to the Parade. “Through members of the Organizing Committee, we reach community members, some of them we protect their identity, some are ready to speak publicly, all in accordance with the agreement through Bh. pride march”, says Husarić Omerović.

The LGBTIQA community increasingly opens to working with the media

In relation to the first Bh. the pride parade held in 2019, when the public was much more divided and when many feared for their safety, remembering the attack on visitors to Merlinka in 2008, this year everyone is much more open. From citizens to members of the LGBTIQA community. “The changes are evident because as the years pass, there are more and more participants in the procession, and less and less fear, which I consider very important. I am glad that there have been no incidents during the procession so far and that the participants are therefore more relaxed, which in my opinion is very important because it is automatically much easier to find someone to talk to,” says Klix.ba photojournalist Davorin Sekulić.

However, our interlocutors have different experiences when it comes to finding interlocutors to create a journalistic story. Some say that after four processions it is easier to find interlocutors, and some even now have difficulties in finding interlocutors. “Even though I haven’t had the opportunity to report on the Pride Parade, I have interviewed LGBTIQ people. Therefore, I can say that there is a visible shift when it comes to their openness. It is easier for us journalists to ask questions, when we know that the interlocutor will answer them honestly”, is the experience of journalist Dragica Gajić.

BHT1 journalist Adisa Herco says that she has never had a problem finding interlocutors on the topic of Parades. “The difference between availability now and then is that they are even more willing to come out with their stories,” says Herco and adds that the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina have accepted all this as an important segment of the functioning of the society in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

This time, as in previous years, she managed to get and talk to the interlocutors, especially people who are part of the community or allies of Povorci and Detektor journalist Azra Husarić Omerović. It seems to her that the public has become more aware and open, so today it is less of a taboo topic to talk to citizens, but also to employers who were previously used for political manipulation, as the parade threatens their business. “Thus, we are witnessing that security measures are in decline compared to previous years, so the stigma and strictness around this topic has loosened in society by a small, but still significant percentage. These small steps are an indication that we can become a better society, more tolerant and accessible to all who make it up,” says Husarić Omerović.

Tahir Žustra notes that over the past four years, there has been an evident greater awareness of society on topics and reports that treat the position of LGBTIQA persons in Bosnia and Herzegovina. “At the same time, it is evident that there is a slightly greater freedom of direct participants in events such as the Pride, who, upon prior request and completely voluntarily, decide to participate in the filming and production of various content for the needs of television reports. There are more and more young people who are ready to talk about their needs, demands, feelings, expectations in the context of improving basic human rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina. This greatly facilitates the work of media workers in the field, but also obligates them not to deviate from professional and ethical reporting, fully respecting the dignity, credibility and dignity of all interlocutors, from all sides as far as human rights in BiH are concerned,” says the Nova BH reporter.

Journalist Vanja Stokić has a slightly different experience, and she says that it is difficult to find people from the community who are ready to talk, especially if you are making a video contribution.
“There are a few interlocutors who are ready to expose themselves, but most are closed. However, it is completely understandable. Not everyone is driven, not everyone wants to draw public attention to themselves, they are not empowered enough for that. There are many reasons why people stay away from the media. But if it is a problem for us in reporting, it is. When you have a few people who are ready to appear in the media, the public creates the wrong image that the community consists of only a few of them. It seems to me that the situation is improving a little, that people are opening up over the years. I actually have some ‘own’ interlocutors with whom I have already established a relationship of trust”, is the experience of journalist Stokić.

Why is it important to report from the Pride March?

For the participants of the procession, it is the most important day of the year for the development of democratic society. Journalists report daily on numerous protests, human rights, marginalized groups, hate speech, but also on political and other topics. However, they agree that reporting from the Pride march is particularly important. “Reporting from the Pride is important for two things: listening and understanding. Listening in the context of all disenfranchised people in BiH who in this way want to draw attention to their degraded position and neglected rights, and understanding on the other hand because society needs to know the real facts in order to reduce the space for speculation, false allegations, passive aggression, violence and the like. Without listening with a true will to be heard, there can be no understanding, and that’s why professional media play a key role here,” says journalist Tahir Žustra.

Professional media reporting, for Detektor’s journalist, is important for sending the right messages, and being present at the Parade is important so that we don’t allow hate speech, misinformation, fake news and political narrative to dominate everything that the Pride communicates. “And those are equal rights and opportunities for everyone and love. Our role is to be guardians of the truth and to pass it on, in order to stop the spread of intolerance and to prevent the political powers from manipulating the victims of the system again to gain their political points,” says Husarić Omerović.

Dragica Gajić says that the only way for the public to support LGBTIQA people is to be aware of the problems they face. “In this context, the role of the media is crucial. I hope that the time will soon come when we realize that the LGBTIQ community is an inseparable part of Bosnian and Herzegovinian society”, says Gajić.

Davorin Sekulić observes that after several years of reporting on the Pride march, the citizens of BiH have a clearer picture of what the Pride March actually is. “The media plays a very important role in all of this, because the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina get most of their information from the media, and therefore it is very important to report on the March because that way everyone else can better understand the meaning of the procession and why these people are actually walking,” says Sekulić.

It is always important to be part of an event where people fight for their rights, says BHT1 journalist Adisa Herco. “In this case, it is a basic right guaranteed by the Constitution, the observance of which will bring BiH closer to the countries of the European Union (EU) and bring democracy and hope that the struggle can win and fight for the rights of individuals to love and be loved,” says Herco.

Reporting from Bh. pride march is important for the same reasons why we report on other protests, says the journalist and editor of eTrafika. “The LGBTIQ community has the right to go out on the streets and demand their rights, just like single mothers, pensioners, demobilized fighters, miners… Just as we report on them and advocate for their more dignified life, we should do the same for community”, concludes Stokić.

Journalists are this year in the eyes of the organizers of Bh. pride march are recognized as allies who can contribute to greater visibility of the LGBTIQA community by conveying their authentic experiences, reporting accurately and professionally, and during the parade, among others, messages “in solidarity with journalists” could be heard.

How the state uses Telekom Srbija to found media

0
photo: N1

In cooperation with the news channel Euronews from France, Serbia’s Telekom launched Euronews Serbia in 2021. Even though the state leadership said Euronews would contribute to media pluralism, they actually obscured the fact that the state was entering the ownership of the media.

By launching Euronews, the state-owned Telekom wanted to compete with SBB, that is, with United Group that already had N1 TV but also expanded its media portfolio to include dailies Danas and Nova, the Nova.rs website and Nova TV.

“When we founded the Sport Klub channel, they bought Arena, when we started making TV series, they started making TV series, when we launched EON, they came up with a platform, when we started internet for the diaspora, they did the same and so on. They are always lagging behind us and I have never seen an original idea on their side,” United Group Vice President Dragica Pilipovic Chaffey told the N1 documentary “Thorn in the Side”.

Vesna Radojevic, journalist and editor of the “Raskrinkavanje” portal, assessed that this was “just a political basis.”

“It’s just a political basis to say, well, we have those televisions, you can also hear a different opinion on those stations, so not everything is so bad as far as the media and media freedom in Serbia are concerned,” Radojevic said.

Such practice is not in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Serbia, because Article 32 of the Law on Public Information and Media stipulates that the state may not establish media, even indirectly. Yet one gets the impression that the state did just that through Telekom.

The Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM) issued a license to Euronews without questioning the fact that Telekom is its beneficial owner.

Supreme Court of Serbia judge (2005 – 2009) Vida Petrovic Skero admitted that she “really doubts that REM ever checked all that correctly.”

Telekom seems to have tried to outsmart the law by not being the direct founder of that media, but rather the owner of Euronews via its daughter company Arena News Channels.

“If the founder is a child, daughter, son, grandchild or someone’s mother – is the actual founder indirectly, as the legislator says, or directly financed by those who are not allowed to establish media outlets? I believe that when citizens reflect about the television and its owner, there is nobody who does not think that if Telekom is behind everything, that it is not state interference and intervention in the formation and functioning of media outlets, which according to the law is not right,” said Petrovic Skero.

Such practice is not allowed even in the European Union. That is why the influence of Telekom Srbija worries the European Commission, which mentioned this telecommunications company in its progress reports for 2020, 2021, and 2022. Telekom was also included in the European Commission’s 2023 semi-annual report.

Media and journalism Professor at the University of Ljubljana Marko Milosavljevic explain that in European Union member countries state telecoms have almost no role, and especially no influence on the media landscape in the country.

“They have neither those pretensions nor desires, but even if they did, there are legal restrictions, and also restrictions at the level of the European Union and the European Commission, especially in the area of competition protection, because it is clear that the state cannot own media,” stressed Milosavljevic.

Germany: Journalists’ organisations criticise Axel Springer’s plans to cut 200 jobs

0
photo: canva

Germany’s top-selling tabloid Bild announced that it will cut about 200 jobs and close about one-third of its regional editions across the country. The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) joined its affiliates in Germany, the DJV and dju in ver.di, in opposing the plans of publisher Axel Springer SE and calling for no journalists to be dismissed.

The move comes after the company launched a major shift to go totally digital this year. Citing an email sent to the staff on Monday 19 June 2023, The Guardian first reported that the Bild would “parting ways with colleagues who have tasks that in the digital world are performed by AI and/or automated processes”. The information was later denied by Axel Springer, who said in a statement that the job cuts were in no way AI-related, but part of a restructuring of its regional press operations.

The German Journalists’ Association (DJV) strongly criticised the planned job cuts: “If the CEO Mathias Döpfner wants to slaughter the group’s cash cow, this is not only antisocial towards the employees but also economically extremely stupid. BILD is still Axel Springer’s profit earner. Less regional reporting means less reader service and thus fewer readers,” said DJV Chairman Frank Überall. “There must be no layoffs. In such a large media group, the affected employees must be offered alternative jobs. Springer owes this to its people,” Überall added.

“With the increasing distribution channels, digital journalism needs more colleagues in the editorial offices, not fewer. The use of AI cannot take over the human creativity, classification of research and journalistic responsibility that journalists stand for,” warned Christoph Schmitz, member of the ver.di national board and responsible for media.

Despite inflation, the energy crisis and the Ukraine war, the group made good money in 2022 with annual sales of 3.9 billion euros and a profit of three-quarters of a billion euros, according to ver.di.

BIRODI: Prosecutor named to investigate report on REM

0
photo: N1

The Belgrade-based Bureau for Social Research (BIRODI) said on Friday that an organized crime prosecutor had been named to investigate its report on the Regulatory Body for Electronic Media (REM).

A BIRODI press release said that its report was filed with the Serbian Republic Public Prosecutor who passed it to the Public Prosecutor for Organized Crime to process. “We have been informed by the Public Prosecutor for Organized Crime that a public prosecutor has been named and has started acting on the case,” the press release said.

The REM Council and its chief Olivera Zekic have been heavily criticized by the political opposition and independent media for not reacting to violations of the Law on Electronic Media, journalists’ code while the authorities and pro-regime media have fiercely defended that body which is supposed to be an independent watchdog under Serbian law.

BIRODI monitors the media among other things, including analyses of reporting on the authorities, opposition and issues of national importance.

The press release said that BIRODI will provide more evidence of REM’s violations of the law and its own code of conduct.

“The initiative is aimed at improving the work of the REM as the supreme media authority and the sanctioning of its failure to implement the law is the first step in its institutional and personnel reform which does not end with dismissals in the REM Council but with sanctions against all those who are found to have broken the law, regulations and codes,” it said.

BIRODI said its report was also filed with the Anti-Corruption Agency.