Home Blog Page 77

BH Journalists: Gorica Dodik’s inciting rhetoric against journalists and the owner of BN Television must be sanctioned!

0

(Printscreen: Tweet published by Gorica Dodik)

Sarajevo/Banja Luka, 13/10/2022 – The Steering Committee of the BH Journalists Association and the Free Media Help Line (FMHL) strongly condemn incitement and hate speech against Vladimir Trišić, the owner and director of BN Television, as well as all employees of this media outlet, and demand from the competent institutions in the Republic of Srpska to urgently investigate and prosecute persons who threaten and spread hate speech against journalists and owners of BN through social networks.

Employees and the director of BN Television are continuously exposed to inciting rhetoric, threats and insults on social networks, which mostly come from members and sympathizers of SNSD party in the Republic of Srpska. Gorica Dodik, daughter of SNSD president and Serbian member of the Presidency of BiH Milorad Dodik, on her profile on the social network Twitter on Wednesday published photos of the high representative of the international community in BiH Christian Schmidt and the general director of BN TV Vladimir Trišić, and in the description of the photos she wrote: “Hitler and his servant“.

In an earlier post from March of this year, Gorica Dodik published on Twitter a photo of Trišić with members of his family, including his minor child, with the claim that Trišić would “burn people alive” because he is a “monster”.

The Steering Committee of the BH Journalists Association emphasizes the fact that these and similar announcements provoke numerous comments from other Twitter users, in which Trišić and the journalists of BN Television are threatened, insulted, declared “national traitors” and the like, which has the effect of directly endangering the safety of the aforementioned persons. Although Gorica Dodik is neither a public figure nor a politician, the fact is that her posts from social networks are published by numerous media in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which only further incites incitement, hatred and intolerance among the public towards those who are the subject of her tweets.

We remind that the creation of such an atmosphere a few years ago resulted in one of the heaviest attacks on journalists in Bosnia and Herzegovina – the attempted murder of BN Television journalist Vladimir Kovačević, who was severely beaten in Banja Luka. Due to all of the above, the competent institutions, above all the Ministry of Internal Affairs of RS and the Banja Luka District Public Prosecutor’s Office, must urgently and seriously deal with the spread of hate speech on social networks and prevent another “Kovačević case” from happening!

The Steering Committee of BH Journalists and the Free Media Help Line appeal to MP’s in the Parliamentary Assembly of BiH to adopt, as soon as possible, the Proposal for Amendments to the Criminal Code of BiH, which would expand the framework for sanctioning hate speech, especially on the Internet and social networks. We emphasize that the effective protection of journalists, particularly by ensuring appropriate court proceedings in cases of threats and violence against journalists and media workers, is one of the fundamental conditions that our country must fulfill on its way to membership in the European Union, which was highlighted yesterday during the recommendation for candidate status of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Coalition for Media Freedom: REM to demonstrate its independence and respect of media freedom

0
photo: N1

In its Report on Serbia’s progress in the implementation of reforms and European integration, the European Commission noted what the Coalition for Media Freedom constantly points out – that no progress has been made in freedom of expression in the past year. The experts of the European Commission note that REM (Regulatory Authority for Electronic Media) made the decision to grant licenses for national coverage to the same television channels that already have licenses even though they “received reprimands from REM for violating their legal obligations.”

Since the deadline for submitting applications for the granting of the fifth license for national coverage expired yesterday, the Coalition believes that this is an opportunity for the Regulatory Authority for Electronic Media to show in action that it is an independent regulatory body, and that it will indeed award the fifth national frequency to the best license application.

Two months ago, the REM Council decided to re-grant licenses for electronic media with national coverage to Pink, Happy, B92 and Prva televisions, regardless of the fact that they have been violating the law and Serbian Journalists’ Code of Ethics for years, and have not respected the minimum conditions prescribed by by-laws.

In addition to the fact that no market analysis was carried out, even though it is recognized as an obligation by the law and all strategic documents, including the Media Strategy, which the Coalition pointed out from the very beginning of this process, in the previous round of license allocation there was the essential explanation as to why the existing media service providers got licenses again, and why the others did not. This absence of explanation is a significant violation of the procedure involving 14 applicants, which is evident by domestic judicial practice, as well as the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.

Not all relevant facts have been established, especially with regard to the existing media service providers when it comes to facts important for the assessment of the criteria for compliance with professional and legal obligations, where the REM Council selectively, incompletely, and even incorrectly determined the facts.

In addition, the criteria were evaluated selectively, incompletely and even incorrectly in some parts, which is evident especially in the evaluation of the criteria for compliance with ethical standards and obligations – whether a measure was pronounced to a media service provider and its conduct after the measure was pronounced, whether the application for license was respected, as well as the practice in fulfilling obligations from the law (where numerous segments were not taken into account at all).

Year after year, REM’s reports showed that none of these television stations fulfilled the obligation prescribed by the Rulebook on the minimum conditions for the provision of media services and the criteria for decision-making in the process of issuing a license for the provision of media services. On the basis of the conducted public competition, it was defined that a provider of general media service must have news, science and education, culture and arts, documentary and children’s programs, as well as program for minors. Also, none of these television stations respected the application on the basis of which they were previously licensed, and the members of the REM Council consciously ignored this fact.

Due to these and numerous other omissions in the first round of licensing, lawsuits have been filed by the Slavko Curuvija Foundation and the CRTA organization, as well as by some participants in the process of awarding licenses with national coverage.

We hope that the members of the REM Council will understand the seriousness of the moment and work towards unhindered fulfillment of freedom of expression. Their previous decisions have indirectly led to the disrespect of the Serbian Journalists’ Code of Ethics and the creation of an atmosphere that fosters threats and violence against journalists.

The Coalition for Media Freedom consists of the Association of Media, the Association of Online Media (AOM), the Independent Association of Journalists of Vojvodina (NDNV), the Independent Journalists Association of Serbia (NUNS), the Business Association of the Association of Local and Independent Media “Local Press” and the Slavko Curuvija Foundation.

Journalists and media associations: Investigate who in the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MUP) hid evidence in the “Dragojlo Blagojevic case”

0

Journalists’ and media associations demand that the authorities determine who is responsible for hiding key evidence in the case of “threats to Drvotehnika journalist Dragojlo Blagojevic” and how this happened. Journalists’ and media associations deem worrisome the explanation of the Department for Internal Control of the the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MUP) that it was a technical error, and they expect MUP to conduct an internal control procedure in accordance with the law and determine who is responsible. This would contribute to mutual trust between the associations and MUP and to improvement of the safety of journalists.

On August 26, the Third Basic Prosecutor’s Office in Belgrade made a decision to dismiss the criminal complaint because it was established that, at the time when Blagojevic claims that the call in question took place, no calls were made to the specified landline number. Following the insistence of the Standing Working Group for the Safety of Journalists that there were calls at the critical moment, as well as the impossibility for the injured party to obtain information about incoming calls from Telekom, the prosecution directly requested a list of incoming calls from Telekom. In Telekom’s official response, it was confirmed that Dragojlo Blagojevic received the call on 12 July 2022 at 11.45 pm.

At the meeting of the Standing Working Group for the Safety of Journalists, the Deputy Public Prosecutor of the Republic Branko Stamenkovic presented to the members of the Group the report of the Department of Internal Control of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, which was prepared at the order of the Third Basic Prosecutor’s Office due to the suspicion that key evidence in the case of threats to the journalist was concealed within the police, which is why criminal charges were dismissed.

The report of the Department of Internal Control Sector states that an interview was conducted with a person from MUP who reported to the prosecution that there were no calls made in the critical period. However, no interview was conducted with the person who had access and insight into the Telekom database from which the data was taken. The report states that the critical call was not registered by the competent department of MUP, that the reasons are of a technical nature and that efforts will be made to eliminate them.

The representative of the prosecutor’s office in the Standing Working Group informed the members that another case was formed to clarify the facts regarding the discrepancy between the data from Telecom and the competent department of MUP. The Higher Prosecutor’s Office in Belgrade accepted the complaint of the injured party Blagojevic, and the decision was submitted to the Third Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office in Belgrade, after which the prosecutor’s office will continue its proceedings in order to identify the perpetrator.

On July 11, 2022, the editor of the newspaper Drvotehnika, after the publication of a new issue in which he wrote about the malfeasance by the head of Srbijasume, received a telephone threat stating that he would “die soon”. In the report about threats, Blagojevic pointed out his suspicion that the threats were directed to him by the acting director of Srbijasume, who is closely connected with the top of the Socialist Party of Serbia, and who has addressed similar threats to him before.

Journalists’ and media associations believe that the police investigation is cursory and deem shameful the police explanation that they did not see a phone call that clearly took place. We express our fear that it was not only a technical problem, especially bearing in mind that the report of the Department of Internal Control Sector does not show that a conversation was held with the person who had direct access to the database. Also worrying is the testimony of the person who forwarded the data that “it is not the first time that this kind of mistake has happened”. This is a serious problem and it must be determined urgently what really happened, because such actions of MUP only further endanger the safety of journalists and undermine the prosecutor’s investigation, while the task of MUP is to protect journalists who have received threats, not to obstruct the processing of cases. Journalists’ and media associations demand that everyone accountable in this case be heard, from the technical level, i.e. persons who have access to the Telekom database, to the responsible persons of the Department of Criminal Operational Analytics and other superiors. Journalists’ and media associations believe that it is necessary to review the archive of dismissals that have occurred in a similar manner in order to determine whether there have been similar omissions in the past.

Coalition for Media Freedom (Association of Media, the Association of Online Media (AOM), the Independent Association of Journalists of Vojvodina (NDNV), the Independent Journalists Association of Serbia (NUNS), the Business Association of the Association of Local and Independent Media “Local Press” and the Slavko Curuvija Foundation), Association of Independent Electronic Media (ANEM) and Association of Journalists of Serbia (UNS)

BH Journalists: NiP president Konaković is targeting journalists and media on social networks!

0

SARAJEVO, 10/10/2022 – The Steering Committee of the BH Journalists Association strongly condemns political pressures of the Narod i pravda (NiP) party president Elmedin Konaković on journalists and editors of the portals Klix.ba and Istraga.ba, and demands that Konaković stop publicly “calling out” journalists whose reporting does not corresponds with his personal and political views and convictions.

In the last two days, the president of NiP, Elmedin Konaković, published several comments on social networks in which he calls journalists “people of the regime”, alleges that they “spit fire”, that they lie, they launched a “hunt” for him…, all on the occasion of articles published by Klix.ba and Istraga.ba on amendments to the Election Law of BiH, election results and plans of political parties for post-election coalitions.

The Steering Committee of BH Journalists believes that such targeting of media outlets and journalists by the president of a political party is unacceptable, and represents open political pressure and an attempt to silence critical and analytical media reporting on decisions made by certain political parties. Konaković, as he himself points out, has been “living a public life” for more than 25 years. Someone with such long experience on the public and political scene should know that the task of journalists is to criticize, question and analyze the actions of public figures, especially politicians. This kind of engagement is an integral and very important part of the journalistic profession, and not just the mere transmission of information and politicians’ statements without any critical and analytical bias.

It is Konaković’s right that he doesn’t approve of certain media content about him or his party, or considers them untrue, unjustified… However, in such cases, Konaković and all other politicians should use denials and seek the correction of false allegations in the media, and in the last instance they have at their disposal the Law on protection against defamation, and not (mis)use their position of power to publicly label journalists and the media, declaring them as “regime” and the like.

The Steering Committee of BH Journalists reminds that this is not the first time that the president of the NiP has labeled journalists in this way, which is why we had to react publicly on several occasions.

In the last three years, political pressures on journalists in Bosnia and Herzegovina via social networks have become more frequent, open and aggressive. We call on all politicians not to use this kind of communication with the media, because in that way they only further encourage hate speech in the comments of their sympathizers on social networks.

IFJ backs global mobilisation on October 8 to free Julian Assange

0

On October 8th, at 1PM a human chain will surround the Houses of Parliament in London, UK, to oppose the extradition of Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, and urge the US government to drop all charges against him. The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) calls on journalists unions, press freedom organisations and journalists to mobilise and express their solidarity.

More than 3.600 people will form a human chain to demand Assange’s freedom. Members of the IFJ affiliated union in the UK, the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), will join the rally. “Criminalising investigative journalism enables every other kind of repression. If enough of us come together to surround Parliament in a few weeks, that process can be stopped in its tracks,” reads an NUJ statement published for the occasion.

The protest around the British Parliament, organised by the Don’t Extradite Assange campaign, will create a vast visual symbol of the people’s determination to protect freedom of expression. On the same day, actions of solidarity with the founder of WikiLeaks are planned around the world.

In France, a gathering to oppose Assange’s extradition and defend press freedom will be organised by the Assange Support Committee and the 37 organisations that signed the ‘Paris Appeal for Julian Assange’, including our French affiliates, Syndicat national des journalistes CGT (SNJ-CGT) and Syndicat national des journalistes (SNJ). Journalists, trade unionists and association leaders will meet at the Statue Liberte Ile Aux Cygnes in the 15th arrondissement at 2PM.

In the United States, the Assange Defense Committee will hold a rally at the Department of Justice in Washington DC, calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to drop the charges against Assange at 12PM. Other rallies will be organised across the US.

In Australia, Assange’s home country, several actions are planned, including the formation of a human chain starting at Princes Bridge, Southbank, in Melbourne at 11AM.

In addition, more than twenty actions will take place around the globe to demand Assange’s release, from a human chain surrounding the Parliament in Wellington, New Zealand, to a march that will go from the UK embassy to the US embassy in Mexico DF.

The IFJ is gravely concerned about the impact of Assange’s continued detention on media freedom and the rights of all journalists globally. It has launched a global campaign calling on the US government to drop all charges against him and asking all media unions and press freedom organisations to urge their governments to secure Assange’s release. Irrespective of personal views, his extradition will have a chilling effect, with all journalists and media workers at risk.

IFJ President Dominique Pradalié said: “The decision of the UK Home Secretary to allow the extradition of Julian Assange was vindictive and a real blow to media freedom. All journalists must support Julian Assange, who enabled them to reveal US army war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. October 8 is the time to mobilise and express solidarity to defend Assange’s freedom as well as everyone’s right to know”.

If you wish to support the call to free Assange:

  • Download this visual to express solidarity on social media.
  • Use the hashtags #FreeAssangeNOW #humanchain #dropthecharges and tag the accounts @DEAcampaign and @WikiLeaks for more visibility.

Source: IFJ

BAJ statement: Verdicts in the “BelaPAN case” are revenge for professional activity and position

0
photo: pixabay
The Minsk Regional Court sentenced journalists of the oldest independent news agency BelaPAN to long terms of imprisonment.

 

Andrei Aliaksandrau, former deputy director of the news agency, was sentenced to 14 years in prison (found guilty of organizing protests, tax evasion, creating “an extremist formation BelaPAN,” and high treason).

His wife Iryna Zlobina was sentenced to 9 years in jail (on charges of organizing protests and high treason).

Former BelaPAN director Dzitry Navazhylau received a sentence of six years in jail (for tax evasion and the creation of “an extremist formation BelaPAN”).

Editor-in-chief Iryna Leushyna was sentenced to four years of imprisonment (she was found guilty of creating an “extremist formation BelaPAN”).

The Belarusian Association of Journalists has considered the criminal case against BelaPAN as politically motivated since the first day of its staff prosecution. BelaPAN representatives performed their professional duties legally and remained a model of high-profile Belarusian journalism before the arrest. We are convinced that it is the persecution of BelaPAN journalists that caused the death of the founder and head of the news agency Ales Lipai in 2018.

The initiation of criminal proceedings and the enormous sentences in the “BelaPAN case” are nothing but revenge against media representatives for their honest work and position.

The Belarusian Association of Journalists strongly condemns the reprisals against our colleagues and demands the immediate release of the thirty media representatives currently behind bars.

Source: Belarusian Association of Journalists

World Day for Decent Work: Time for wage justice in journalism

0
photo: canva

To mark World Day for Decent Work (WDDW) on 7 October the International Federation of journalists (IFJ), the world’s largest organisation of journalists, is joining the International Trade Union Confederation’s call for wage justice. The IFJ demands media organisations restore decent wages in journalism and stop anti-union practices.

Across the world the federation has witnessed a deteriorating situation for journalists and media workers with the weakening of labour laws, a growing insecurity in the workplace, more precarious working conditions and the undermining of rights to bargain collectively as a result of many media organisations’ anti-Union strategies.

The covid pandemic badly hit the media industry with many publications, programmes and online media closing down, leaving thousands of journalists unemployed.

Today’s world of skyrocketing inflation rates has severely impacted journalists’ incomes, forcing many to strike in protest at the failure of media employers to increase salaries.

In some part of the world journalists even struggle to receive their monthly pay, some of them having to rely on “brown envelopes” to make a living, thus jeopardizing media independence.

In many regions unions’ activities have been forcibly limited, most dramatically illustrated by the state liquidation of journalists unions such as in Belarus or Russia, or union leaders’ arrests as recently in Hong Kong.

Despite the threats and challenges, many unions have responded by growing membership, winning negotiating rights and securing improved pay and rights.

IFJ President Dominique Pradalie said: “We need fair labour laws and wage justice, respect for workers’ fundamental rights, the end of discrimination among media workers and decent working conditions for all. World Day for Decent Work is an opportunity for unions to remind governments of their obligations towards workers and the International Labor Organisation’s conventions they are bound by, including equal pay and the right to organise collectively. There can be no free and independent media where journalists live in poverty and without security and rights“. 

Source: IFJ

Process for the attack on journalist: Two different bodies decides at the same time

0
pixabay.com

BIJELO POLJE, 07.10.2022. – The fact that the main hearing at the Bijelo Polje Misdemeanour Court in the case of the attack on the journalist of daily Vijesti, Jadranka Cetkovic, was held at the moment when the High Prosecutor’s Office is still deciding on the appeal of the injured party, is a legal absurdity that deprived the journalist of an adequate criminal and legal protection in accordance with the Criminal Code of Montenegro and the Criminal Procedure Code.

The Trade Union of Media of Montenegro warns about the inadequate behavior of judicial authorities in this case, which not only has negative consequences for a specific case, but also creates an unprecedented legal situation in which the same case is being simultaneously decided on by two judicial bodies, whose decisions mutually exclude each other.

Such a behavior is sending a sad message to the public about the position and rights of employees in the media, but also of all citizens who happen to be an injured party in criminal proceedings.

Namely, following the attack on Cetkovic that took place in front of the Bijelo Polje High Court in June 2022 while she was trying to do her job, the Basic State Prosecutor determined that no criminal offence was committed. After the journalist’s attorney Mirko Boskovic appealed the decision, the High State Prosecutor’s Office quashed it, remanded it, and ordered the Basic Prosecutor’s Office to take a series of evidentiary actions, remove the omissions and deficiencies that prevented it from making a righteous decision in the specific case.

In the meantime, the Bijelo Polje Basic State Prosecutor requested the Misdemeanour Court to initiate misdemeanour proceedings (in order to comply with the deadline from Article 153 of the Misdemeanour Law) due to the same event and against the same suspect, thus starting a series of illogical and completely irrational actions, which in the end resulted in a flagrant violation of the fundamental principles of criminal and misdemeanour proceedings by both the Basic State Prosecutor’s Office and the Misdemeanour Court in Bijelo Polje, all to the detriment of Jadranka Cetkovic.

Namely, after the appeal of the injured party’s attorney was accepted, without undertaking all the necessary evidentiary actions, Basic State Prosecutor’s Office again dismissed the criminal complaint, instructing the attorney and the injured party with appealing with the High State Prosecutor’s Office or with undertaking criminal prosecution within 30 days. Considering numerous omissions and the incorrect interpretation of the norms, Boskovic submitted an appeal to the Bijelo Polje High Prosecutor’s Office in order for the latest decision on the dismissal of the criminal complaint to be reviewed. To our knowledge, the case is still in the High State Prosecutor’s Office in Bijelo Polje.

At the same time, the Misdemeanour Court has scheduled main hearing against the defendant Elvis Palavrtic for committing an alleged misdemeanour for October 6, 2022. After the Bijelo Polje Basic Prosecutor’s Office requested the hearing to be postponed due to the fact that the proceedings with the relevant Prosecutor’s Office have not yet been completed, meaning that it is still being investigated if in suspect’s behaviour there are elements of the criminal offence of coercion, Bijelo Polje Misdemeanour Court rejected a proposal, swiftly conducted the evidentiary procedure and concluded the hearing, thus creating conditions for decision-making. To make things worse, the injured party herself tried to explain to the acting judge why there were no conditions for misdemeanour proceedings, requesting a postponement so that her attorney, who was not summoned, could attend the hearing. The court, though, rejected this proposal, started the evidentiary proceedings and concluded it on the same day, without even hearing the injured party, given that the defendant fully admitted to the offences he was charged with.

In this way, we have an absurd legal situation, in which the Misdemeanour Court has ended the proceedings against the person for actions that are still being investigated by the competent Prosecutor’s Office in order to determine if they include elements of criminal offence.  In this way, the journalist’s rights to appeal the decision and file a criminal complaint  guaranteed by the Criminal Procedure Code were made completely meaningless, which is no less dangerous form of endangering the position of journalists and media workers than the act of the attack itself.

In addition, we believe that, by such a behaviour, the Basic Prosecutor and judges of the Misdemeanour Court in Bijelo Polje violated some of the basic professional standards, as well as the material and procedural norms of criminal and misdemeanour legislation. The fact that Misdemeanour Court continued the proceedings despite the fact that it was informed about everything by the Basic Prosecutor’s Office before the start of the main hearing is particularly worrying. For this reason, the Trade Union of Media of Montenegro, as a professional organisation of media employees, will take appropriate steps and initiate proceedings with the Prosecutorial and Judicial Councils.

We believe that such a behaviour of the Basic State Prosecutor’s Office and the Misdemeanour Court in Bijelo Polje renders meaningless the stricter penalties for attacks on journalists and media workers prescribed by recently adopted amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code which were aimed at deterring future perpetrators from attacks and reducing their number.

UN: IFJ leads call for action to fight impunity

0

The campaign for a new binding international instrument dedicated to the safety of journalists has been formally launched at the 51st session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. The call for a new UN Convention to enhance the safety, protection and independence of media workers has been backed by journalists and media unions, associations, media representative bodies and NGOs across the world.

Now a working group – the Friends of the Convention – has been set up to enable member states to work towards its adoption.

The group was launched at a side event in Geneva on 30 September addressed by the IFJ President Dominique Pradalié, Nasser Abu Bakker, President of the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate, Zuliana Lainez Otero, vice-President of the journalists’ federation of Latin America and the Caribbean and international human rights expert Dr Carmen Draghici, the author of the draft Convention.

Representatives of members states, including Greece, Italy, Palestine, Austria, Yemen, France, the EU, Latvia, Lebanon, The Netherlands among others, attended the launch of the Convention, as well as international media and journalists’ associations. Messages of support have been received from a number of member states.

The International Convention on the Safety and Independence of Journalists and Other Media Professionals was developed in response to the failure of existing international responses to tackle impunity and growing threats to journalists and media around the world.

It highlights existing weaknesses and loopholes in international humanitarian and human rights law and the lack of effective enforcement mechanisms.

It builds on a recognition of the specific role and threats faced by journalists and the limitations of existing generally applicable rules. A new binding international instrument dedicated to the safety of journalists, including a specific enforcement mechanism would help improve the effectiveness of the international response.

IFJ President Dominique Pradalié said: “Hundreds of journalists have been killed in the past decade, thousands have been jailed. Every day journalists are threatened and attacked. Such crimes are carried out with near total impunity around the world. All those who believe in media freedom, in citizens’ rights to information must act now to stop impunity. On behalf of journalists’ unions and associations and media professionals and their organisations across the world we call on member states to join with us in support of a Convention that can give the international community the tools necessary to enhance the safety of journalists”.

Click here to download the draft Convention.

Source: IFJ