Home Blog Page 78

3 Media Fundraising Campaigns in the Western Balkans to Inspire and Learn From

0
photo: canva
For media outlets, online fundraising is something they rarely consider. Their scepticism is not unfounded, though.

Editors note: We are republishing an article by Sanja Lazić that looks into fundraising in the Western Balkans. This piece was originally published on Journalift.

In the last couple of years, crowdfunding (or online fundraising in general) has become a common topic among, primarily, non-profit organisations in the Western Balkans. It is often (wrongly) perceived as a silver bullet for the financial problems that an organisation faces or an alternative funding option for smaller-scale projects. Considering media outlets in the region, online fundraising and crowdfunding have only recently seen some progress and application within this context.

The reason for this is the general perception that non-profit organisations are more agile and flexible in their communication and approach to the community, their projects seem to find audiences and potential donors with less effort and goals they are (in most cases) trying to reach are more tangible, specific, therefore, the impact they can create is more obvious.

For media outlets, online fundraising is something they rarely consider. Their scepticism is not unfounded, though.

There is no culture of continuous support in any of the Western Balkan countries. Among that philanthropic minority, the donations are mostly reserved for four main areas – healthcare, support to marginalised groups, poverty relief and education.

Additionally, aside from the very few media outlets that are (moderately) successful in raising funds from their audiences, there are not a lot of examples of good practice, particularly among local media.

However, in the current political circumstances that almost all countries in the Western Balkan region share, as well as the available funding options for media, community fundraising is not only the future, but it must become an integral part of the media business strategies as soon as possible.

 

Why should media outlets turn to their audience for support?

Usually, most Western Balkans media outlets turn to the combination of the following funding sources – advertising, public sector funds, international donors, and optionally by providing commercial services such as renting space, equipment, offering their services to others etc. However, most of these sources are unreliable and inconsistent.

Digital platforms such as Google and Facebook have taken precedence over traditional media advertising, leaving media outlets with less advertisers than ever, it is fair to say that this trend will only continue. Public sector funding is generally very limited and when there is access to it, it is often used for political control. International donors represent relief to many media outlets when granted, but this support also comes with several limitations – they can leave the region or shift their focus, content production is rarely supported. Additionally, international donors are mostly looking to support larger projects which local media tend to avoid due to their lack of resources to plan and implement them.

 

If this is the case, what are the media outlets left with?

The unlikely (but also the most logical) answer is the community – the people you have created your media for in the first place. They are not the only solution for media sustainability, but they must be its part.

In this article, we will analyse three online fundraising campaigns launched by media outlets in Serbia and Croatia, taking a deeper look at their strategy, promotion, outcomes and lessons learned that media outlets can apply in their future campaigns.

 

1. TV Forum, Serbia

Before becoming a television, TV Forum was a non-profit organisation consisting of women activists, with the goal to make Prijepolje and their local community, a more solidary and progressive environment. Several years later, they became the first informative television in Prijepolje, the first civil society television in Serbia and the first television founded by women in the Balkans. Their reputation is impeccable and their journalism on a very high level. For 11 years, they have been informing their local community daily about the most important events at the local, impartially, objectively and transparently.

When in September 2019, TV Forum decided to launch its crowdfunding campaign, it became the first crowdfunding campaign of that kind in Serbia. In less than two months, they were supported by 81 donors and had raised more than 4,600 euros for equipping their television studio.

Even though most instructions on campaign preparation will tell you that email marketing is the best place for reaching your potential donors, the truth is – the best place is the one where your community is.

In the case of TV Forum, located and founded in one of the poorest and underdeveloped regions in Serbia, it was clear that communication with donors would have to go through an old-fashioned way. The first thing their core newsroom team did is map their community, segment it based on the type of donor and support they could provide (aside from donating money, people could offer promotional support, in-kind one, volunteer, and so on) and then start contacting all of them. They had campaign ambassadors – influential people in their community who promoted the campaign on social media, which brought additional attention to the campaign to the people who might not have had the chance to hear about TV Forum beforehand.

Phone calls, letters, numerous coffees, text messages, and word of mouth were only part of the strategy to inform their community and potential donors about the campaign. Another major part of the puzzle was reaching out to locals now living in diaspora as their purchasing power is bigger (to find out about the unexploited potentials of Albanian diaspora, read this article).

With those two strategy devices, their campaign far exceeded the initial goal and ended successfully; however, this is not where the work ended. The campaign’s popularity drove more attention to their work. More than financial support, the transparency during the process helped build trust with donors which was crucial for further engagement. The huge opportunity and visibility that the campaign gave the media should not be taken for granted. In fact, this is its main goal – now that all the eyes are on the work the media does, the team gained a unique opportunity to grab the community’s attention and use it to its advantage. The following examples will show us how this is done.

 

2. KRIK, Serbia

KRIK is a popular investigative media outlet from Serbia whose stories focus mostly on crime and corruption. Their work involves great risks, and they are often targets of the tabloid, and pro-government media in Serbia. In the case of KRIK, the higher the risk and attacks they face from politicians, the bigger the attention and donations they receive – and KRIK has wisely used this to their advantage. Now, seven years since they first offered their readers to opt-in and donate, 25% of KRIK’s yearly income comes from their readers.

The bombastic nature of their stories, naturally, drives a lot of attention, but it is one thing getting attention and another converting it to financial support. Thus, KRIK decided to embrace a fundraising model that consists of free access to their stories and articles. For readers who choose to support their work, they offer gifts (merchandise), and exclusive content such as sending their stories to supporters one day before its publishing and providing access to documents they used in their research. For their biggest donors, KRIK’s team invites them to their yearly events where they can meet journalists and learn more about their investigative process. This combination of the donation-membership model has brought them closer to their community and helped make KRIK a brand that equals integrity and credibility.

However, this type of success and impact means two main things – keeping your content as relevant as possible with exceptional quality, along with continuous promotion and direct engagement with your community.

Firstly, if the quality of your stories is not high enough, any promotional and fundraising tactics will be of no help. This is the part where you might say – yes, but KRIK produces risky, attractive stories that are easier to raise money for. And you would be right – only to an extent.

There is no doubt that you will get attention if you write about top-level politicians who are in business deals with criminals. But local media has value that KRIK cannot provide – they offer daily, relevant information that makes life in a small community easier, focusing on their community’s needs. A small media is inversely more approachable and can easily, almost without risk, talk with and interview their community. This direct interaction and “listening to the little man” are significantly more relatable to your audience, and is one of the main pillars of fundraising campaigns. Small media can also hold local politicians accountable for their actions. They question decisions of those in power, albeit locally and, if done right, they do it as effectively and objectively as possible, without compromises. Audiences know good work then they see one and if your fundraising strategies haven’t worked so far, maybe it is time to rethink the content you offer. Or think about your fundraising strategy.

 

3. Lupiga, Croatia

In 2017, an online portal Lupiga from Croatia launched a crowdfunding campaign after its Ministry of Culture abolished the program of co-financing non-profit media the year before. With the idea of raising 19,999$, which was half of the minimum amount of money needed for one year of operation of the portal, the campaign attracted great attention and, in the end, raised 128% of its goal. This campaign became a good example for several reasons – one, their promotional strategy and creativity and two, the proof of the importance of community.

Before the campaign, Lupiga was already a well-known online media that gathered left-wing, opinionated, educated audiences who shared similar values and interests. As Lupiga decided to launch a promotional video for their campaign, they already knew their power lay in those who represent symbols of those same values – famous musicians, writers, authors and activists who gathered to give support to the main message of the campaign – “freedom costs”. The video featured the team behind Lupiga – giving it credibility, authenticity and realness. With the combination of unforced humour and a clear message, the video achieved exactly what it was supposed to – it got the attention of the viewer, created empathy, optimism instead of shudder and called to action – gave clear instructions on how one can support.

Finally, Lupiga’s campaign showed the true value and power of a community, one that should never be forgotten and only be reminded of when help is urgent.

Instead of using crowdfunding as a survival tool, it should be an integral part of the media’s business plan from the beginning.

 

Conclusions

The power of people and your community should not be underestimated. Despite living in times of individuality, selfishness and uncertainty, people will always need their media to educate, inform them and give them value.

Community fundraising offers that – your readers freedom and an option to show support to those that matter to them, motivate the competition to become better, learn from their mistakes and advance, while keeping the media on their toes.

Community fundraising keeps things in perspective – it reminds the media who they founded it for in the first place. It gives (back) control and allows you, as a media, better revenue diversification. As with everything, those who first start riding a new wave will be the ones who will start reaping benefits before others.

Source: The Fix Media

EFJ report: Journalists not sufficiently trained in health and safety issues

0

A report published by the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) about the safety of journalists across Europe reveals a serious lack of training and awareness, as journalists face increasing threats and intimidation in the course of their work. Authored by media expert Marc Gruber, the report analyses the current situation of the health and safety of journalists across Europe and explores the responsibilities of management, journalists’ unions and associations in tackling the issue.

The safety of journalists is a priority for many journalists’ unions in Europe, who have witnessed the increasing physical and psychological risks faced by media workers in recent years. In 2021, the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) documented a total of 626 media freedom violations against journalists and media outlets across the EU, candidate countries, and the United Kingdom.

Carried out in Spring 2022, the survey found that:

  • 40% of respondents stated they faced at least one form of threat or incident against them in the past six months;
  • Around half of the attacks were experienced either by themselves or their colleagues;
  • “Softer” threats, such as hate speech, verbal abuse and insults, are the most reported incidents but are often overlooked. Women are more frequently the targets of hate speech than their male counterparts; Nearly three-quarters of the women interviewed were affected by hate speech in the past six months.
  • Hacking is an issue for over one-third of journalists and defamation is the most common legal threat reported.

According to the report, the extent of psychological incidents and their impact on the work and morale of journalists is underestimated. Many journalists said they are left to deal with their own problems and suffer from isolation. “It took eight months after an attack for my editor to simply ask me ‘how are you’ “, said one journalist.

In addition to these alarming results, the survey also shows a lack of safety training:

  • Over one third of the journalists do not know if their workplace or employer has developed any policy on safety and security;
  • Only 40% of the respondents declared that risks are assessed prior to dangerous assignments and missions;
  • Only a minority of journalists surveyed received training in each category identified for this study (hostile environment first aid, general first aid, digital security, and health and safety at work);
  • Freelance journalists in particular have to self-fund to attend training sessions which, in most cases, are outdated.
  • The survey respondents stated they would like to see implemented by their employers’ preventive measures of safety, including relevant and updated safety training sessions, safety policies and reporting procedures in case of incidents.

However, the attitude is different depending on where the journalist is based. In Eastern Europe, for example, journalists do not trust their employers nor the public authorities when reporting safety incidents. Several journalists considered that there should be an independent body or person who can be directly contacted to report incidents.

Journalists’ unions and associations are mostly expected to provide expertise, counselling and legal support. However, legal support requires specific skills and financial resources that most organisations cannot afford.

A key recommendation which emerged from this survey was to implement internal regulations supporting journalists’ safety, such as administering physical training on safety or initiating dialogue with journalists and editors or media managers. Another recommendation was to set up collective agreements and that this should be the role of the unions/associations as well as national or regional politicians who could raise the issue at the political level.

This survey was carried out in the framework of the “Safety4journalists” project. The results are based on 290 individual responses to a series of 55 questions available in four European languages (English, French, German and Croatian). The results are being used by the EFJ to better understand the health and safety needs of journalists and their perception of threats. The findings will also be disseminated to stakeholders who play a role in developing better policies, risk assessment tools and training for journalists. It will also eventually contribute to safety training courses run by the EFJ and its partner organisations.

(Source: EFJ)

Coalition for Media Freedom: “Informer” Violated the Serbian Journalists’ Code of Ethics

0

The Coalition for Media Freedom strongly condemns the decision of the “Informer” daily to publish an interview with the convicted serial rapist Igor Milosevic, recently released from prison. The problem is the way in which the interview was conducted where Milosevic describes how he committed various criminal acts and how he felt at the time.

The Coalition is of the opinion that “Informer” breached the Serbian Journalists’ Code of Ethics with the interview because giving media space to a rapist in this way is inadmissible and there is no public interest that can be justified by this approach. The coalition stresses the importance of  the Code of Ethics which states that business, political and private interests of publishers and owners must not be an excuse or justification for breaching the Code. TheCode of Ethics obliges the media to be objective and to take into account the credibility of sources and  far-reaching consequences of spoken and written words. The Journalists’ Code of Ethics, social responsibility and basic empathy require from us to stand in solidarity with the victims and to protect and respect their rights and dignity.

A journalist must never abuse the emotions of others, their ignorance or lack of judgment, which is the case here. Even more so considering that the source of information in this case was apparently not aware of the power of the media and the consequences that his statements could have on the people he talked about, as well as on himself. Conscious abuse of the source is incompatible with journalistic professionalism, and so is carelessness, the possible consequence of which could be the abuse of source.

The Coalition also believes that the interview retraumatized women, primarily those who survived the source’s violence, but also all women who experienced anyform of sexual violence.

The Coalition also points out that Milosevic was released without an adequate resocialization program, which triggered fear among citizens who publish pictures of his whereabouts that certain media republishwhich is in violation of the Personal Data Protection Law.

The coalition calls on the Ministry of Culture and Information, responsible for the implementation of the Law on Public Information and Media, to use its powers in view of  the disputed interview violating Article 79, paragraph 3 of the Law.

On this occasion, we invite all the media to respect the Serbian Journalists’ Code of Ethics, as well as the right to privacy, in this and all other situations.

The Coalition for Media Freedom consists of the Association of Media, the Association of Online Media (AOM), the Independent Association of Journalists of Vojvodina (NDNV), the Independent Journalists Association of Serbia (NUNS), the Business Association of the Association of Local and Independent Media “Local Press” and the Slavko Curuvija Foundation.

How to use open source intelligence data to debunk Russian disinformation

0
photo: canva

Aself-described “college nerd” sat on a porch in Birmingham, Alabama, explaining via Zoom how he runs one of the most-followed Twitter feeds on the war in Ukraine. Around 275,000 regularly check his account, The Intel Crab.

Justin Peden, 20, is an example of how data is being used to debunk disinformation in today’s  high tech ecosystem. He uses geolocation, satellite imagery, TikTok, Instagram and other sleuthing tools to monitor the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II.

Scouring the internet for streaming webcams, smartphone videos and still photos to pinpoint Russian troop locations, air bombardments and the destruction of once peaceful neighborhoods are a routine part of his day. If a Russian commander denies bombing an area, Peden and other war watchers quickly post evidence exposing the falsehood.

“I never dreamed in a million years that what I was doing could end up being so relevant. I just wanted to expose people to what was going on [in Ukraine]. I really am just a regular college kid,” said the University of Alabama at Birmingham junior.

 

photo: IJNET

 

Open source intelligence (OSINT) has become a potent force for online detectives like Peden. They use data to break through the fog of war, operating on computers thousands of miles away. Their impact has not gone unnoticed.

“The intelligence gathering, fact-checking, and debunking is happening in real time. The online crowd is also documenting the movement and placement of Russian troops, creating something more than a snapshot of recent history. It is often actionable intelligence,” said veteran science journalist Miles O’Brien during a PBS program in April.

 

On the air that day, O’Brien singled out Peden as “a highly regarded practitioner in the fast-growing field of open-source intelligence, or OSINT,” and noted that his postings on Ukraine are followed “outside and inside the intelligence community.” The Washington Post included him in a story on the “rise of Twitter spies.”

There is the saying, “The first casualty of war is truth.” Today, however, there is a shift in the equation. With the click of a mouse, anybody can transmit false information, no matter how dangerous, malicious or intimidating. The invasion of Ukraine is a textbook example of how digital untruths fueled a humanitarian crisis, leading to death and massive destruction.

It is important to note that disinformation differs from misinformation in that it not only is false, but it is part of a “purposeful effort to mislead, deceive, or confuse.” In short, it is content intended to harm.

Germany’s Deutsche Welle (DW) is an example of how a verification system can expose actors with a malicious intent to inflict damage. In the run-up to the war, DW’s fact-checking team began compiling a file of false claims and propaganda from both sides in the conflict and publishing corrections. They also made a startling discovery: false information was being put out under their name.

“Pro-Russian fabricated posts pretending to be those of the BBC, CNN and DW are fueling the mis- and disinformation war between Russia and Ukraine,” DW reported in July. The story cited an example from a Japanese Twitter network.  Here is an excerpt:

 

“‘It looks like a DW report,’ a Twitter user comments in Japanese on an alleged DW video about a Ukrainian refugee who is claimed to have raped women in Germany — serious accusations against a man named ‘Petro Savchenko.’ The Twitter user writes: ‘Please share with me the URL of the original video.’ The user seems to doubt the origin of the video — and rightly so. It is not a DW production. It is a fake.”

 

In another instance, when a Twitter user posted a video allegedly showing fierce air-to-ground combat between Russia and Ukraine, DW fact checkers traced it to a 2013 computer game.

 

 

 

photo: IJNET

 

DW asked scholars and practitioners for suggestions on how to make fact-checking more effective. The advice is relevant to journalists anywhere in the world: Among the tips:

  • Emphasize correct information rather than amplifying claims
  • Provide unambiguous assessments (and avoid confusing labels like ‘mostly false’).
  • Avoid drawing false equivalencies between opposing viewpoints.
  • Situate fact checks within broader issues — don’t just focus on isolated claims.
  • Analyze and explain the strategies behind misinformation — connect fact checks with media and information literacy.

[Read more: Why collaboration is vital in the fight against disinformation]

 

Gaining a better understanding of how propaganda techniques work can help disarm spin masters. A Rand corporation report “The Russian ‘Firehose of Falsehood’” is a good place to start.

The title refers to a strategy “where a propagandist overwhelms the public by producing a never-ending stream of misinformation and falsehoods.” Even flagrant lies delivered rapidly and continuously, over multiple channels such as news broadcasts and social media, can be effective in molding public opinion, according to the report.

Published in 2016 at the height of the U.S. presidential election, this analysis provides a road map for how Russia’s disinformation system operates.

“The report is very much on target for what is going on today. Bucket after bucket of nasty propaganda is being dumped on us,” said social scientist Christopher Paul, a principal investigator for defense and security-related research projects, and the report’s co-author. His research includes counterterrorism, counterinsurgency and cyber warfare.

 

According to the Rand report, Russian disinformation tends to be:

  • High volume and multi-channel
  • Rapid, continuous and repetitive
  • Lacks commitment to objective reality
  • Lacks commitment to consistency.

 

The study also provided best practices on how to beat falsehoods, such as:

  • Provide warnings at the time of initial exposure to misinformation.
  • Repeat the refutation or retraction.
  • Make corrections that provide an alternative story to help fill the gap in understanding when false information is removed.

“It all goes back to journalistic standards. All journalists really need to turn the screws is to be as professional as possible,” said Paul. “Double-checking, verifying sources, confirming attribution, using data to be accurate and reliable. The burden of truth, the burden of evidence is much higher.”

Source: IJNET

By: Sherry Ricchiadri

 

This article was adapted from a story originally posted on DataJournalism.com. It was edited and republished on IJNet with permission.

Commission for Attacks on Journalists: Resolve old cases urgently

0

PODGORICA, 24.09.2022. – The heads of the competent prosecutor’s offices should conduct an inspection of all cases of attacks on journalists and media property in which the investigation takes a long time or is ineffective and, if necessary, give binding instructions to the acting prosecutors.

This is one of the recommendations of the Commission for monitoring the actions of competent authorities in investigations of cases of threats and violence against journalists, murders of journalists and attacks on media property, reports “Vijesti”.

The government adopted their report for the period from February 10 to June 20, 2022.

“The Commission recommends that the Supreme State Prosecutor and the heads of competent higher State Prosecutor’s Offices consider the possibility of entrusting certain cases in which the investigation takes a long time or is ineffective to other prosecutors in that Prosecutor’s Office or other State Prosecutor’s Offices in accordance with the law,” the Commission states.

They recommend the Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office and the competent Higher Prosecutor’s Offices to carry out immediate supervision over all cases of attacks on journalists and media property and to submit a proposal for determining disciplinary responsibility to the Prosecutor’s Council or to determine whether there were omissions in the actions of prosecutors, in investigations that last a long time or are ineffective – if there is reasonable doubt about this.

“The Commission recommends that the Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office submit to the Commission the latest version of the ‘special balance sheet of achieved results, which contains all the cases formed on the occasion of attacks on journalists and their property and which describes the relevant evidentiary actions carried out by the prosecutor in individual cases’, as well as that the updated table, if it is still kept, is also submitted to the Commission”, the last recommendation states.

During the Government session, it was also said that the Commission addressed “the foreign political partners of the USA and Great Britain, including the FBI, in order to do their job better”.

The Commission’s tasks are to determine the plan and dynamics of gathering facts and determining other circumstances related to investigations into cases of threats and violence against journalists, murders of journalists and attacks on media property, and to this end cooperate with the authorities responsible for conducting these investigations.

“On the basis of the information received and the observed circumstances in connection with the conducted investigations, prepare an overview of the current course of the conducted investigations, prepare an opinion on the effective way in which the conduct of the investigation could be improved and, for this purpose, propose concrete measures that should be taken,” it states in Article 3 of the Decision on the Formation of the Commission for Monitoring the Actions of Competent Authorities in Investigations of Cases of Threats and Violence Against Journalists, Murders of Journalists, and Attacks on Media Property.

Russia: 18 journalists arrested during anti-war protests

0

Over 1,300 people, including 18 journalists, were detained across Russia on Wednesday as rallies against a military mobilization declared by President Vladimir Putin for the war in Ukraine took place in 42 cities across the country. The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) demands the release of these citizens who were demonstrating peacefully as well as the journalists who were covering the demonstrations.

According to the independent OVD-Info police monitor, at least 1,328 people, including 18 journalists identified by the independent Journalists and Media Workers Union (JMWU), have been detained nationwide so far. A majority of those detained were women.

Most of the detained journalists wore Press waistcoats and carried professional press cards. Some of them were quickly released, others were given tickets, which put them at risk of fines and short prison terms. According to OVD-Info, one journalist, Denis Lipa, was beaten in Moscow by police when he showed his press card.

Journalist Artem Krieger, who was broadcasting live for SOTA-Vision, was arrested, charged with obstructing traffic and issued with a summons to the military registration office.

“This is not the first time we have witnessed the police treating journalists covering protests as protesters themselves,” said JMWU office secretary Andrei Jvirblis. “Sometimes this can be explained by the ignorance of police officers, but this time the desire to suppress any information about the protests against the authorities’ policy is obvious. A society deprived of information channels resembles an organism whose pain reflexes are atrophied. Such a situation is fatally dangerous.”

“These targeted arrests of journalists by the police are a massive censorship operation,” said EFJ President Maja Sever. “The Russian authorities are clearly doing everything to hide the wave of protests in Russia. We salute the work of Russian journalists who are taking personal risks to inform the public about the wave of opposition to the war in Ukraine.”

Source: EFJ

Albania: Media must not face criminal prosecution for public interest reporting

0
photo: canva

Media freedom groups raise concern over heavy-handed response

The undersigned media freedom and journalist associations today express our shared concern over the blanket publication ban issued by Albanian prosecutorial authorities regarding a trove of hacked data, and stress that no journalist or media outlet should face criminal sanctions for publishing information in the public interest.

While our organisations recognise the sensitive nature of these leaks and urge all media in Albania to handle the material in a strictly ethical and responsible manner, it is vital that Albanian authorities proceed with caution and full consideration for journalistic freedoms protected under both domestic and international law.

On 19 September 2022, the Prosecutor’s Office of Tirana issued an “order” which banned all media in Albania from publishing data or information from a cache of files which had been hacked from Albanian servers and computer systems and then leaked online. The high-profile leaks followed a wave of damaging cyber-attacks on Albanian servers and computer systems in recent months by state-backed hackers in Iran, which has caused a diplomatic crisis and the severing of ties between the two countries.

The bulk of the hacked material contains classified police information and sensitive email correspondence, documents and memos between Albanian politicians, authorities and foreign ambassadors, including documents about suspected plans to assassinate foreign and domestic political figures, according to reports.

In response to the latest leaks, the Prosecutor’s Office of Tirana issued the order and warned that media that violate the ban would face criminal investigation under articles 103, 208 and 304 of the penal code. This included publication in audio-visual, print and online media, as well as social media. News websites that published data would subsequently be blocked.The information was first shared via a post on the Facebook account of the Albanian Police.

Our organisations recognise the severity of these cyber-attacks and the sensitive nature of the leaked data. In such circumstances, the media have a professional responsibility to handle and present this kind of material in an ethical manner, with full consideration given to citizens’ right to privacy and serious national security concerns.

However, regardless of the source of the material or the intent of those behind the attacks, journalists have a responsibility to assess the veracity and public interest nature of the leaked information, as well as the right of citizens to be informed about newsworthy matters.

The response by the Tirana Prosecutor’s Office to try and unilaterally limit all reporting on the leaked information, without proper consideration given to the public interest, therefore raises serious concerns about unjustified infringements on the freedom of the press, which is already under the spotlight in Albania.

Threats of criminal investigations and website blocking for media or journalists that violate the banning order will meanwhile have a censorious effect on reporting and could open the door to the criminalisation of legitimate journalistic activity. No journalist, editor or publisher in Albania should face prosecution for publishing accurate information on a matter of public interest.

Moreover, the role of the Audiovisual Media Authority (AMA) and the Electronic and Postal Communications Authority (AKEP) – two independent bodies – in monitoring the media ecosystem for potential violations on behalf of the Prosecutor’s Office also raises clear concerns.

Moving forward, our organisations urge investigatory and government authorities in Albania to avoid taking any further steps which undermine the exercise of responsible journalism or endanger the liberty of journalists publishing public interest material. We will continue to closely monitor the situation in the coming days and respond to further developments.

Signed:

ARTICLE 19 Europe

European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)

European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)

Free Press Unlimited (FPU)

International Press Institute (IPI)

SafeJournalists Network

Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)

Belarusian RFE/RL Journalist Released From Penal Colony, Arrives In Lithuania

0
photo: pixabay

MINSK — RFE/RL correspondent Aleh Hruzdzilovich, who was sentenced to 18 months in prison by Belarusian authorities for allegedly participating in demonstrations that he was covering as an accredited journalist, has been released.

Hruzdzilovich arrived in Lithuania on September 21 accompanied by his wife, Maryana, after he was released from a penal colony in the region of Mahilyou where he had been held since May.

RFE/RL President Jamie Fly, who previously condemned Hruzdzilovich’s prison sentence as “illegitimate,” hailed the release of the journalist, who had served as RFE/RL’s correspondent focused on human rights since the 1990s.

“Aleh was robbed of time he will never get back with his family while wrongly imprisoned, and I am overjoyed that he will now be reunited with his wife and other loved ones” Fly said. “I am grateful to members of the international and advocacy communities for their unwavering support of Aleh’s case, but our work is not done.”

Fly noted that two other Belarusians who have been imprisoned since the crackdown, RFE/RL consultant and blogger Ihar Losik and RFE/RL freelance correspondent Andrey Kuznechyk, remain behind bars and “should also be released immediately.”

A court in Minsk sentenced Hruzdzilovich in early March for his presence at mass protests challenging the official results of the 2020 presidential election in Belarus that handed authoritarian ruler Alyaksandr Lukashenka a sixth term in office.

Hruzdzilovich was also ordered to pay 56,000 rubles ($16,600) in compensation to the Mensktrans city transportation agency, which was a plaintiff in the case.

Mensktrans claimed Hruzdzilovich’s participation in three unsanctioned rallies cost it revenue. At one demonstration, Hruzdzilovich said he was working as a correspondent with accreditation issued by the Foreign Ministry, while at the other two protests he was working as a correspondent for the Narodnaya volya (People’s will) newspaper.

Hruzdzilovich was arrested in December amid a harsh crackdown by Belarusian authorities on independent media, rights activists, and democratic institutions in the wake of the protests. The opposition and the West say the vote was rigged and that opposition candidate Svyatlana Tsikhanouskaya won the election.

Thousands of people have been detained by security forces in the crackdown.

Source: Belarusian Association of Journalists

Krackovic unanimously appointed as president

0
photo: SMCG

Journalist and editor Radomir Krackovic is the new president of the Trade Union of Media of Montenegro, delegates of the 4th Assembly unanimously decided.

Krackovic announced that in the next four years, the focus of his work will be on the adoption of the Branch collective agreement for the media sector, full respect for all labor rights in the media, greater safety of journalists and media workers, as well as increasing the number of Union members.

“Although they seem difficult to achieve due to the current media and social situation in our country, I believe that these goals are not unattainable. It is clear that they will need a lot of work, a firm attitude towards employers and decision-makers, but also the ability to impose solutions through conversations and negotiations that will provide a better position for our members and media workers. The media union will, as before, uncompromisingly stand by its members in the fight for a better tomorrow for our profession,” Krackovic said.

The Assembly also elected a new Main Board for the next four-year mandate. The main committee will consist of: Jadranka Drobnjak and Danijel Celecki (RTCG), Boris Pejovic (Vijesti), Predrag Nikolic (Monitor), Edin Zukovic (RTV Pljevlja), Enes Gusinjac (RTV Rožaje), Milena Bubanja Obradovic (Radio Berane), Dragana Vlaovic (RTV Herceg Novi), Suzana Mujic (Radio Ulcinj), Sinisa Sanader (Radio Tivat), Marijana Camovic Veličkovic (individual members) and Radomir Krackovic (TV Vijesti).

In the introductory part, the recent president, Marijana Camovic Velickovic, presented the work of that trade union organization in the previous term, noting that a lot of work has been done, but also that the profession is facing numerous challenges.

“After doubling the membership in 2018 and joining three new trade union organizations, SMCG continued to work on the expansion of SMCG and significant progress was achieved in that segment. Over the past four years, the membership has been increased by three new trade union organizations – the Radio and Television of Cetinje, the Radio Ulcinj and the Radio Tivat, which joined our Trade Union in 2019. In this way, about 30 new members joined the Union,” she said.

Camovic Velickovic emphasized that during the previous four years, 14 researches were carried out, 217 advocacy activities, 16 public events were organized with domestic and international participation, and 245 press releases were sent.

In the introductory part, the deputy general secretary of the Union of Free Trade Unions of Montenegro, Ivana Mihaijlovic, said that the enthusiasm, will, perseverance and courage of those who were at the head of the union made the Media Union an indispensable partner at all levels.

“You have gone through a thorny path since your establishment and we are proud of what you have achieved,” said Mihajlovic.

The President of the European Federation of Journalists, Maja Sever, in a video message, thanked for the cooperation and pointed out that with its previous work, SMCG was a role model not only in the region but also in Europe.

“I hope that we will continue to cooperate, that we will continue to work together on the most important goals of our organizations, but also of the European Federation of Journalists, which is the strengthening and empowerment of male and female journalists,” she concluded.

30 delegates from 12 trade union organizations participated in the work of the Assembly.