Home Blog Page 15

The Council of Europe criticizes “lex AP” and asserts that the working conditions of journalists in Croatia are concerning.

0

The Croatian government has attempted to limit the media’s right to protect their sources and criticize courts and prosecutors, the Council of Europe states in its annual report on media freedom on the continent, adding that the working conditions of journalists in Croatia are concerning. Although the number of killed journalists and violence against them is decreasing, the pan-European organization warned in its report released on Tuesday of threats, pressures, and restrictions on journalists’ work across Europe.

The report, which spans nearly a hundred pages, was prepared in collaboration with the Platform for the Safety of Journalists, which brings together a number of journalistic organizations from Europe.

Croatia is mentioned several times in the report, with the so-called “lex AP” drawing the most attention from the authors. If the new Croatian media law is adopted, it will “force journalists to register”, prohibit them from “criticizing the work of courts and public prosecutors”, compel them to reveal their sources to their editor upon request, introduce the right to compensation for individuals whose names have been published in the media after “illegally” acquiring information, and introduce measures by a media council elected by the parliamentary majority.

“Critics warn that if adopted, this law will crush independent journalism in Croatia and shape a new era of state-controlled media, contrary to European standards,” the report states.

The document cites research from the Media Pluralism Monitor, a project co-funded by the European Union, which states that only four out of 32 analyzed European countries have good working conditions for journalists: Denmark, Germany, Ireland, and Sweden.

“The study’s results show a particularly worrying work situation in Croatia, Hungary, Montenegro, and Romania, where journalists do not have employee status and often lack adequate social protection,” the report says.

The Council also writes about “difficult times” for cartoonists in Europe, citing, among other things, the example of a lawsuit against Croatian cartoonist Nikola Plečko, better known by the pseudonym Nik Titanik, filed by former Dinamo Zagreb executive Krešimir Antolić.

In the 2024 report, the Council lists the major problems for press freedom: threats and intimidation, arrests, restrictive laws, SLAPP and other lawsuits, media takeovers, and attacks on public services. Threats from politicians and criminal organizations to the media are emphasized, sometimes resulting in physical violence.

This year, “new threats” to the profession are also mentioned, such as artificial intelligence, the influence of social media, disinformation, repression of reporting on climate change, and the political atmosphere of radicalization and polarization.

On the positive side, the Council writes that European institutions and a number of countries have shown that they understand the seriousness of the crisis and have accepted the key role of free media as public watchdogs informing citizens and calling centers of power to account.

The fifth module of the Academy for information Integrity was held

0

Journalism students and journalists participating in the second edition of the Academy for information integrity were taught about algorithms and social media on Saturday.

This module, led by Gëzim Bala, a marketing expert and founder of LVL UP company, focused on the significance of social media. It covered how algorithms function across various applications and offered insights on creating more user-friendly content.

Additionally, participants discussed about the methods for protecting themselves on social media and strategies to maximize their profit through its use.

The Academy for Information Integrity will have a final module for this second edition, which will be held in the coming weeks.

IJAS: Public Officers to Stop Discriminating Against Media and Journalists

0

The Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia (IJAS) condemns the behavior of the local authorities in Indjija and Loznica, who prohibit journalists from attending events of interest to the public, as well as the behavior of high officials of the Serbian Progressive Party, Aleksandar Sapic and Ana Brnabic, who refuse to answer journalists’ questions. We remind the government representatives that discrimination against journalists and the media is prohibited by law and that they should provide conditions for their unhindered work.

Today, the journalist of the In medija portal from Indjija, Verica Marincic, was kicked out of the Indjija municipality building because she “wasn’t on the list” to monitor the conference regarding the residents’ protest against the abolition of the railway station in Cortanovci. In the video published by N1 television, you can see a member of the security forces throwing the journalist out of the building using physical force.

Verica Marincic says that she came to see off the protest that was announced earlier, and when she saw that Indija journalists were entering the building, she followed them, but was met at the entrance by the chief of staff of the municipal president, who told her that she could not go to the conference.

“I took my phone to record what he was saying to me and he grabbed my left upper arm because I had a phone in that hand and squeezed me expecting the phone to fall out of my hand. Because I didn’t want to let go, he took my phone. When he saw that it was all being recorded by a journalist from N1, then he withdrew. After that, a man from security came out and started pushing me to go outside,” stated Verica Marincic and added that the whole case was reported to the competent authorities.

The same thing happens to the journalists of the Pakt info portal from Loznica. Namely, since the constitution of the new convocation of the Loznica Municipal Assembly, they have been forbidden to attend sessions even though the work of the Assembly is public, and they have been accredited since 2012 and regularly receive material for monitoring the Assembly.

The journalist of this portal, Miroslav Mijatovic, says that on January 28, they received an invitation to attend the constitution of the new convocation of the assembly, but that they were not allowed to enter.

“We showed up there and the security guards waited for us at the door, they told us that we didn’t have accreditation and that they couldn’t let us in. The very next day, we asked to see the decision by which we were forbidden to enter, that is, the decision of a municipal administration authority that it is necessary to be accredited for the assembly. We referred to the statute that ensures the public in the work of the assembly. However, we did not receive an answer and we are conducting proceedings before the Commissioner”, says Mijatovic and adds that the same thing happened to them on February 29, when the appointment of the mayor was on the agenda.

High-ranking officials of the Serbian Progressive Party, Aleksandar Sapic and Ana Brnabic, do not forbid journalists from following the events they participate in, but they refuse to answer questions from “unfit” journalists. In any case, those who are obliged to answer to the public for their work, refuse to do so.

The practice of banning journalists from attending public events, as well as the refusal of public officials to answer journalists’ questions, must stop immediately. Power holders must provide all journalists with unhindered coverage of events that are of public interest.

In addition, we strongly condemn the use of force against the journalist Verica Marincic and call on the competent authorities to protect her and to react in accordance with their powers.

The media must not be political pamphlets that will only convey political statements. The job of journalists is to ask questions, and it is up to officials to answer, regardless of whether they like the question or not. Representatives of all levels of government should know that journalists ask questions on behalf of the public.

IJAS: City Administration of Novi Pazar to Stop Practice of Unfairly Distributing Funds Intended for Media

0

The Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia (IJAS) appeals to the members of the commission in charge of evaluating project proposals for co-financing media content in Novi Pazar to distribute funds proportionately, in a fair manner, respecting legal rules and enabling media pluralism. Also, we call on the authorities from the City Administration of Novi Pazar not to put pressure on the members of the commission and to enable the conditions provided by law for the work of independent commissions.

Years back, Television Novi Pazar in that city received disproportionately high sums of money through media contests compared to other media participating in the contest. Namely, every year more than 80 percent of the funds earmarked for the media goes to this television.

This practice not only threatens media pluralism and the diversity of voices in the public space, but also calls into question the very purpose of project co-financing, which should be aimed at encouraging quality journalism and a wide range of media content.

The city of Novi Pazar was one of the first this year to announce a competition for co-financing of media content production projects, and it is expected that it will be among the first to decide on the distribution of planned funds for that purpose in the amount of 39 million dinars (almost 333.000 euros). Since the maximum amount that can be received by one project is limited to 32.5 million dinars, it is expected that this year, too, that amount or an approximate amount will be received by Television Novi Pazar.

We call on the authorities in the City Administration in Novi Pazar to stop the practice of uneven and unfair distribution of funds and to put professional reporting and public interest first when distributing funds.

The CJA calls on Prime Minister Plenković to stop attacking journalists

0

The Croatian Journalists’ Association (CJA) calls on Prime Minister Andrej Plenković to refrain from constantly calling out journalists who – in the public interest – report on government affairs led by Plenković himself.

The Prime Minister has repeatedly accused journalists of leaking classified information, accused them of being corrupt, of publishing private correspondence between the appointed Chief State Attorney Ivan Turudić and former State Secretary Josipa Rimac for profit and “clicks”, and claimed that there is actually no public interest in publishing such information.

Similar rhetoric is employed by the Prime Minister when commenting on publications related to investigations by the EPPO, some branches of which have reached the Ministry of Culture and Media. He mentions “privileged journalists”, singles out a “handful of privileged journalists”, and accuses them of spinning.

By accusing journalists of corruption and publishing for the sake of “clicks”, the Prime Minister puts a target on journalists and exposes them to potential attacks. At the same time, unfounded accusations are made, which politicians, especially the highest state officials such as the Prime Minister, should avoid.

Prime Minister Plenković is not and cannot be the chief editor of Croatian media. The role of journalists and the media is to question individuals in positions of power and to point out irregularities in the system because that’s how they uphold democracy and hold those elected to public office accountable to the public.

Although the Prime Minister, through attempts to introduce the “Lex AP” and the appointment of the Chief State Attorney, continues with his autocratic capture of institutions that should oversee the authorities and be independent from them, he cannot prohibit journalists from doing their job in accordance with internationally accepted professional standards and democratic values, which they protect and promote in doing so.

For the Executive Board of the Croatian Journalists’ Association:

Hrvoje Zovko, President of the CJA

Chiara Bilić, Vice President of the CJA

Dragutin Hedl, Vice President of the CJA

The Anti-Slapp Directive was adopted in the European Parliament

0

At today’s plenary vote in the European Parliament, the Anti-SLAPP Directive was adopted, which sets minimum standards for protection against abusive litigation in the form of SLAPPs, or Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation.

The Anti-SLAPP Coalition in Europe (CASE) welcomed the adoption of the Directive and clarifies that the onus now lies with member states to build on the foundations laid by the Anti-SLAPP Directive and draft effective national legislation that includes:

– A broad scope that covers both domestic SLAPP cases and claims governed by criminal procedural law or in administrative proceedings; Strong safeguards in terms of an early release mechanism to filter out SLAPPs; Safeguards in national damages legislation with special criteria, as well as imposing substantial fines on plaintiffs for using SLAPP to intimidate public supervisors; Non-legal instruments such as support mechanisms, judge/lawyer awareness and training, lawyer ethics, data collection and monitoring of SLAPPs – these instruments are detailed in the Commission’s Anti-SLAPP Recommendations.

CASE analyzed the three most important aspects of the final text of the Anti-SLAPP Directive. These are recommendations for transposition into national legislation: Early dismissal mechanism, Definition of transboundary border and Compensatory damages.

CASE will closely monitor transposition to ensure that these minimum standards are met across Europe and that legislation is drafted in line with the Commission’s Anti-SLAPP Recommendation and the Council of Europe Recommendation on SLAPPs. A positive vote in the plenary session is an important next step in the fight against SLAPPs, but more needs to be done at the member state level to introduce protections against SLAPPs.

Threats against Kallxo’s team in Skënderaj

0

Today, journalist Adelina Ahmeti and cameraman Jetmir Hoxha of Kallxo.com were threatened by an individual with initials M.H in the village of Skënderaj, Klina e Mesme.

The citizen obstructed the team while they were adressing the construction of a church in the village.

According to this media, this person not only hindered their team but also used abusive and threatening words toward them. This was then reported to Skënderaj Police Station.

“Walk away, I swear as long as I get home I will f*** your m***…I swear to God, it’s going to be a problem for you”, were the threats that M.H. had said to them.

The Association of Journalists of Kosovo is concerned regarding the threat towards Kallxo’s colleagues and urges the Kosovo Police to prioritize the investigation.

We condemn any form of threats against journalists, cameramen and other media workers, and call on the competent authorities to bring justice to all threats and attacks against the media.

Each attack on journalists and media is an attack on freedom of expression and democracy.

BHJA: Urgently suspend the ivestigation of journalists and reject the criminal charge by the Minister Adnan Delić

0

The Board of Directors of the BH Journalists Association (BHJA)  and the Helpline for Journalists send a public protest to Adnan Delic, Minister of Labor and Social Policy of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH), for attempting to criminalize journalists and the media who wrote about his intentions to illegally distribute public money to citizens’ associations. in this entity.

Minister Delić filed a criminal charges with the Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office in Sarajevo and asked the judicial and police institutions to investigate who provided the journalists of Hayat TV and the portal Slobodna Bosna and Istraga.ba with documents on the basis of which they wrote about an attempt to illegally and non-transparently divide 728,000 KM of budget funds. . Acting on the basis of Minister Delic’s report, the Prosecutor’s Office of Sarajevo Canton issued several orders to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Sarajevo Canton, whose officials asked Hayat TV to provide them with information about the journalists who wrote the aforementioned text, so that they could “be heard as witnesses”.

Filing criminal charges against journalists and the media represents a serious attack on freedom of expression and freedom of the media, as well as an attempt to deprive journalists of their right to critically question the decisions of public officials and use information obtained from unnamed sources. The BHJA Steering Committee reminds Minister Delic that, assuming public office, he voluntarily agreed to public criticism of the way he performs his duties and makes decisions, which is why it is completely unbelievable that he reacts to media content that he does not like with a criminal report!? BHJA, therefore, remind him that in democratic societies and free political debate, ministers mostly “defend themselves” with arguments and evidence, and not by persecuting journalists or by criminalizing them with the aim of deceiving the public about real facts and ways of disposing of budget funds.

The decision of the KS Prosecutor’s Office to uncritically accept the criminal complaint of Minister Delic and resort to legal actions contrary to the standards of the Council of Europe on the protection of freedom of expression and the application of Article 10 of the European Convention on the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms is particularly surprising. The order on the collection of data on Hayat TV journalists and their eventual questioning as witnesses also contradicts the provisions of Article 96 of the Law on Criminal Procedure of the FBiH, which prohibits the questioning of journalists on the circumstance of revealing the source of information.

The Management Board of BHJA calls on the KS Prosecutor’s Office to immediately suspend all investigative actions against Hayat TV journalists as well as the Slobodna Bosna and Istraga.ba portals, to withdraw the order on the questioning of journalists as witnesses and to dismiss Delić’s criminal complaint in its entirety as unfounded. At the same time, the Board of BH Journalists gives full support to the journalists of Slobodna Bosna, Hayat TV and the Istraga.ba portal in order to protect their sources, and encourages them to refuse to provide the police with any data or documents that may violate the confidentiality and integrity of information sources, as well as trust. between information sources and these three media.

Board of Directors of BH Journalists

PHOTO: Harun Muminović

“Day X” hearing concludes with no immediate decision, leaving Julian Assange’s fate hanging in the balance

0
photo: IJAS

A UK High Court hearing to determine whether Julian Assange will be allowed a final appeal against his extradition to the United States concluded with no immediate decision, leaving the fate of the WikiLeaks publisher hanging in the balance. With Assange too unwell to attend the hearing himself, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) reiterates its calls for his urgent release.

The two-day hearing on 20 and 21 February was presided over by judges Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Johnson, who heard Assange’s defence team argue why the extradition should be blocked, and lawyers for the US government present their arguments in response. The hearing concluded with the judges reserving their decision; they gave no indication of when it might come, other than setting some internal deadlines for lawyers to provide additional information – the last of which was 4 March.

For the first time since January 2021, Assange was granted permission to attend the hearing in person or to connect from Belmarsh Prison via video link, but his lawyers said he was too unwell to do either. RSF remains concerned for Assange’s health following our last visit to him in Belmarsh on 16 January, during which he was suffering from a respiratory illness and had broken a rib from excessive coughing.

 

“We heard nothing new from the US government during this hearing – they simply doubled down on their long-standing arguments that this case is not about journalism and that Assange would be given a fair trial in the United States. But this case very much is about journalism and press freedom, and with no First Amendment protection and no public interest defence in the Espionage Act, Assange cannot receive a fair trial. While we still hope for some form of justice to be delivered in the UK, we continue our call on the US government to find a political solution to bring the case to a close and allow for Assange’s release without further delay”, said Rebecca Vincent, Director of Campaigns.

Assange’s defence lawyers presented their final grounds for appeal, including their argument that the political nature of Assange’s actions mean a political offence exemption should apply and present a legal bar to his extradition. They argued that his prosecution would represent a grave violation of freedom of speech, and that he would not be given a fair trial in the United States. They pointed to alarming reports of CIA officials planning Assange’s possible rendition or assassination, and expressed serious concern that, post extradition, the charges against Assange could be modified to allow for the possibility of the death penalty.

The US government responded by repeating its longstanding arguments about the case, emphasising that the bulk nature of the disclosures and the publication of names of implicated individuals meant that Assange’s actions went beyond the ordinary practices of journalism. They held him responsible for the unredacted dataset ending up in the public domain, even though other parties published it before WikiLeaks following a password disclosure by one of the media partners WikiLeaks worked with. They also attempted to dispute the defence’s argument that Assange, as a foreign national, would not be given First Amendment protections, despite the US prosecutor himself having said this could be the case.

RSF representatives attended the hearing in court, having been properly accredited as NGO observers for the first time in four years of monitoring the extradition proceedings. In the main courtroom, RSF and other observers were able to fully follow proceedings; however, journalists in an overflow courtroom experienced extensive difficulties in doing their jobs due to connection issues to the live feed. The court resolved these problems on the second day of the hearing. Unlike previous hearings, remote access was only granted to journalists and observers physically present in England and Wales, leaving others disappointed – particularly in the US and Australia, where journalists’ union the MEAA engaged in advocacy efforts to attempt to resolve the issue for its members.

The UK is ranked 26th, and the US is ranked 45th out of 180 countries in RSF’s 2023 World Press Freedom Index.

Cource: RSF