Home Blog Page 359

Journalists associations from the region strongly condemn attack on BH journalist Nedžad Latić

0

SARAJEVO, 23.02.2017. – The Western Balkan’s Regional Platform for Advocating Media Freedom and Journalists’ Safety, representing more than 8000 members, strongly condemns the physical attack on Nedžad Latić, the journalist and editor of the portal The Bosnia Times from Sarajevo. The attack happened on Tuesday afternoon, in front of the building Latić lives, shortly after he left the Mosque he was praying in.

The attack on Nedžad Latić that caused bodily injuries is a brutal attack on a journalist and on freedom of expression and safety of journalists. At the same time, it is kind of pressure on media freedom not to critically write about current events in BiH, including about Wahhabi members behavior.

The Platform expresses its deepest concerns about that and other attacks on journalists. We request an urgent investigation of the attack on Latić, identification of the perpetrators and the motives of the attack, as well as to take efficient legal measures.

The BH Journalists Association has documented 24 cases of threats and attacks against journalists in 2017, but just some of them have been taken to court.

The Platform will send letters of concern to all relevant authorities in BiH requesting them to prevent any form of violence against journalists, to urgently and thoroughly investigate all facts about this and other cases of violations. By doing so they will send a strong message to the public that such behavior is not acceptable. Also, The Platform will report the case to the Mapping media freedom Platform and Council of Europe to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists.

The Regional Platform strongly supports the BH Journalists Association and its efforts to protect journalists and freedom of speech.

The Platform also calls on international organizations dealing with the protection of press freedom and the rights of journalists to demand from BH authorities to urgently prosecute the perpetrator.

Attacking and threatening journalists is a direct attack on freedom of expression and the right of citizens to be informed. Each attack on journalists is the attack on public interest, democracy and rights of all citizens.

Skopje – Belgrade – Podgorica – Pristina – Sarajevo – Zagreb, 23.02.2018.

 

BH Journalists Association

Trade Union of Media of Montenegro

Croatian Journalists’ Association

Association of Journalists of Kosovo

Association of Journalists of Macedonia

Independent Journalists Association of Serbia

Six MEPs call for new EU directive against lawsuits targeting journalists

0

BRUSSELS, 23.02.2018The European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) welcomed the letter sent to Frans Timmerman, the vice-president of the European commission, initiated by six Members of the European Parliament (MEPs)  on 19 February 2018 who called for the introduction of a new EU directive that addresses Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) towards journalists.

The letter was signed by the following MEPs: David Casa (European People’s Party), Ana Gomes (Socialists and Democrats), Monica Macovei (European Conservatives and Reformists), Maite Pagazaurtundúa (Alliance of Liberals and Democrats), Stelios Kouloglou (European United Left, GUE/NGL), and Benedek Jávor (Greens).

The proposed EU Anti-SLAPP directive would aim to protect journalists from vexatious, abusive lawsuits and other forms of legal threats by companies and governments. It would include:

  • The ability for investigative journalists and independent media to request that vexatious lawsuits in the EU be expediently dismissed and claim compensation;
  • The establishment of punitive fines on firms pursuing these practices when recourse is made to jurisdictions outside the EU;
  • The setting up of a SLAPP fund to support investigative journalists and independent media that choose to resist malicious attempts to silence them and to assist in the recovery of funds due to them;
  • The setting-up of an EU register that names and shames firms that pursue these abusive practices.

“This practice is abusive, poses a threat to media freedom and has no place in the European Union”, the MEPs stated in their letter. They expressed high concern about the impact of SLAPPs in Malta, where investigative journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia was murdered in a car bomb last October. Around the time of her murder she was being sued by Pilatus Bank, a Maltese financial institution she had criticised frequently in her reports.

The MEPs are currently waiting for the European Commission to respond. David Casa stated to Maltese daily Times of Malta that they might renew the call during the European Parliament’s plenary session. “But more concretely we could also use a particular mechanism to draft the directive ourselves and send it to the Commission to propose, under a provision of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,” he explained. “What is certain is that we are determined and committed to push for this legislation for as long as necessary.” The European Federation of Journalists strongly supports this initiative.

Serbia: Concerted efforts needed to address the legacy of the past, protect media freedoms and ensure inclusive education

0
photo: pixabay

BELGRADE, 23.02.2018. – “Serbia has to move forward resolutely in addressing the legacy of the past,  establish an adequate environment for media work and overcome the remaining obstacles to inclusive education.” said today Nils Muižnieks, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, following a four-day follow-up visit to the country carried out from 19 to 22 February 2018.

Noting as an important step forward in addressing the legacy of the past, the recent discussions of the presidents of Serbia and Croatia, including the issue of missing persons from the 1990s’ war in the region, the Commissioner calls on all the countries in the region, including Serbia, to step up their work in addressing the remaining obstacles to establishing the fate of missing persons, including by opening of military and police archives that may hold important information about missing persons.

The Commissioner underlines that persistent impunity for certain serious human rights violations adversely affects justice and durable peace in the region. While he noted with interest information indicating that the prosecution of wartime crimes has been stepped up in recent months and that regional co-operation in this field has continued, the Commissioner urges the authorities to ensure that all perpetrators of serious human rights violations committed during the 1990s’ wars are brought to justice without further delays. “Any document that can shed light on serious human rights violations committed during the wars and enable the effective investigation of such crimes should be made available to relevant institutions, and decisions according to which some documents were declared a state secret should be revised in line with the pertinent recommendations of the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance.” Noting with regret that there has been no recent progress in creating a comprehensive reparation mechanism for all war victims, the Commissioner calls on the authorities to put this issue higher on their agenda and draw from positive legislative examples in the region, in particular as concerns reparations for victims of war related crimes of sexual violence.

The Commissioner is seriously concerned that certain persons convicted for war crimes by the ICTY have been given a public platform in Serbia to promote their views and deny the crimes for which they were convicted, while leading politicians have not distanced themselves from such persons, and even included them in some political processes. “This approach to dealing with the past is harmful for reconciliation in the region and is an insult to the victims of those crimes. Moreover, raising young generations in Serbia in the spirit of peace, tolerance and respect for the other, will be difficult as long as persons convicted for wartime crimes are treated in society as heroes.”

The Commissioner was pleased to note the additional progress made by Serbia in ensuring systematic birth registration of Roma and providing them with personal identity documents. He encourages the authorities to make additional efforts to resolve about 2000 remaining cases of Roma lacking personal identity documents.

As concerns freedom of the media, the Commissioner noted the agreement of all media actors that he met that Serbia has a solid legislative framework governing this field. ”Serbia also has great investigative journalists, some of whom have been presented with prestigious international awards. The Commissioner for Information of Public Importance, whose importance for investigative journalists’ work cannot be overstated, is a model institution that should be fully supported by the authorities and whose decisions need to be fully complied with.”

However, the Commissioner noted many concerns about a deteriorating situation for the work of journalists and media since his previous visit. The safety of journalists remains an issue of concern, and despite some efforts by the authorities to ensure a better institutional response to crimes against journalists, few such cases have been effectively prosecuted.  Smear campaigns, inflammatory remarks and other forms of pressure against journalists have increased and have led to self-censorship and discouraged journalists from performing their important work. The Commissioner called on the authorities to investigate and prosecute all crimes against journalists. “Politicians are urged to unequivocally condemn all cases of violence targeting journalists who play such a crucial watchdog role in the society.” The Commissioner noted some serious challenges in the implementation of the project-based funding of media, introduced in 2014, which entails state financial support at national and local level for media projects of public interest. “Lack of transparency, politically motivated decisions and funding awarded to tabloids and media known to be violating media ethics are among the serious challenges that need to be addressed by the authorities in this context.”

Underlining the importance of inclusive education for social cohesion and the educational opportunities of all children, the Commissioner was pleased to note some positive developments in this field. “I find the authorities’ clear commitment to inclusive education and their wide acceptance of the principle of inclusion of all children in mainstream education, including children with disabilities and Roma, crucial for making further progress in this field. Another positive development is that Roma children are no longer systematically sent to special schools, which violated their rights and perpetuated their marginalisation. It is also very important that the authorities have recognised the importance of mandatory pre-school classes and the work of pedagogical assistants for better inclusion of children in mainstream education and that further improvements in this context have been planned.”

Notwithstanding these positive developments, the Commissioner called on the authorities to enhance their efforts to ensure full inclusion in mainstream education of all Roma children and children with disabilities. He was seriously concerned by the effects of 2009 legislation which provides for a possibility that parents choose a school for their children regardless of their place of residence, which has facilitated so-called “white flight” from certain elementary schools and exacerbated the segregation of Roma children. One such school was the school Sutjeska in Zemun visited by the Commissioner, in which an increasing percentage of students were Roma. The Commissioner urged the authorities to address this issue by reintroducing the catchment area system as a precondition for de-segregation of such schools.

Noting the importance of the provision of children with disabilities with personal assistants for their better inclusion in mainstream education and the lack of funding in some local communities for the engagement of such assistants, the Commissioner called on the authorities to find a systemic solution in this regard to further inclusion. Last but not least, the Commissioner urged the authorities to make enhanced efforts to include children with disabilities residing in six institutions for social care in mainstream education.

Amnesti internešenal: Vučić napadao aktiviste preko svojih medija

0

BEOGRAD, 23.02.2018. – U Srbiji je nastavljena nekažnjivost zločina po međunarodnom pravu, a klevete zvaničnika i medija bliskih vladi stvaraju toksično okruženje za nezavisne medije i aktiviste tranzicione pravde.

To se navodi u najnovijem izveštaju organizacije za zaštitu ljudskih prava Amnesti internešenala (Amnesty International) za 2017. godinu.

U izveštaju, koji je objavljen danas, ističe se da su istraživački novinari u Srbiji podvrgnuti kampanjama blaćenja od ministara i medija bliskih vladi, da je privatno obezbeđenje vladajuće stranke fizički napalo šest novinara koji su izveštavali sa mitinga tokom inauguracije Aleksandra Vučića 31. maja, kao i da su novinari KRIK-a dobijali pretnje smrću, a da je novinarki Dragani Pećo obijen stan.

Naglašava se da je u septembru politička partija ministra odbrane Aleksandra Vulina optužila glavnog i odgovornog urednika KRIK-a, Stevana Dojčinovića da je „narkoman“ i „strani plaćenik“, a sve zbog toga što je KRIK istraživao imovinu ministra Vulina.

Amnesti naglašava da su aktivisti za tranzicionu pravdu napadani od strane najviših zvaničnika, uključujući i Aleksandra Vučića, preko provladinih medija i društvenih mreža.

Huligani su u januaru, na ulazu u kancelariju Inicijative mladih za ljudska prava, ostavili kese sa lažnim novcem i nalepnice „strani plaćenici“, piše u izveštaju. Kako se dodaje, aktivisti i aktivistkinje Inicijative mladih fizički su napadnuti na tribini vladajuće stranke na kojoj je govorio haški osuđenik Veselin Šljivančanin.

U izveštaju se navodi da su bivši srpski vojni komandanti posle odsluženih kazni izrečenih pred Haškim tribunalom sve češće dobijali uticajne položaje, ali i podseća da je u maju Snežana Stanojković izabrana za glavnu tužiteljku za ratne zločine, da su izrečene samo tri presude za ratne zločine i da su sve bile oslobađajuće.

Ističe se i da je nastavljeno ponovno suđenje za bivše vojnike optužene za ratne zločine na Kosovu, uključujući prvu optužnicu za silovanje, da je u julu zaustavljeno suđenje osmorici bosanskih Srba koji se terete za ubistvo 1.303 bošnjačka civila u okolini Srebrenice, jer je optužnica podignuta u vreme kada nije bilo tužioca za ratne zločine. Međutim, dodaje se da je nakon žalbe suđenje ipak nastavljeno.

Amnesti podseća i da je Apelacioni sud u oktobru odbacio optužbe protiv bosanskih Srba za otmicu u Štrpcima, da porodice žrtava nisu priznate kao civilne žrtve rata, jer su im članovi porodice umrli izvan teritorije Srbije.

„Porodice žrtava kosovskih Srba pozvale su u maju vladu da učini napredak u pronalaženju tela nestalih“, piše u izveštaju i naglašava da nema napretka u gonjenju odgovornih za transport i zakopavanje tela kosovskih Albanaca sa Kosova tokom 1999. godine. Dodaje se i da je u novembru pred Haškim tribunalom osuđen Ratko Mladić, kao i da je u avgustu 10 osoba oslobođeno optužbi da su mu pomagali dok je bio u bekstvu.

Amnesti navodi da su u aprilu održane masovne demonstracije i protesti protiv izborne korupcije i pristrasnosti medija nakon predsedničkih izbora na kojima je pobedila vladajuća stranka.

„Iako je Komitet UN protiv torture glasao protiv izručenja kurdskog aktiviste Dževdeta Ajaza, Srbija ga je u decembru vratila u Tursku gde ga čeka sigurni zatvor“, navodi se u izveštaju.

Amnesti navodi da romske porodice u Beogradu i dalje žive u nehigijenskim naseljima, da su im uskraćena socijalna i ekonomska prava, poput prava na zdravstvo, obrazovanje, vodu, da su pod rizikom prisilnih izbacivanja, ali i da policija maltretira Rome. Naglašava se i da su izbeglice i migranti blokirani u Srbiji, kao i da su oni koji su pokušali da uđu u Evropsku uniju preko Mađarske i Hrvatske nasilno vraćani u Srbiju.

Dodaje se da je u januaru do 1.800 izbeglica i migranata živelo u napuštenim skladištima, i to često na temperaturi ispod nule, te da su do maja izbačeni i prebačeni u pretrpane vladine centre u kojima su uslovi neadekvatni.

Srbija je proglasila 18. maj za Dan sećanja na žene koje su ubijene od strane muževa i partnera, ističe se u izveštaju i podseća da su organizacije koje se bore za ženska prava protestovale u julu, jer vlasti nisu zaštitile dve žene i jedno dete koje su ubili bivši muževi, i to ispred centara za socijalni rad u Beogradu.

U novembru, dodaje se, Srbija je ratifikovala Istanbulsku konvenciju za spečavanje nasilja nad ženama.

Nedostatak dogovora Srbije i Kosova

U izveštaju Amnesti internešenala se ističe da nedostatak dogovora o uzajamnoj pravnoj pomoći Kosova i Srbije ometa procesuiranje Srba osumnjičenih za ratne zločine tokom sukoba 1998. i 1999. godine, uključujući i seksualno nasilje. Navodi se da bi stotine nerešenih slučajeva trebalo da bude prebačeno u junu 2018. u kancelariju Specijalnog tužioca Kosova, te da su tužioci, nevladine organizacije i žrtve seksualnog nasilja za vreme sukoba zabrinuti da svedočenja koja je Unmik sakupio nisu na odgovarajući način istražena.

Amnesti podseća da bivša predsednica Kosova Atifete Jahjaga nije mogla da dođe u Beograd u junu kako bi predstavila knjigu svedočenja žrtava seksualnog nasilja za vreme rata, kao i da stigma povezana sa silovanjem za vreme ratnih sukoba i dalje opterećuje žrtve. U izveštaju Amnestija navodi se da je mali napredak ostvaren u pronalaženju nestalih i da se na spisku nalazi 1.658 ljudi. Takođe se ističe da je Specijalni sud za Kosovo formiran 28. juna u Hagu, a da kosovski poslanici nisu u decembru uspeli da ukinu zakon o tom sudu, koji smatraju da diskriminiše protiv OVK.

Brnabić i LGBT

„Imenovanje Ane Bnabić za premijerku Srbije i njeno prisustvo na Paradi ponosa su neki ocenili kao napredak. Međutim, vlasti nisu zaštitile LGBT osobe i organizacije od diskriminacije, fizičkih napada i pretnji“, ističe se u izveštaju Amnestija i dodaje da je u aprilu Komitet UN za ljudska prava urgirao da Srbija efektivnije primeni zločin iz mržnje.

Security forcibly removes a journalist from Kosovo’s Assembly

0

PRISTINA, 22.02.2018 – The Association of Journalists of Kosovo condemns the violent remove of a journalist from Kosovo’s Assembly on Thursday by a security individual. The latter first introduced himself as part of the cabinet of President of Assembly, and then as a member of Kosovo police.

According to incident report, the journalist was standing in front of the office of Assembly Speaker, Kadri Veseli where a meeting was taking place with representatives of political parties.

“Initially a person came out of office and asked me for accreditation and I presented it. Then, second person came out and told me that the accreditation has expired last December and I cannot stay there. But, we and other media have applied in time for renewal and it is the Assembly that has not proceeded with media accreditation,” Osmani told AJK. “He strongly holds my arm and forcibly took me out of the Assembly building.”

The AJK considers that this event is a direct obstacle of work of media and condemns the violent act against the journalist, despite that there was a clarification among them about the expired accreditation. No one has the right to act with violence against media workers and in particular in situations when the reporting has direct interests for the public of our country.

This event once again reveals the mentality and the lack of respect of our public institutions for the work of journalists.

Талеска: Новинарите треба да ја презентираат вистината, а не да слугуваат

0

СКОПЈЕ, 22.02.2018 – Моника Талеска е долгогодишна новинарка, која со своето искуство и професионализам дава максимум од себе за новинарството како на локално, така и на централно ниво. Во моментот таа е советничка за односи со јавноста во Општина Прилеп и во разговор со ЦИВИЛ Медиа, зборуваше од двете позиции за слободата на медиумите, предизвиците со кои се соочуваат, како и за потребите за подобрување на состојбата на медиумите Македонија. 

ЦИВИЛ Медиа: Што за вас претставува слободата на изразување и слободата на медиумите?

Талеска: Секој граѓанин треба да има право да го каже слободно своето мислење, своите ставови, да ги дефинира, да ги манифестира секаде, се разбира во една рамка што значи цивилизирано однесување. Во овој контекст особено е значајна слободата на медиумите.

Медиумите се всушност креатори на јавното мислење. Продукцијата на вести засновани на начелата на новинарство, што значи тшчно, вистинито и балансирано информирање, се темелот на она што значи објективно новинарство, креирање на јавното мислење, согласно овие начела. Само тогаш, кога имаме слободни медиуми, ќе имаме е објективно јавно мислење. Во спротивно се соочуваме со она што значи спин конструкција, креирање на лажна слика за реалноста, а вистината е нешто друго.

За 12 години Македонија, македонските граѓани, македонското новинарство, беа заробеници на една слика на објективната реалност. Најголем дел од медиумите беа слуги на власта. Многу новинари отстапија од новинарските начела, а голем дел и од постулатите на едно граѓанско општество. На тој начин станаа слуги и сервис на режимот, а медиумите одиграа една значајна улога во одржување на недемократска власт.

Граѓаните беа загобени, институциите, исто така, но со доаѓането на новата власт, забележителен е еден процес на враќање на медиумите на добар пат. Навистина, тешко, споро оди овој процес, меѓутоа кога зборуваме за националните медиуми, можеме да кажеме дека се враќаат кон базичното новинарство.

Ако ова го проектирам во локални рамки, не може да се каже. Во Прилеп нема многу новинари што се отвораат кон процесите… имаме еднострано информирање, за жал, сè уште е таква состојбата… Дел од локална телевизија или весник сè уште своето информирање го темелат на спинови и деинформирање. Но, како што вели народната поговорка, вистината е танка, но не се кине…

ЦИВИЛ Медиа: Дали некогаш сте се соочиле со притисоци од бизнис или политичките центри на моќ и како сте се справиле со нив?

Талеска: Ќе звучи можеби позиционо, како да сум приврзаник на некоја политичка партија, иако не сум и сметам дека тоа се коси со етиката, моралот и кодексот на еден новинар. Во моментот сум ангажирана како советник за односи со јавност во Општина Прилеп и можам и од таа позиција да говорам, но и како новинар.

Во 12 години режим, во првите неколку не, но потоа имаше толку силен притисок на еден локален медиум, којшто власта целосно го згасна и затвори. Можам да кажам дека сум очевидец на процес на уништување и руинирање на локален медиум што во себе инкорпорираше телевизија, радио и весник. Со тоа беше пресечен како со ножици гласот на народот. Овој медиум имаше традиција од 50 години ги ставија пред свршен чин да не можат да добијат објективна информација.

Јас лично со претходната власт бев изложена на притисоци и закани, дури и лични закани примив и од претходниот градоначалник Марјан Ристески, со еден недоличен вокабулар, со едно многу примитивно однесување. Зошто? Затоа што токму на ПивоФест, како дописник на ТВ Телма, сакав да информирам за реконструкцијата на џамијата во Прилеп какокултурен споменик. Барањето на став во било кое време е право на медиумот и новинарот. Никогаш, претставниците на институциите, особено од локалната самоуправа и градоначалникот од било која провиниенција не смее да се меша во работењето на медиумите.

Во тој период бев изложена и на други притисоци, закани, бев туркана, фрлани беа реквизитите, камерата, микрофонот…колата ми ја оштетија во повеќе наврати… Одите на прес-конференција, поставувате прашање, секогаш те оцрнет бидејќи ја барате вистината.

Она што сакам да го порачам како советник за односи со јавноста, ова досега беше како новинар, а го знаат прилепските новинари, иако дел од нив прават спинови дека во секој момент можат да добијат информации за сè што е во интерес на граѓаните. Среќа имаме градоначалник што има демократски хабитус. и покрај тоа што дел од медиумит прават спинови, дезинформираат или неинформираат за работата на локалната власт, тој има навистина доблест да ги повика и да поразговара и да ја презентира вистината…

ЦИВИЛ Медиа: Што е потребно за одбрана на слободата на медиумите?

Талеска: Закон има. Според мене потреба е свесност кај граѓаните дека се манипулирани. Со следење на вестите  од два -три медиуми, секако дека секој граѓанин без оглед на тоаколку има или нема едукација за новинарство, ќе дојде до она што значи објективна вистина.

Меѓутоа есенцијата на оваа прашање лежи во природата на новинарот. Колку новинарот како човек е посветен и е одраз на она што значи граѓанска одговорност. Колку тој како човек ги почитува законите, колку го почитува кодексот на новинарството, колку во себе ја носи свесноста дека мора да биде одговорен пред себе, да ја презентира вистината, да ги презентира фактите, а не да биде нечиј слуга.

Секој новинар е човек, секој човек има слабости. Кој на каков начин ќе подлегне на притисоците или ќе го транпа својот професионален или човечки дигнитет за одредени интереси, тоа е сепак личен избор.

Биљана Јордановска

Камера: Дехран Муратов


Овој проект е финансиран од Европската Унија преку програмата за мали грантови „Заштита на слободата на медиумите и слободата на изразување во Западен Балкан“ спроведена од Здружението на хрватските новинари, како дел од регионалниот проект „Регионална платформа на Западен Балкан за слобода на медиумите и безбедност на новинарите”, спроведена преку партнерство на шест регионални новинарски здруженија – Здружение на независни новинари на Србија, Здружение на новинари од Босна и Херцеговина, Здружение на новинари на Хрватска, Здружение на новинари на Косово, Здружение на новинари на Македонија и Синдикатот на медиуми на Црна Гора.

Islamic Community in BiH condemned the attack on Nedzad Latic

0

SARAJEVO, 21.02.2018. -The Islamic Community in BiH condemns the physically attack on the journalists and publicist Nedzad Latic and especially because of the fact that the incident is observed as related to the mosque.

The Islamic Community  expects from the authorities to investigate all the circumstances related to this attack. It is unacceptable to be accustomed to living in a society that is used to resolve misunderstandings violently, especially if violence is used because of public statements and from people who are connected with the mosque and its sacred space. The mosques should in no case be related to violent and inappropriate behavior.

Public Announcement regarding the physical attack on Nedžad Latić

0

SARAJEVO, 21.02.2018. – The Steering Committee of BHJA strongly condemns the physical attack on the publicist and editor off the portal The Bosnia Times from Sarajeva. The attack happened on Tuesday afternoon, in front of the building Latić lives in, shorty after leaving the Mosque he was praying in.

Causing bodily injuries and the attack on Nedžad Latić is a brutal attack on freedom of expression and endagerment of safety of journalists, as well as a harsh attempt of suppression media freedom and critical writing on actual events in Sarajevo, including the behavior of some members of the Wahhabi movement.

The Steering Committee of BHJA requests an urgent investigation of all circumstances of the attack on Latić, identifying the perpetrators and the motives of attack, and to take legally prescribed measures in a fast and efficient manner, which will show how police structures and judicial institutions respond responsibly and timely in cases of attacks on journalists and endangering their security.

Steering Committee of BHJA expresses its deepest concernsabout the fact that this is another assault in February, which occurred immediately after performing a private religious rite in one of the Sarajevo mosques and is linked to journalistic work. Freelance journalist Faruk Vele  reported verbal attacks and threats that were directed to him through a number of online portals, that followed immediately after prayers at the Mosque “Careva Džamija” in Sarajevo, on which the religious leader stated that for some journalists is should be prayed as if they were death, although they are alive.

Steering Committee of BHJA does not link the attacks on journalists Nedžad Latić and Faruk Vela and the endangerment  their security with the activities of the Islamic Community in BiH, but expects from this, and all the other, religious institution to publicly condemn the disputable speech held in the Mosque “Careva džamija”as well as to act more proactive in preventing the speech and behavior of believers who may, in a direct or indirect way, question the freedom of the media and the security of journalists.

 

Steering Committee of BH Journalists Association

Serbia: the safety of journalists outside the state’s sphere of competence

0

BELGRADE, 20.02.2018. – Since the beginning of this year, fifteen journalists have suffered threats and attacks. Representatives of the authorities say that they condemn such attacks, but reject any responsibility for the pressures to which journalists in Serbia are exposed on a daily basis.

“Everyone is responsible for themselves”, said State Secretary of Serbian Ministry of Culture and Information Aleksandar Gajović, commenting on the attack against N1 TV journalist Nikola Radišić, who was assaulted and insulted in the street. The attack followed a series of harsh criticisms directed against the editorial policy of this independent television broadcaster, which Serbian president Aleksandar Vučić refers to as “American”, while Interior Minister Nebojša Stefanović calls it CIA’s TV station.

In a recent interview with Radio Slobodna Evropa, Gajović said that the issue of attacks against journalists does not fall within the competence of the Ministry of Culture and Information, adding that “real journalists and real newsrooms need to listen to the other side as well”, and that he expects an explanation from the aggressors, whose identity is still unknown. “I would like to know their side of the story as well, did they really do it or not. Of course we are going to condemn every attack, but first I want to see what is behind these attacks, who is hiding behind them, if anyone is hiding”.

Later in the same interview, when asked about the death threats that appeared on social media against Nedim Sejdinović, president of the Independent Association of Journalists of Vojvodina (NDNV), Gajović responded with a counter-question: “Are you really sure it wasn’t him that organised it all, in order to present himself as a victim?”, concluding, “I think that man doesn’t have good intentions”.

These statements provoked strong reactions from the main Serbian journalists’ organisations, which requested Gajović’s dismissal, but prime minister Ana Brnabić avoids taking position on the issue, simply ensuring that “attacks of any kind are unacceptable and will not be tolerated”.

Intolerance of criticism

According to data from the Independent Association of Journalists of Serbia (NUNS), since the beginning of the year there have been 15 cases of attacks, serious threats, and pressure against journalists.

The motivation behind these intimidatory acts is always the same: journalists’ critical stance towards the political establishment. Following the murder of Kosovo Serb politician Oliver Ivanović – that happened on January 16th in the northern part of Mitrovica and was preceded by a months-long demonisation by Serbian pro-government media, which labelled him as traitor – Beta News Agency editor-in-chief Dragan Janjić tweeted: “The elimination of political opponents has begun”. In a press conference later that day, president Vučić made explicit reference to Janjić and then said: “None of us are murderers, as some would wish”.

Although Janjić didn’t accuse Serbian authorities of involvement in Ivanović’s death nor did he call anyone a murderer, after the above-mentioned press conference he became target of threats. One of the posts appeared on Facebook containing accusations against Janjić also contained his home address, while among hundreds of hostile comments there were some explicit exhortations to lynching, such as: “Take him to Kalemegdan and shoot him in the forehead” or “Hang him in the square”.

On top of that, in the beginning of February prime minister Ana Brnabić targeted NUNS president Slaviša Lekić saying that “calling an elected head of state a murderer, like NUNS president did, is contrary to European values”, alluding to Lekić’s alleged position regarding Ivanović’s assassination. Reacting to this statement, Lekić announced that he will file a lawsuit against the prime minister, who “will have to appear before a judge because of such an offense and lie”.

Journalists as “enemies” of the state

Tamara  Skrozza, a journalist from weekly newspaper Vreme, has been vilified for days by pro-government TV channel Pink just because she participated, as a member of the board of directors of non-governmental organisation CRTA, in a press conference presenting the final report on the media monitoring conducted during the period preceding the official start of the Belgrade local elections campaign.

Although more than 300 journalists and citizens submitted a complaint to the Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (REM), denouncing the defamation campaign against Skrozza, this institution has not yet determined whether TV Pink violated professional standards, nor has it undertaken any measure envisaged by legislation in cases like this.

The campaign against Skrozza started after president Vučić, appearing on a television programme, associated NGO CRTA, involved in electoral observation activities, with a foreign embassy (without specifying which one), concluding: “The whole plan is to make SNS [Vučić’s party] lose”.

It has become customary for pro-government media to follow up on such statements, often made by president Vučić and some other state functionaries, with defamation campaigns against independent media and journalists, labelling them as traitors and foreign mercenaries working against their own country.

That is why few were surprised when, on the night of February 5th, the front door of NUNS’s offices was covered, for the second time in just a few days, with leaflets saying: “Miserable association of enemies of Serbia”. Given the overall atmosphere of hostility towards independent journalists, few believe that the Attorney’s Office will bring to justice not only those responsible for this last incident, but also many others who, anonymously or publicly, threaten journalists on social media or in the street, as happened in the case of TV N1 journalist.

The messages coming from the highest representatives of the state encourage intimidating behaviour towards journalists. Although Brussels has warned Serbia that the respect of media freedom is a prerequisite for further progress towards the EU, and although many international organisations, like Reporters Without Borders, continuously denounce pressures put on independent journalists and media in Serbia, Belgrade’s political establishment denies any responsability for the present situation.

A recently published study conducted by the Slavko Ćuruvija Foundation, titled “Control and freedom of the media: journalists’ testimonies”, shows that 74% of journalists in Serbia think that there are serious obstacles to the exercise of press freedom, or that there aren’t even the conditions for it, while nearly two thirds of the journalists interviewed believe that “the media are mainly controlled by the political establishment”.

According to data from NUNS, in 2017 there were 92 cases of attacks, threats, and pressure against journalists and the media. The latter cannot even count on adequate legal protection, because the judiciary is getting less and less immune to the pressures exercised by the ruling party, guided by president Vučić. Judging by recurrence, number,

According to data from NUNS, in 2017 there were 92 cases of attacks, threats, and pressure against journalists and the media. The latter cannot even count on adequate legal protection, because the judiciary is getting less and less immune to the pressures exercised by the ruling party, guided by president Vučić. Judging by recurrence, number, and nature of the attacks against journalists reported in the first month and a half of 2018, as well as by rhetoric and actions of representatives of the political power, it seems that the state is not at all willing to make efforts to ensure the safety of journalists.

This publication has been produced within the project European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, co-funded by the European Commission. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso and its partners and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The project’s page