Home Blog Page 388

Rakić Vodinelić: Tužilaštvo diskriminiše napadnute

0

BEOGRAD, 21.11.2017. – Predstavnici medijskih udruženja sastaće se danas kako bi se dogovorili oko izlaska ili zamrzavanja rada svojih članova u stalnoj radnoj grupi za bezbednost novinara, kao reakciju na odluku Prvog osnovnog tužilaštva da odbaci krivične prijave za napade na novinare tokom inauguracije predsednika Aleksandra Vučića.

Tužilaštvo je odbacilo krivičnu prijavu protiv obezbeđenja SNS za napad na novinarku Danasa Lidiju Valtner, kao i novinare Insajdera, Vajsa, učesnika Protesta protiv diktature Marka Radosavljevića i “povremenog” foto-reportera Tanjuga.

O sledećem koraku odlučivaće NUNS, NDNV, ANEM, AOM, LP i ASMEDI, a pozvan je i UNS, saznaje Danas nezvanično, a uz to će formulisati zahteve za nastavak neometanog rada stalne radne grupe za bezbednost novinara. U toj radnoj grupi učestvuju i predstavnici nadležnih državnih organa – Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova i Republičkog javnog tužilaštva.

Ono što novinarima sada preostaje, savetuje profesorka prava Vesna Rakić Vodinelić, jeste da ulože prigovor Višem javnom tužilaštvu zbog odbacivanja krivične prijave protiv napadača.

– Treba izjaviti prigovor nadležnom Višem tužilaštvu, a ako i ono odbije slučaj kao što bi se moglo očekivati, onda postoji mogućnost žalbe Ustavnom sudu, a posle i Evropskom sudu za ljudska prava – predlaže Rakić Vodinelić, dodajući da je svesna nepoverenja koje postoji prema našem pravnom sistemu. Dok se ovaj proces ne završi neće biti moguće vođenje prekršajnih postupaka, kako je Više javno tužilaštvo naložilo MUP da podnese prekršajne prijave, objašnjava Rakić Vodinelić.

– Ne mogu se istovremeno zbog iste radnje voditi prekršajni i krivični postupak, možete povesti jedan od njih, nije nikakva greška povesti krivični umesto prekršajnog. Ovde se može razgovarati o prekršaju jer redari koji obezbeđuju skup a ne pripadaju policiji su kao i svi drugi građani dužni da poštuju javni red i mir i ne smeju se fizički obračunavati, naglašava ona.

Profesorka prava ističe da je problematično obrazloženje Tužilaštva o ponašanju redara jer su se više oslonili na njihove iskaze nego na fotografije koje pokazuju njihovo ponašanje.

– Tužilaštvo je poverovalo da su redari zapravo spasili, između ostalog i novinare od linča. Iz toga proizilazi zaključak da Tužilaštvo u stvari smatra da taj skup nije bio namenjen samo slavljenju izbora predsednika, nego i linču neistomišljenika, to je jedini logičan zaključak koji kao pravnik mogu izvući. Ako je tako, onda postoji odgovornost sazivača skupa Srpske napredne stranke, i ne samo to, nego vidimo da javno tužilaštvo tako misli, ukazuje Rakić Vodinelić.

Policija okretala glavu

Vesna Rakić Vodinelić naglašava i da se na fotografijama vidi da je prisutna policija u uniformi, koja stoji u blizini i okreće glavu na drugu stranu dok su novinari i građani napadani, a da je tužilaštvo to moralo da uzme u obzir. Ona je podsetila i na reakciju nadležnih organa kada je napadnuta novinarka Pinka tokom skupa pokreta Dveri, zaključujući da “dolazimo do nečega što je mnogo opasnije od vizure političkih stranaka, a to je diskriminacija od strane državnih organa kao što su u ovom slučaju policija, tužilaštvo…”.

Minister files lawsuit against investigative portal KRIK

0

BELGRADE, 21.11.2017. – Following Belgrade-based investigative portal KRIK’s publishing of international research into business operations in offshore zones called “Paradise Documents”, Nenad Popović, Minister without Portfolio in the Serbian Government, announced that he would sue them.

KRIK reported that Popović had at least seven overseas companies, and that he was seeking to reorganise his fortune by establishing new companies.

According to KRIK’s claims, the agency that was supposed to implement his plans labeled him as a high-risk client, due to which he was unable to transfer some of his companies to offshore zones.

Popović stated that KRIK was publishing false information about him, the aim of which was to “discredit him as a politician and a holder of a state function”, and that the agency did not refuse him and he does not have offshore companies.

At KRIK they consider this an attack with which Popović “avoids explaining that which he has repeated several times – that he does not have offshore companies”.

Participant about the Journalists Academy 2017

0

JAHORINA, 21.10.2017. –

vedranaVedrana Lemez, fourth year of journalism at the Faculty of Philosophy, Pale: “I expect to find out more about gender-based violence at the Journalists Academy. Since I think that a good choice of lecturers for all three days of the Academy was made and that these are people with long years of professional experience, which will be useful to all of us. The problem is that gender-based violence in BiH is not adequately addressed, the media are not always professional at reporting this issue and there is not enough critical review or research journalism, encluding plans that will be long-term for victims of violence. ”

mersihaMersiha Čomor, student of the first year of International Relations and Diplomacy, Mostar: “From the Journalists Academy, I expect the expansion of knowledge on gender-based violence, because I have not met this topic before. A person does not deserve to be a victim, any kind of violence. ”

 

 

 

 

simonaSimona Joksimović, second year of the Faculty of Political Science, Banja Luka: “I believe that gender-based violence is a very important and important topic that should be much more discussed because it is the worst thing that can happen to a woman or girl. I learned how I should reporton gender-based violence in the future and how empathy and empathy are really important in casual conversations. Our task as future journalists is to draw more attention to the importance of this problem and to help victims of violence to get the right help. A good weapon for the prevention of gender-based violence and an indicator of the possibilities of solving the problem of violence. “

 

bobanaBobana Ćevriz, a student of the fourth year of journalism at the Faculty of Philosophy, Pale: “It is a great honor and pleasure to be a part of this training, and at the Journalists Academy I had the opportunity to learn new things and to improve my knowledge in the field of gender-based violence. Through discussion with brilliant lecturers, we came to the conclusion that violence against women is increasing in our society, and that the media often send the wrong message to the public, and media space is given to perpetrators rather than victims. Media should report on violence against women, to submit more information about Safe Houses and solutions to women who are victims of violence, to provide support for them to seek help and talk about their problems. “

kanitaKanita Beširović, a student of the fourth year of the Faculty of Philosophy in Tuzla, the journalism department: “Journalists academy is a new and interesting experience for me. First of all, I learned a lot of useful information from our lecturers starting from ethical reporting on violence against women until understanding what do women victims of violence go through.”

 

 

almedinaAlmedina Atlagić, a student of the fourth year of the Faculty of Philosophy in Tuzla, department of Journalism: “This is my first participation at the Journalists Academy and I am very pleased to be here with all these young people. I have not been so well-versed in this topic. For these three days, the Academy has surpassed all my expectations, both in lectures and in lecturers who have worked most professionally to teach us something. in order to better understand and solve the problem as easily as possible. ”

 

ivanIvan Stojnić, a student of the third year of journalism and communication at the Faculty of Political Science, Banja Luka: “Today we witness various forms of violence, especially over women and girls, and I believe that it is necessary for the whole society to engage in finding the right solution and to exclude violence. The Academy is a new experience in which I expanded my knowledge of gender-based violence, but also met new people who expressed their opinions about the state of the media and how it is being reported today about women who have suffered violence. I like the critical approach to this topic as well as the way it is presented. We as future media workers need to be educated on how to report professionally and ethically tomorrow about violence against women. ”

sanjinSanjin Gajip, First year student of the Faculty of Media and Communication, Travnik: “At the Journalists Academy, I gained new experiences, met different people and heard new thinking. As for the topic, I deepened my knowledge of violence during this academy and through my profession I will try to keep the public informed about this and prevent the further spread of violence. I recommend participating at the Academy to all young journalists, as this is another experience in life. ”

 

kristina-gadzeKristina Gadže, a student of the third year of journalism at the Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Mostar: “The Journalists academy gave me an excellent insight into the topic of gender-based violence that is now ubiquitous. Media insufficiently represent this problem as a social problem and try to present a man as a victim of different circumstances. I believe that institutions responsible for solving this form of violence should be more actively involved and support the victims of violence. “

Gender-Based Violence in BiH: For perpetrators most commonly conditional sentences

0

JAHORINA, 20.10.2017. – Violence against women always implies a certain form of discrimination and violation of human rights, and the struggle against gender-based violence demands a dramatic turnaround in human consciousness and public perception of this social problem, was highlighted, at the Journalist Academy 2017 for journalism students “Reporting on Gender Issues based violence “that is being held in Jahorina.

Fatima Bećirović from Gender Center of FBiH , a visiting lecturer at the educational workshop, pointed out that violence as a social problem should be addressed by the state, through institutions and by applying laws. Nevertheless, punishment for perpetrators of gender-based violence and domestic violence is often much milder than what is legally foreseen.

“According to statistics, the Municipal Court Zenica pronounces the highest penalties for cases of domestic violence and thus represents an example of good judicial practice in dealing with cases of gender-based violence. In cases of other courts, the data is mostly devastating, “Bećirović said, adding that “in more than 70% of the cases the sentences are imposed, while a small percentage of prison sentences and fines “.

Fatima Šušnjar

Fatima Šušnjar, coordinator  of The safe house in Bihać, run by a non-governmental organization “Women from Una”, talked about what goes through a woman suffering from domestic violence and presented a series of violence and opportunities to escape from it.

“When a woman comes out of the circle of violence she has three options, namely SOS call, addressing the police and the social work center. However, women who survived violence, especially in rural areas, often do not know or to whom to invoke or to call, said Šušnjar.

Kristina Ljevak

Journalist and activist Kristina Ljevak spoke about the harmfulness of the stereotypical way of presenting women in the media. “Stereotypes and women’s discrimination in media is most prominent in the advertising industry,” said Ljevak, adding that future journalists are bound to speak affirmatively about the rights of women.

The Spanish movie “Te doy mis ojosi”, shows the social problem of gender-based violence through a love and life story was showen tot he participants.

Journalists academy gathered participants from Sarajevo, Banja Luka, Tuzla, Ljubuški, Višegrad, Easter Sarajevo, Mostar, Pale and Bugojno, and is part of the project “Disconnect Violence – Media against Violence against Women” implemented by the Association of BH journalists with support UN Women Offices in BiH and the Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency (Sida).

CJA condemns threats against freelancer Domagoj Margetić

0

ZAGREB, 21.11.2017. – Croatian Journalists’ Association (CJA) condemns repeated threats against freelancer Domagoj Margetić, especially frequent in last few days.

After new serial of TV show „Uncensored“ done by Domagoj Margetić for Mreža TV was announced, our colleague Margetić received many threats by e-mail and through social networks. His new serial deals with cases of war profiteering.

Most of messages were anonymous, some asking for his eviction from Croatia, stating he was a traitor, that he should be beaten up, his bones be broken, asking him for coffee „that will be your last“. From Facebook profile even the messages was sent involving Margetić’s home address with additional note: „If someone is close, he should visit that ridiculous person so he would be afraid when coming home.“

Domagoj Margetić has been threatened frequently, has experienced several physical attacks, even survived attempted murder. New wave of threats and publishing his address CJA considers to be call for lynch. Threats have been reported to the police.

Latest threats against Domagoj Margetić are 12th case of attacks against journalists this year. Threats varied from calls for verbal to physical violence. CJA calls for responsible institutions to react immediately and efficiently.

We also point out that most cases of threats and attacks against journalists have not been solved yet and we call once more political leaders to publicly condemn every kind of violence against journalists.

 

Selmani warned, the government wants to put censorship in the media

0

SKOPJE, 21.11.2017 – The Ministry of Information Society and Administration yesterday in Skopje organized a debate on the Draft Law on Audio and Audiovisual Media Services.

AJM President Naser Selmani accused the Government that by attempting to impose fines on unethical media reporting they try to put censorship, which is banned by the Macedonian constitution. Selmani explained that the Government is eager to put a hand on media content and play the role of editor-in-chief and tell reporters what is ethical and what is unethical reporting.

“You are inconsistent in your views, on one hand you say that you support self-regulation in the media, and on the other hand you propose penalties for journalist’s ethics. What will the Council of Media Ethics and the Council of Honor of the AJM work if You tell the journalists how they should write. You will penalize the media with 5.000 euros, and the responsible person with 1.500 euros. By doing so, you practically introduce censorship”, Selmani said, adding that people who participated in writing this article of the law are not only major enemies of freedom of speech, but also directly work against the credibility of this Government that wants to be shown as a reformatting Government.

He says that if the fines for ethical reporting are not deleted, Macedonia risks to break the European Convention for Human Rights, which i obligated to respect as a member of the Council of Europe. “Article 10 from the Convention defines when the freedom of speech can be restricted. With this article you are going out of those frames and you are introducing new limitations”, Selmani warned.

According to him, 0.7 percent of the budget for financing the MRT are not enough for normal functioning of the public service. “When you were in opposition you didn’t mind to support the proposal 1 percent of the budget to go for the public service, and now you propose 0.7 percent of the budget. If MRT has a debt of 30 million euro, then how do you plan with 15 million euro to service those debts. How do you plan to open a new channel on Albanian language, to equip the MRT, to raise the salaries, and I don’t wanna mention the process of digitization”, Selmani said.

Minister Robert Popovski promised that Article 61 will be deleted if journalists’ associations demand it. “We are opened to delete Article 61, but consider what it will mean”, Popovski noted.

As for the financing of MRT, Popovski said that they are thinking to find a solution that will increase the percentage of the budget each year for financing the MRT until it reaches the desired one percent.

Selmani, at the end of the debate, saluted the readiness of the Government to delete the fines from the Article 61 and to discuss for a compromise solution for the financing of MRT.

AJK launched report on media freedom and journalists’ safety

0

PRISTINA, 20.11.2017 – Association of Journalists of Kosovo launched on Monday the second edition of the report on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety.

The report is a continuation of the last year’s base-line assessment, which presented in more details the legislative situation and socio-economic and political issues related to media freedom and journalists’ safety.

The report is divided into three groups of indicators including: Legal protection of media and journalists’ freedoms, Journalists’ position in the newsrooms, professional ethics and level of censorship, and journalists’ safety.

In the first group of indicators, AJK stressed the failed attempt of previous government of Kosovo to recriminalize libel and defamation through the amendments of the Criminal Code of Kosovo. The sponsor of such amendment, the ministry of Justice removed such proposals after reactions from the association and civil societies in general.

The report states again that journalist’ continue to work under unfavourable conditions due to absence or the low and unpaid wages. The difficult economic situation in the country has also affected the media, whose sole source of income is marketing.

The third group of indicators – journalists’ safety – there has been some improvements related to new mechanisms created by justice and security institutions in the country. Though, the main challenge remains ahead when impunity is in question. Within the reporting period, AJK registered 11 cases of threats and attacks against journalists and none of the cases has been brought in front of court. Although, Basic Court in Pristina treated two cases (2014 and 2016) and the accused were sentenced to fines 300 and 500 euro respectively. Otherwise, from January until today, AJK registered 18 cases of threats and attacks against journalists. Kosovo police stated to have registered 24 cases of threats against journalists but AJK understands that some cases are not related directly to the work of journalists and some journalists decided not to make public their cases.

At the launch of the report, there were present head of OSCE mission in Kosovo, Jan Braathu who encouraged AJK and other media professionals to remain together in protection against the attacks against journalists. He also added: “The right to access to information is a powerful tool.”

Kosovo’s Chief Prosecutor, Aleksander Lumezi stated that prosecution will continue to work closely with journalists related to the cases of threats and attacks. “Media and justice should be joint partners in the fight against corruption and settle law and order, therefore fair trials and reporting have main role in international arena,” Lumezi said.

Riccardo Serri from the EU office in Kosovo, deputy general of Kosovo police, Naim Rexha, and Arben Hoti, vice president of the Basic Court in Pristina also attended the conference in Pristina.

Less freedom for journalists

0

PODGORICA, 20/11/2017 – More than half Montenegrin journalists believe that their economic situation has worsened considerably in the past year, and only 6% that it has significantly improved, showed the second research “Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety” conducted by the Trade Union of Media of Montenegro (SMCG).

SMCG representatives also expressed solidarity with RTV Pljevlja employees who have been on strike since November 17 due to five unpaid earnings.

Presenting a survey in Podgorica, one of the authors, Marijana Camović, SMCG President, pointed out that survey, which was conducted for the purposes of the research, showed that earnings of journalists are still below the average salary at the state level and that more than half of the respondents (54.7 %) receives less than €500. According to Monstat, the number of media employees in 2016 increased for 130.

“Eleven leading media, according to data provided by directors, have employed only 39 persons, so it remains unclear how Monstat came to this number”, Camović said.

Camović also presented data on cases of attacks on journalists. From September 2016 until mid-July 2017, seven incidents have been recorded by the Police Directorate. It is symptomatic is that most of them are classified as misdemeanors.

SMCG President reiterated that the state does not react adequately to cases of violence against journalists and that the prosecution and the police act inefficiently. However, ineffective investigation is not the only problem but also a lack of responsibility because there is no political will to deal with cases of attacks on journalists.

Author of the research Bojana Laković said that poor economic position of journalists in Montenegro is reflected the best in the fact that even 31.3% of respondents are forced to work another paid job, which is a 13% growth compared to the previous year.

Laković presented also that almost 8% of journalists have a status of honorary associate, while approx. 11% of respondents are working under fixed term contract. Also, more than half of respondents claim that their economic situation worsened even comparing to the previous year.

“In addition to economic ones, journalists in their everyday work also face problems regarding their professional status in newsrooms. More and more of them are overburdened, especially due to persistent demands to cover more areas and perform other tasks”, pointed out Laković.

The research has also shown that pressures to create sensational news are increasing. Laković said that in some media journalists face self-censorship in terms of being aware which topics they can cover and who are interlocutors preferred by their editorial.

What is new is increased influence of media owners on the work of journalists and also findings that some politicians and businessmen are in privileged positions due to close relations with managements of some media.

Representative of the EU Delegation to Montenegro Patrick Schmelzer said that in its 2016 report the European Commission noted that Montenegro made no progress in the area of media freedom. “This report presented today is a valuable source to us. I want to stress however that this is the report of Trade Union of Media of Montenegro which is EU funded but it is not the report of the European Commission”, said  Schmelzer, pointing out that the content of the report is sole responsibility of SMCG.

SMCG Vice President Radomir Kračković said that in some segments media situation worsened and one of the most severe examples happened several days ago, when colleagues from Pljevlja Radio-Television went on strike because of five unpaid earnings.

“Local self-government in Pljevlja for some time now has neglecting attitude toward employees, among which are also married couples, of that media. All other municipal employees as well as employees in public companies receive regular salaries, money lacks only for RTV Pljevlja.

The irony is that today is the Day of Pljevlja municipality, so we ask Mirko Đačić, the President of the municipality as well as other municipal officials how they can unworriedly celebrate when their 30 citizens, from RTV Pljevlja, live on the edge of existence for months? We express our full solidarity with them and we invite the authorities to finally resolve this issue because it is time to stop this practice” said Kračković.

Research is part of the project “Regional platform for advocating media freedom and journalists’ safety” which is implemented by SMCG and five journalists associations from the region.

DEMANDS OF THE GROUP FOR MEDIA FREEDOM

0

BELGRADE, 20.11.2017. – Demands of the Group for Media Freedom as presented to Serbian PM Ms Ana Brnabic, on Nov. 14th 2017 in Belgrade.

Considering that media freedom in Serbia is seriously threatened by political, economic, social, administrative, judicial and physical pressures to media and journalists;

Considering continuous discrediting and discrimination of media and journalists who uphold the professional and ethical standards and work in the interest of the public and the citizens;

Considering the non-implementation of the laws in area of public information and violation of professional and ethical norms;

Considering the non-efficiency of state institutions in protecting journalists’ safety and freedom of media, some of them even endangering the rights of media and journalists;

Consideringthat theconstant aggravation of the situation in the area of the media freedom is jeopardising the democratic processes in the society, media pluralism, right to dialogue about any important political and social matter;

Press and media associations, journalists, media, civil society organisations and citizens gathered in an informal Group for Media Freedom are demanding the following from the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia:

  1. The government representatives, first and foremost high state officials, to cease with public provocations and the attempts to discredit journalists and the media. The Government, ministries, its members and representatives of other state institutions, when inviting media to public events, to respond to journalists’ questions and media requests for interviews and statements, and to equally, without selection and discrimination, treat all media which respect the Code of Journalists of Serbia;
  1. The responsible authorities to urgently resolve all attacks on journalists and threats to their safety and to institute proceedings against the perpetrators. To urgently implement and announce the results of analysis of previous police and prosecution activities in cases of murders of journalists and attacks on them;
  1. The Ministry of Culture and Information to immediately suspend the work on the new Strategy for the Development of the Public Information System (Media strategy), due to the inappropriate methodology and structure of the Working Group members, which prevented the fundamental influence of representatives of major journalists’ and media associations on drafting this principal document. After the withdrawal of four members from the Working Group, it has lost the necessary legitimacy. The Ministry of Culture and Information, in a dialogue with the representatives of the media community and the civil sector, to establish a different work methodology and structure of the new working group as soon as possible, so that the Strategy for the Development of the Public Information System would be in the best interest of journalist profession, media, their outlets and citizens;
  1. The National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia to activate the dismissal procedure of the members of the REM (Regulatory Authority for Electronic Media) Council, and upon the election of new members of the Council, to amend the Broadcast Law so as to remove the possibility for the executive and legislative authorities to exercise the influence on the choice of other candidates. It is neither the responsibility of the Culture and Information Committee of the National Assembly to question the eligibility of members elected by the authorised proposers, nor of the Assembly to refuse to state its position on proposals for the election of the REM Council members. The amendments to the Broadcast Law should define the criteria for election of the Council members so as to ensure that the candidates are professionals with proven work experience and indisputable moral credibility. With these amendments to the Law,the political institutions would be excluded from the group of authorised proposers;
  1. To consistently implement the laws related to the privatisation of media process, to determine the non-state ownership in Politika, Vecernje novosti and Dnevnik and to finalize the state withdrawal from the ownership in these media establishments, as well as to urgently annul the Public Company Tanjug entry the Business Register, to remove Tanjug services from the Media Register and to close the agency’s activity, based on the Decision of the Government of Serbia of 3 November 2015;
  1. To ensure editorial, operational and financial independence of the Public Broadcast Services as guaranteed by law. With a view to protect their editorial independence, the Government of Serbia to enable Public Broadcast Services to be dominantly financed by broadcast tax, as stipulated by the law;
  1. The Ministry of Culture and Information, Commission for State Aid Control, State Audit Institution, Commission for the Protection of Competition, Public Procurement Administration and Anti-Corruption Council, within their respective competences, to continuously implement supervision and control of spending public funds through open calls for proposals and co-financing of projects in public interest, by public procurements for provision of media services, and via sponsorships and donations from public revenues;
  1. The Government of Serbia to establish an independent committee in charge of analysing the system of co-financing media content in the public interest and to propose the measures for preventing the misuse at all levels of this legally stipulated procedure.The Ministry of Culture and Information, through legislative amendments, to specify the requirements and criteria of decision-making in open calls and competitions for co-financing media content,and to introduce an effective mechanism for lodging complaints against the decisions on allocation of funds prior to their spending;
  1. The Government of Serbia to improve the working status of full-time journalists through strict implementation of the provisions of the Labour Law, also in the parts referring to the respect of labour rights and grounds for other legal work engagement (part-time, outsourcing, copyright contracts etc.), as well as implementation of the Law on Prevention of Mobbing.
  1. The Government of Serbia to ensure the enforcement of the ignored decisions of the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, to act upon all delayed requests for access to information and to treat such requests in the future within the legally prescribed deadline, in a manner stipulated by the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance.
  1. The Government of Serbia to comprehensively and consistently regulate the advertising of state authorities and other government bodies, through amendments to the Law on Public Procurements or adoption of the Law on Public Authorities Advertising.
  1. The Ministry of Justice to establish an independent committee for preparing records and analysing court procedures against media outlets, editors and journalists, in accordance with the practice of the European Court for Human Rights. We request consistent respect for the copyrights in media and an amendment of the Law on Copyrights that would prevent financial pressure being exercised on media outlets through judgments introducing excessive fines for violation of copyrights, also in accordance with the practice of the European Court for Human Rights.
  1. The Government of Serbia to adopt additional stimulating measures and incentives for the regional and local media across Serbia, as listed in the previous Strategy for the Development of the Public Information System in the Republic of Serbia, but none of which has ever been implemented, and to take into consideration the possibility of establishing the obligatory percentage of local self-governments’ budget allocations for co-financing of the media content in public interest.