Home Blog Page 381

CJA welcomes taking into custody person who threatened journalist Nataša Božić Šarić and points to threats against columnist Jurica Pavičić

0

ZAGREB, 15.12.2017. – Croatian Journalists’ Association (CJA) welcomes quick police reaction that resulted in taking into custody a person who sent offences and death threat by social networks to Nataša Božić Šarić, N1 TV journalist. Threats were sent after the TV show „TNT“, edited and hosted by our colleague. The topic was the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) sentence for Croatian general Slobodan Praljak, who committed suicide in the Court, and discussion bout should he be deprived of his medals.

CJA expects criminal charges to be filed against the perpetrator and that he will be adequately punished.

We also strongly condemn series of threats, death threats included, against Jutarnji list columnist Jurica Pavičić after his article dealing with moment of silence in memory of general Praljak in the Croatian Parliament. We expect prompt reaction of the police as threats have been reported.

That is already 41st attack against journalists in four years including death threats, physical violence and even attempted murder. Legal procedures have been finalized just in some cases and sentences were suspended.

We will inform international organizations about this latest Jurica Pavičić case – freedom of expression is basic human right protected even in EU documents, and therefor additionally protected, especially in media context.

We call for the police, State Attorney and courts to be efficient and we remind politicians that their ignoring attacks against journalists is inadmissible and dangerous.

Novinari: Premijerka ne odgovara na naše zahteve

0

BEOGRAD, 15.12.2017. – Grupa za slobodu medija osudila je to što premijerka Ana Brnabić ni nakon više od mesec dana nije odgovorila na 13 zahteva za poboljšanje medijske situacije u Srbiji, iako se javno obavezala da će to učiniti u roku od dve nedelje posle sastanka 14. novembra, na kojem su joj predati zahtevi.

“Činjenicu da premijerka Brnabić nije održala reč, Grupa za slobodu medija tumači kao njeno odbijanje da prizna postojanje velikih problema u medijskoj sferi, pa time i kao odsustvo političke volje da se oni rešavaju istinskim dijalogom sa novinarskom strukom. Ignorisanje Grupe, čiji su predstavnici, za razliku od premijerke i pojedinih ministara, u proteklih mesec dana pokazali maksimalnu uzdržanost i poštovali dogovor da se započeti dijalog javno ne komentariše dok Vlada ne odgovori na postavljene zahteve, upućuje na zaključak da je i sam poziv na sastanak bio neiskren”, navodi se u saopštenju.

Grupa za slobodu medija je navela da neće učestvovati u stvaranju privida da je počelo rešavanje problema novinarske profesije i medijske industrije, niti davati legitimitet nastojanjima Vlade da u domaćoj i medjunarodnoj javnosti stvori sliku o dijalogu sa medijskom zajednicom.

“Novinarska i medijska udruženja okupljena u Grupi za slobodu medija, neće priznati nijednu verziju Medijske strategije u čijoj izradi suštinski i bez ograničenja nisu učestvovali i njeni predstavnici i zadržavaju pravo da u javnosti vode aktivnu kampanju protiv nametanja ovog dokumenta. Grupa za slobodu medija smatra da odbijanje krivičnih prijava za napad na novinare prilikom inauguracije predsednika Srbije obesmišljava dalji rad predstavnika novinarskih i medijskih udruženja u Stalnoj radnoj grupi za bezbednost novinara i ponovo protestuje što, uprkos blagovremenom zahtevu, nisu bili pozvani na sastanak sa republičkom tužiteljkom Zagorkom Dolovac”, dodaje se u saopštenju.

Dodaje se da se “manipulativnim i površnim” svođenjem problema na polarizaciju medijske sfere i neutemeljenim ocenama da u Srbiji nema objektivnih novinara ne može prikriti činjenica da vlasti ne vide medije kao deo demokratskog procesa, već “kao sredstvo za ostvarivanje sopstvenih interesa i borbu protiv neistomišljenika”.

“Grupa za slobodu medija smatra da bez slobodnog, profesionalnog i odgovornog novinarstva i uređenog medijskog tržišta, koji su lišeni političkih i finansijskih uticaja i pristisaka, nije moguće ostvarivanje javnog interesa, jačanje demokratskog poretka, niti uspostavljanje održive stabilnosti u društvu. Sve dok nadležni državni organi i institucije budu suzbijali i ograničavali slobodu medija i slobodu izražavanja i zanemarivali političke, finansijske i normativne probleme medijske scene, na koje se upozorava i u izveštajima Evropske unije, Grupa će organizovati protestne akcije i tražiti podršku javnosti za ostvarivanje svojih zahteva”, navodi se u saopštenju.

Predstavnici Grupe za slobodu medija predali su 14. novembra premijerki Ani Brnabić zahteve za poboljšanje medijske situacije, među kojima su formiranje nove radne grupe za izradu Medijske strategije, rasvetljavanje svih napada na novinare, kao i povlačenje država iz vlasništva u Politici, Večernjim novostima i Dnevniku i prestanak rada agencije Tanjug, ugašene Vladinom odlukom pre više od dve godine.

Ties between politicians and media: Those indecisive shall bear the burden

0

SARAJEVO, 15.12.2017.-Many congratulating messages (coming from political offices and cabinets) emerged on the Day of Media Freedoms just in the period of vast hypocrisy in Bosna and Herzegovina, at the beginning of May 2017, followed by hypocritical congratulating messages for the Labor Day as well. It has become clear to everyone familiar with (BH) politicians and their deeds that those blank and rather empty congratulating messages, derived from the pens of those working in public relations offices, were tailored in accordance with mere schedule framed in certain wishes that had vanished years ago.

There were even brassy ones that, in their attempt to appear somehow differently, sent messages to journalists that “with- out responsibility, freedom / liberty may become anarchy”. This statement, as part of congratulating or greeting message, unintentionally and unconditionally, hidden the true message that many journalists in BiH (at least those that cared about journalism and society in general) had been forwarding to Bosnian political leaders and that should serve as general warning for the entire society. Freedom / liberty of those having contact with governing authorities and thrones, and to be clear there are many of those in BiH, is indeed equal to anarchy, since they bear no responsibility whatsoever nor they feel obliged in reporting to general public and during this rather imperious freedom, they often tend to oppress other forms of freedoms / liberties as well. Media freedom / liberty, being subject to many public congratulations and greeting are no exception in this particular “process”.

Who and how one shall sail Every time when younger colleagues, that is, those willing to hear what we “more experienced” would have to say, but also those (more experienced) willing to hear what “less experienced„ colleagues would also have to say, raise a question if independent journalism does exist in reality, I often reply by pointing out that independent journalism does not exist in reality, however, an independent journalist does exist. Let us stop pretending and glorifying journalism as an occupation, bearing in mind that almost everything in the world has been devalued and degraded, and journalism is no exception here.

However, a complete independence in journalism has vanished. Media shall always appear as a raft floating in unstable wavy water in order to prevail and survive, thus keeping alive people working on it as well. This should therefore display a mutual sustainability process and according to these rules, as long as there are no “weltering and rippling” journalists, the floating of the raft shall be more simple and stable.

While the fact that marketing vastly “controls the float” and it defines the stories that shall be subject to posting, can be justified on one hand, particularly on internet web sites where fast –growing and everlasting updating and speed; on the other hand, the congratulating mass from the beginning of this story determine who shall float and as they control the guiding of the float as well. It’s no secret that politics and politicians lead the role in guiding this particular branch in Bosnia and Herzegovina, including internet- based journalism as its disordered area, As a result, and as in many countless and disordered and unsettled fields, lawmakers prefer to keep these fields disordered and unsettled since it would allow them to manipulate and expose their mantras and finally, but equally important, it would provide them with the possibility of disposing of public money.

In other words, they would proceed with money laundry through ads on internet web sites. Laundry Platform Today in BiH most municipalities have, more or less, their own internet web sites. Besides, every municipality has at least two web sites posting local news of various qualities. This represents a Laundry Platform. Namely, no one can make such internet web site to post information regarding the ownership, names being involved in editing office operations or associated details.

Everyone knows that, in most cases, local political party activists or merely someone unable to exist in a different manner, have been assigned to perform certain duties for some salary or monthly wages, edit and manage the page that may benefit the governing authority officials. Simultaneously, governing official authorities shall make sure that marketing is being provided on such web site and this shall fulfill the needs of those that “fill in” the site, while others should be satisfied with what is left. No one is quite certain why and how such prosperous and wealthy public enterprises ended with banners posted on two sites only with almost no visitors there.

No one has, unfortunately, taken this issue into serious consideration although it was clear that political party links and ties with the ministry that was in charge with this particular company have been more important that the quality and visiting figures on these web sites. No one even dared to ask (and is not likely to do so) how much money ended up in pockets of people working with the ministry. Stories about responsibilities, fines and money returning indeed seemed as fairy tales. Local web sites certainly find easier to float in such sea, because local governing authorities dejure remain in power several consecutive mandates.

Consequently, local municipal budget disposal of money includes money allocation to local media houses and it often concludes with certain local media house receiving municipal budget – based funds and financial means, without prior checking or control of this media house and this amount increases accordingly, following the official commencement of election campaign. Undefined and indecisive web sites may consider themselves lucky only while the big fishes sit in big armchairs thus creating a situation where everybody is cheering up during public and religious holidays and when enormous amount of money is spent on greeting cards.

As a result, certain journalists feel satisfaction by being involved in particular projects (if they could even be considered as professional journalists in the first place), but this occurrence also “withdraws” the money through overestimated adds. Public enterprises once again, seek their loyal men, but also seek those that eventually may become biased and take sides based on six – months of annual contracts as a reward. Finally, those that do not deserve to be selected, in terms of quality contents and number of visits, do get selected instead. Politics always requires couriers Ties between the politicians and media houses are not specific for BiH market only. Political brainwashing in the world is based on this ties and the thing is that this washing is more transparent if it occurred outside BiH.

Politics always requires its couriers and it shall continue seeking and recruiting them. It is the very same message that has been floating over Bosnian public heads for decades which allows media houses to play media games, just as politics often plays the game of politics, Anyone supporting eulogies about powerful persons can be found almost anywhere and can be bought off for certain amount of money. It then becomes clear that a powerful person by having this kind of support, gains yet another link in his / her chain of power, since he / she may turn the water tap off, that is cut off money payments for some journalism projects at any time he / she wants.

However, on the other hand, one should be aware that there are other samples and cases as well regarding this issue. There are media houses that do not want to release and publicly reveal details regarding the ownership structure in their houses, which consequently provides them with some kind of protection from outer political influences. Anyone following the media situation in BiH should be aware that one could find out and discover, even with no impressum, who is hiding behind whose butt and whose wallet and also, who is capable of breaking stereotypes highlighting the fact that no success can be achieved unless one is someone’s puppet. When money, not deriving from a political party funds is being dispersed, there are however clear rules about its “distribution”. Namely, the money shall be distributed to those that most deserve it according to their numbers, work and actualities, including marketing people and more intelligent brain washers from wannabe politicians on the other hand. They simply want their advertisements to be shown to largest number of people. If you can manage to attract largest number of people by your work; then there shall be no problem regarding this issue. If not, you shall be lying to yourself and lying to them that you indeed have been on the right path and would thus have to wait for mercy by money givers. They prefer that the advertisement they manage to “handle” is less seen which would additionally allow them to take the money and hold a platform through which they perform with the money laundry process.

Finally, they would feel more relaxed bearing in mind that those on the float shall not “vibrate” and would appear stable as well. — Public enterprises once again, seek their loyal men, but also seek those that eventually may become biased and take sides based on six – months of annual contracts as a reward. Finally, those that do not deserve to be selected, in terms of quality contents and number of visits, do get selected instead. 7 e journalist Apart from the fact than every program broadcasted by any RTV Station should be based on the respect of professional and commonly – accepted values and ethic standards righteous and unbiased, he, above all, cannot tendentiously promote interests of a single political party or any group or an individual.

This text is a part of E-Bulletin– second edition of special serial of BHN online bulletin implemented through the “Media and Public Reputation” (origin. “Mediji i javni ugled”) project, also representing a contribution to public debate regarding the transparency of media ownership and upholding and encouraging the passing of set of laws aimed to advance media field and information market in BiH. 

AJK condemns the threats against journalist Agim Ademi

0

PRISTINA, 15/12/2017 – Association of Journalists of Kosovo is informed from its member Agim Ademi, correspondent of daily Koha Ditore that feels threatened and blackmailed by the citizen Naim Gashi, because of his articles related to a trial.

Ademi said that it’s been a while that Gashi has made pressures against him because of stories related to him.

The last pressure comes after the article was published in Koha Ditore which was about a decision from the Basic Court in Pristina that ordered Naim Gashi to appear at Dubrava prison for his sentence of nine months.

“Why are you writing about me, why was the story about court’s order? Now I will do my job,” Gashi told journalist on December 9th, 2017, said Ademi.

This is unacceptable for AJK and we ask for quick investigation on the matter as well as undertake necessary measures according to the law.

Uhapšen zbog pretnji Sejdinoviću i Gruhonjiću

0

BEOGRAD, 14.12.2017. – Policija je uhapsila T.L. (1988) osumnjičenog da je na “Jutjubu” i preko društvene mreže “Fejsbuk” pretio predsedniku Nezavisnog društva novinara Vojvodine Nedimu Sejdinoviću i članu izvršnog odbora te organizacije novinaru Dinku Gruhonjiću, saopštio je Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova.

T.L. se sumnjiči da je objavio video–snimak na “Jutjubu” u kome je uputio pretnje Sejdinoviću i Gruhonjiću, a potom na “Fejsbuku” u dva komentara pretio Gruhonjiću.

Zbog postojanja osnova sumnje da je počinio krivična dela ugrožavanje sigurnosti, povreda ugleda zbog rasne, verske, nacionalne ili druge pripadnosti i krivično delo rasna i druga diskriminacija, osumnjičemnom je određeno zadržavanje do 48 sati i on će uz krivičnu prijavu biti priveden nadležnom tužilaštvu, dodaje se u saopštenju.

Exclusively: Head of the US Kosovo Diplomatic Observer Mission, Shaun Byrnes – I searched for Perenic and Slavuj in vain

0

BELGRADE, 14.12.2017. – When we visited the field, we came into contact with the KLA soldiers, and through them, with their commanders. We always asked them about the missing Radio Pristina crew, but we never got a satisfactory answer – testifies in an exclusive interview with the Journalists’ Association of Serbia (UNS), Shaun Byrnes, former head of the US Kosovo Diplomatic Observer Mission (KDOM).

He points out that “Fatmir Limaj seems to have the most influence” in 1998 in the region where Ranko Perenić and Đuro Slavuj were kidnapped.

– But that part overlapped with the influence of the KLA from the Pastrik zone that was concentrated in Prizren. Also, the units under the control of Ramush Haradinaj came to this location, whose dominant zones of influence were Pec, Decani and Junik, so you did not know who you are dealing with, and who really has the power. After the October 1998 agreement, I was meeting with senior KLA leaders twice a month, and I initiated this topic, particularly in conversation with Jakub Krasniqi, Ram Buja and Sokol Bashota. They routinely answered that they did not know anything, that they would investigate, check with the commanders. I do not know if they did, but we did not get any information – explains Byrnes for the UNS Dossier.

Be very careful

About the research conducted by the Journalists’ Association of Serbia, Shaun Byrnes says that the kidnapping of the Radio Pristina team is something that could potentially be a war crime, that is, it belongs to the jurisdiction of the Special Court on War Crimes in Kosovo.

– Be very careful. War crimes are merciless, and people who committed them do not want to spend 20 years in prison. They have already killed people who are potential witnesses, and they will not welcome further investigations.

An Albanian who offered help got killed

Asked about the circumstances under which he learned that Radio Pristina’s team had disappeared on August 21, 1998, while carrying out a task, the former US diplomat said that the US embassy from Belgrade had contacted them, and that the Serbian government was probably asking them for help.

– I had good relationship with Veljko Odalovic, and even today I have great respect for his efforts to help Serbs and Albanians. I think he proposed a meeting with Snežana Perenić, Ranko’s wife. It was perfectly clear that she and her husband were normal, decent people who had good relations with neighbors, Serbs and Albanians, that they wanted to live in peace and raise their children. On one occasion, a friend of the Perenić family, a Kosovo Albanian who had some connections with the KLA people, offered to take him to the local KLA leaders to talk to them. He claimed he could help. We organized a meeting, but without results. After the war, when I returned to Kosovo, I learned that this Albanian was killed – adds Byrnes.

A former US diplomat who was also a witness at the Hague Tribunal for the UNS Dossier points out that he never heard that New York Times reporter Mike O’Connor saw a vehicle in which Perenic and Slavuj were kidnapped.

– This is the first time that I hear this story, and this make me a bit angry. I knew Mike very well, because my mission cooperated with the press. He never mentioned this event to me. I am sorry I did not know that.

I did not know about the “Yellow house”

While US diplomat Shaun Byrnes stayed in Kosovo, one journalist was murdered, and three journalists were kidnapped. In total, during and after the war, 14 journalists were kidnapped and murdered. International missions have failed to carry out an effective investigation, and killers and kidnappers are still at large.

As for the report by the Swiss Senator Dick Marty, Byrnes claims that he never heard of the “Yellow house.”

– Dick Marty’s report surprised me. I left Kosovo in August 1999, and I never heard rumors about a Yellow house or organ trade. But I was aware, as did the NATO commander Michael Jackson, representatives of other missions, and especially the British, that people were disappearing that summer, mostly in the region of Metohija. This was reported to us by the NATO troops, the Germans who were in Prizren, the Spaniards and the Italians in Pec, so we knew that something was happening. Our pretension was that it was a retribution. This violence was expected because it was a historical phenomenon and that there were attempts to prevent it. Marti’s report offers possible explanation, but I do not know if these things are true.

I am not an optimist

Noting that all families, regardless of their ethnicity, deserve to know the truth, Byrnes is not optimistic that Snežana will ever find out what exactly happened to her husband.

– It is clear to me that both of them died, but how did that happen, whether they were kidnapped in Velika Hoča and taken away, this can be only found out if someone who was in the KLA stepps forward and says that, but I doubt that this will happen. Another, very foggy possibility is that when the Special Court in The Hague conducts its own investigation, it could find some information. But this is farfetched, concludes the interlocutor of the UNS Dossier.

Support to the UNS

– Since June 1999, for both the United States and for the NATO, situation in Kosovo has been officially normalized. After that, Western media agencies withdrew, so there were no foreign journalists in Kosovo who would put pressure on our, but also diplomatic representatives of the Great Britain, France or Russia, international organizations, and especially UNMIK. They were not there to ask the questions you are asking. This means that the capitals in the West have been informed via the embassies, and the quality of those reports can vary.  And when a mission like UNMIK does not feel pressured by either the media or the member states, then the problem is put aside. It is important that the Journalists’ Association of Serbia speaks about this problem and put pressure on the international authorities – says Byrnes.

Brnabić nazvala KRIK „takozvanim istraživačkim medijem“

0

BEOGRAD, 14.12.2017. – Premijerka Srbije Ana Brnabić sinoć je gostujući na Radio-televiziji Srbije KRIK nazvala „takozvanim istraživačkim medijem“ i u negativnom kontekstu govorila o bazi imovine političara ističući da su novinari KRIK-a „kopali“ po imovini funkcionera. Izjavila je da je u interesu Vlade da se Zakon o poreklu imovine donese što pre kako novinari ne bi sami u skladu sa svojim željama i razmišljanjima određivali šta je bliža, a šta dalja porodica“.

„Moja imovina je u potpunosti transparentna i ja jedva čekam taj Zakon o imovini i mislim da je to posebno u interesu ove Vlade i ove vladajuće koalicije zato što mi u ovom trenutku imamo razne, takozvane istraživačke medije, koji kako god hoće, bez ikakve odgovornosti i bez ikoga da njih pozove na odgovornost, kopaju po imovini funkcionera“, izjavila je Brnabić gostujući u emisiji „Upitnik“na RTS-u.

Premijerka je navela da je „u potpunosti okej“ istraživati imovinu funkcionera, ali da ima problem kada mediji „sami u skladu sa svojim željama i razmišljanjima određuju šta je bliža, a šta dalja porodica“ i dalje istražuju.

„Ja apsolutno mislim da je Zakon o imovini nama najpotrebniji da bi stavili tačku na taj senzacionalizam i na to da vi danas u Srbiji možete da objavite imovinu koga god želite, zato što mislite da je na neki način povezan sa nekim funkcionerom“, nastavila je Brnabić. Navela je da ne zna zašto onda nije objavljena imovina njene najbolje prijateljice jer je možda i na nju prenela imovinu.

„Dobri rezultati nisu pali u senku“
Brnabić je izbegla pitanje novinarke Olivere Jovićević kako je slučaj ministra odbrane Aleksandra Vulina, koji je sa 200.000 evra nepoznatog porekla kupio stan u Beogradu, obeležio ovaj deo njenog mandata. Premijerka je, nakon što je ovo upitana, počela da govori o onome što smatra da je obeležilo njen mandat do sada – otvaranju Muzeja savremene umetnosti, završetku radova na Kliničkom centru Niš, izgradnji velikog energetskog postrojenja i povećanju plata i penzija.

U vezi sa navodima da je i dalje suštinska vlasnica firme „Energy & Innovation“ jer je udeo besplatno prenela svojoj partnerki Milici Đurđić neposredno pre nego što je postala ministarka, Brnabić je rekla da nije vlasnica i da ta firma ima samo jedan ugovor koji ne donosi više od 3.000 evra mesečno.

Podsetimo, KRIK je tokom istraživanja imovine političara otkrio da je Brnabić u julu 2015. godine  osnovala „Energy & Innovation“ sa kontroverznim beogradskim advokatom Igorom Isailovićem koji osniva ofšor firme i blizak je saradnik gradonačelnika Beograda Siniše Malog. Tri dana pre nego što je postala ministarka u avgustu 2016, Brnabić je svoj vlasnički deo besplatno prenela na Đurđić, koja je do tada bila direktorka firme.

Novinari KRIK-a otkrili su i da je Brnabić vlasnica 89 ari zemlje na hrvatskom ostrvu Krk, što se ne navodi u njenom imovinskom kartonu obajvljenom na sajtu Agencije za borbu protiv korupcije.

Osim toga, otkriveno je i da je u vlasništvu premijerkinog brata kuća u Grockoj koja je izgrađena bez dozvole i nije upisana u katastar.

Agencija za borbu protiv korupcije trenutno vodi postupak provere njene imovine.

Premijerkine izjave u kojima osuđuje novinare izazvale su reakcije javnosti.

Oglasio se, između ostalih, bivši Zaštitnik građana i lider Pokreta slobodnih građana Saša Janković koji je napisao na svom tviter profilu da se ovakvom opaskom o istraživačkim medijima otvara novi talas hajke na novinare.

Slaviša Lekić, predsednik Nezavisnog udruženja novinara Srbije (NUNS), ocenio je premijerkinu izjavu kao skandaloznu.

„Skandaloznu izjavu Brnabić o ‘takozvanim istraživačkim medijima’, koji, gle bezobrazluka, istražuju imovinu funkcionera, jedino amortizuje činjenica da je premijerka postala svestrana ličnost: jedno misli, a drugo govori“, rekao je Lekić agenciji Beta.

Podsećamo da je KRIK-ova baza imovine političara nagrađena međunarodnom nagradom „Daja jounalism award“ kao najbolja novinarska baza na svetu sastavljena od javno dostupnih podatka.

Pogledajte imovinu Ane Brnabić u bazi imovine političara

Research: Politicization and deep division have shaken confidence in the media

0

SKOPJE,14.12.2017 – Politicization and the deep division of the media sector have shattered the confidence of the citizens in the media, of which 66.3 percent believes that there is propaganda in the media, 57.9 percent say that in the media there is hate speech and 52.4 percent believe that media is corrupted. Sixty percent of citizens are convinced that media have no influence on their behavior, while half of the people think that media should only inform, and they should not offer solutions.

These were the findings of the survey “Citizens and Journalists on Professionalism in the Media” prepared within the project “Investigative Journalism Guardian of Democracy and Human Rights”, conducted by the Change Management Center and the Institute for Human Rights.

According to Goce Pachemski, one of the authors of the survey, 79 percent of the citizens believe that media can be a catalyst for changes in society.

Jasna Bacovska Nedic, co-author of the analysis, pointed out that Macedonia is a television society, where 47 percent of citizens are informed by television.

“Citizens are mostly informed by private televisions, and internet-portals that are increasing their influence more and more. The analysis showed that 86.5 percent of citizens have access to five or more televisions,” said Bachovska Nedic.

She pointed out that the analysis showed that journalists have the self-awareness for the crisis and the situation in the media where 71 percent of journalists think that their reputation is low, and a high percentage of 89 believes that they are corrupted. She said that, apart from this fact, 52.4 percent of citizens are convinced that there is corruption in the media.

Bachovska Nedic said that it is interesting that 76,6 percent of journalists believe that they are not specialized to make thematic and investigative journalism, while 92 percent of them said that journalists are not paid enough.

The survey is divided into two polls, the first was conducted between May 30 and June 9, 2017 on a representative sample of 1,203 citizens, while the second part from June 27 to July 10th on 163 journalists. The survey was conducted in Skopje, Bitola, Kichevo, Kumanovo and Tetovo.

Source: www.novamakedonija.com.mk

Osuda najnovijih prijetnji medijima i novinarima u Srbiji, Hrvatskoj i Bosni i Hercegovini

0

BEOGRAD, ZAGREB, SARAJEVO, 09.12.2017.-Regionalna platforma za zagovaranje medijskih sloboda i bezbjednosti novinara koja zastupa više od 7.800 članova, najoštrije osuđuje najnovije verbalne prijetnje upućene medijima i novinarima u Hrvatskoj, Srbiji i Bosni i Hercegovini.

Poslije teksta „Evo s kim trebamo živjeti: gnusne reakcije bošnjačke javnosti na smrt generala Praljka“, objavljenog na portalu Dnevnik.ba, brojne direktne prijetnje upućene su novinarima i medijskim ekspertima iz Bosne i Hercegovine. Prijetnje su upućene putem Fejsbuka i e-maila Selenu Kajanu novinaru Al Jazeera Balkans, Štefici Galić urednici portala Tačno.net, Arijani Sarajević Halać urednici Federalne televizije, Lejli Turčilo profesorki Fakulteta političkih nauka u Sarajevu i ostalima. Novinari su izvještavali i iznijeli svoja mišljenja o presudi Praljku i samoubistvu koje je izvršio u Haškom sudu. Njihova mišljenja citirana u tekstu, praćena su govorom mržnje i uvredama.

U Hrvatskoj su brojne prijetnje, uključujući i prijetnje smrću upućene novinarima i medijima zbog izvještavanja o presudi šestorici bosanskohercegovačkih Hrvata i samoubistvu generala Slobodana Praljka u sudnici Haškog suda. Glavna meta napada su bili novinari i mediji koji su u člancima isticali činjenicu da su optuženi, uključujući i generala Praljka, osuđeni za ratni zločin.

Ranije ove nedelje, novinarka televizije N1 Marija Antić u svojoj emisiji je ugostila Arnoa Gujona, koji pomaže Srbima na Kosovu, a kako bi razgovarali o njegovom humanitarnom angažovanju i o njegovom predavanju koje je trebalo da bude održano na Fakultetu političkih nauka. Novinarka je pitala Gujona o njegovom prethodnom angažmanu u “Les Identitaires”, ekstremno desničarskoj organizaciji u Francuskoj, kojoj se pridružio nakon što je organizacija “Unite radical”, u kojoj je bio aktivan, zabranjena 2002. godine. Ova pitanja izazvala su niz prijetnji smrću upućenih Mariji Antić i televiziji N1, uz podsjećanje da “spisak postoji” i da će doći vrijeme kada će se “plaćenički ološ koji koji sebe naziva “novinarima”, suočiti sa tim.

Tri različita verbalna napada desila su se u tri različite zemlje i Platforma to smatra veoma  zabrinjavajućim stanjem. Ovo govori puno o bezbjednosti novinara u zemljama  zapadnog Balkana i uopšte, slobodi govora.

Platforma će poslati pisma svim relevantnim institucijama u Hrvatskoj, Srbiji i Bosni i Hercegovini zahtijevajući od njih da spriječe bilo kakvu vrstu nasilja nad novinarima, da hitno i temeljno istraže sve činjenice o ovim i ostalim napadima i konačno da počnu da djeluju kada su u pitanju tri pomenuta slučaja. Na taj način će poslati snažnu poruku javnosti da takvo ponašanje nije prihvatljivo. Takođe, Platforma će prijaviti ovaj slučaj Platformi za promociju zaštite novinarstva i bezbjednosti novinara.

Napad na novinara je direktan napad na slobodu izražavanja i pravo građana da budu informisani. Svaki napad na novinare je napada na javni interes, demokratiju i prava svih građana.