Home Blog Page 453

State Department: Widespread corruption prevents progress in Western Balkans

0

WASHINGTON, 06.03.2017. – The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor of the U.S. has issued The Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2016.

These reports aim to provide policymakers with an accurate accounting of human rights conditions in nearly 200 countries and territories worldwide, including all member states of the United Nations and any country receiving U.S. foreign assistance. The reports cover internationally recognised individual civil, political, and worker rights.

ALBANIA

In Albania, the most important human rights problems were related to corruption in all branches of government, particularly in the judicial and health-care systems, but also in the field of media freedoms.

Widespread corruption, many forms of pressure and intimidation, combined with limited resources sometimes prevented the judiciary from functioning independently and efficiently. Moreover, persons holding high-ranking positions such as politicians, judges, and those with powerful business interests often were able to avoid prosecution.

Considering freedom of the media, Report estimates many issues such as violence and intimidation against members of the media. The government, business, and criminal groups sought to influence media in inappropriate ways. Furthermore, journalists often practised self-censorship to avoid violence and harassment and as a response to pressure from publishers and editors.

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Problems similar to ones in Albania were encountered in BiH in 2016. The biggest issue was considering state’s continued political and economic stagnation due to government corruption. As the report concludes, the problem with corruption lies with the multitude of state, entity, cantonal, and municipal administrations, where each has the power to establish laws and regulations affecting business, creating a system that lacks transparency and provides opportunities for corruption.

Some political leaders manipulated ethnic divisions, weakening democracy and governance as well as undermining the rule of law. Discrimination was fostered in most aspects of daily life, with with the emphasis on the underrepresentation of minorities in political life.

In the field of media freedoms, harassment and intimidation of journalists and civil society limited the public’s access to accurate information and the accountability of political leaders. The report notes the continuing tendency of politicians and other leaders to label unwanted criticism as hate speech or national treason. In addition to this, public broadcasters remained under strong pressure from government and political forces due to a lack of long-term financial stability and dependence on politically controlled funding sources.

CROATIA

In 2016, Croatia was facing the problem of discrimination. Social discrimination and instances of violence directed against members of ethnic minorities, including ethnic Serbs and Roma, women, and children were the main challenges. The surge in nationalism and political radicalization was detected. It severely impacted on the enjoyment of minority rights, particularly in those areas that were heavily affected by conflict.

In contrast to Albania and BiH, the media freedoms were in a relatively good state. Independent media were active and expressed without restraint a wide variety of views.

On a positive side, it was noted that the government took significant steps to prosecute and punish individuals who committed abuses of human rights.

KOSOVO

As for Kosovo, one of the most serious human rights problems was the occasionally violent obstruction of parliament by opposition deputies, who clearly stated that their intention was blocking free debate and the passage of legislation.

Government and private-sector corruption coupled with the lack of punishment for corrupt acts remained an important human rights problem. Although the law provides criminal penalties for corruption by officials, the government did not implement the law effectively. On top of that, lack of effective judicial oversight and general weakness in the rule of law significantly contributed to the problem.

The report suggests that media freedoms were violated. While the government generally respected media freedoms, credible reports persisted that some public officials, politicians, businesses, and radical religious groups sought to intimidate media representatives. Media also encountered difficulties in obtaining information from the government and public institutions as provided by law.

Interethnic tensions and real and perceived security concerns restricted freedom of movement.

Also, restrictions on religious freedom included the repeated vandalism of religious property and restrictions on freedom of worship for Serbian Orthodox pilgrims. In addition to that, security concerns limited the number of displaced Kosovo Serbs seeking to return.

MACEDONIA

The highlights of Macedonia’s problems in 2016 remained in the field of political crisis sparked by the 2015 wiretapping scandal. Extensive corruption and the government’s failure to respect completely the rule of law further deteriorated the state of democracy.

It was noted that the government continued putting pressure and restrict media freedoms. More specifically, Reporters Without Borders noted a decline in media freedom during the year, and since the government has traditionally been one of the largest purchasers of advertising in the country, many media outlets remained financially dependent on its spending and therefore subject to pressure to avoid criticising it.

The judiciary failed to demonstrate independence and impartiality. The outcomes of many judicial actions appeared predetermined, particularly in cases where the defendants held views or took actions in opposition to the government. With judges subject to political influence and corruption, political interference, inefficiency, favouritism toward well-placed persons, corruption in judiciary seems pervasive.

MONTENEGRO

The main issue considering the state of human rights in the Western Balkans has also prevailed in Montenegro. Corruption was among the country’s most significant human rights problems. It was present in health care, education, and other branches of government, including law enforcement agencies and the courts. The process of appointing judges and prosecutors remained somewhat politicised.

Media freedoms were endangered since the independent and pro-opposition media reportedly experienced political and economic pressure. They also reported alleged threats and attacks on the property of media representatives. As it was stated in the Report, many attacks from previous years remained unsolved or lacked court decisions.

Discrimination and violence against the members of ethnic minorities, especially Roma, Ashkali, Balkan Egyptians, Albanians, Bosniaks, as well as women, was present. Widespread discriminatory cultural norms prevented women from participating equally in all areas of social development.

SERBIA

The most serious human rights problems during the year included discrimination and societal violence against members of minority groups, especially Roma. Numerous observers noted the existence of a climate of hostility toward members of national and ethnic minorities. Also, discrimination with respect to employment and occupation was reported.

As for the media pressure, harassment of journalists and pressure on them was a significant problem. During the year some reporters and media organisations were the victims of vandalism, intimidation, and physical attacks. The concerning was the economic pressure which sometimes led media outlets to practice self-censorship. State-controlled funds were believed to contribute a significant percentage of overall advertising revenue, giving the state correspondingly strong leverage over media outlets.

An inefficient judicial system that caused lengthy and delayed trials as well as long periods of pretrial detention adversely affected citizens’ access to justice. The report adds that the courts remained susceptible to corruption and political influence. Despite the government saying that it is fighting the corruption, it still provides a lack of transparency.

Government Pays Debts of Electronic Media

0

PODGORICA, 06.03.2017. – The Government of Montenegro has decided to grant the request of the Broadcasting Center and pay the debts to all active broadcasters in the amount of EUR1.847.189,16, in the name of aid. The press release issued after the government’s session of 2nd March states that this decision was made because they recognized “very difficult operating conditions of all broadcasters in the Montenegrin media scene”.
It was explained that the money would be distributed for 36 monthly invoices, of all active broadcasters (13 local radio broadcasters, 31 commercial radio broadcasters, 3 local and 6 commercial TV broadcasters) that Broadcasting Center provides the service for. How much money will be allocated for the debts and which media will get that help, you can find here.
“Given the importance of media pluralism in Montenegro and with the aim of its encouraging, Broadcasting Center has repeatedly giving support to public, local and commercial broadcasters. In addition to approval of discounts, all broadcasters had been given the opportunity to pay 60 monthly installments of arrears. However, this type of obligation represented a great financial burden for them, and they were not able to regularly pay their regular invoices “, as said in the government statement.
In this year and during the next 4 years the government will approve the “assistance” from the Budget in settling the obligations pursuant to contracts concluded on the use of infrastructure and transmission systems that commercial and local radio and TV broadcasters have towards the Broadcasting Centre.
“To all users of the Broadcasting Center that did not pay their obligations regularly, the owed amount will be reduced by the amount of 36 monthly invoices issued in January 2017. In the event that the amount of the current balance is bigger than the amount of assistance from the Government, the Broadcasting Centre and the beneficiaries shall conclude an agreement on the manner of payment of the remaining debt for this and for the next 4 years. The financial help of the Governments and local commercial radio and TV broadcasters who duly comply with their contractual obligations, shall be treated as a subscription,” is stated in the explanation of the decision, noting that in this way transparency and equal treatment of all users of the Broadcasting Center is ensured.

16,000 seconds on TV Pink for SNS

0

NOVI SAD, 02.03.2017. – During the past month, Novi Sad School of Journalism monitored daily reporting in the primetime news program of RTS, RTV, TV Pink and TV N1.

When it comes to the length of the statements of the representative of the ruling parties and the opposition, the biggest balance was noticed on the TV N1 and the lowest on TV Pink, the announcement states.

According to the Novi Sad School of Journalism ” the representatives of the Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) on TV Pink spoke for almost 16,000 seconds or 260 minutes, i.e. in total nine National Dnevnik (National News programme). On February 17, three minutes and 46 seconds of applause to Aleksandar Vucic, without any accompanying verbal content, were broadcasted”

WB Platform calls journalists to boycott reporting from violent protests

0

SKOPJE, 01.03.2017. – The journalist associations of the Western Balkan region strongly condemn the attacks on the colleagues of A1.on from Skopje – the journalist and cameraman Alexander Todevski  and Vladimir Zhelchevski who were beaten last night by participants of the protest organized by the civil initiative “For mutual Macedonia”.

We expect from the Ministry of Interior of Macedonia to quickly identify the perpetrators and raise appropriate charges and sanctions against them.

Violence against journalists constitutes the most serious attack on freedom of media and denying the right of the public to be informed.

The policy of impunity for violence against journalists that the government is fostering in the last five years directly encourages such attacks.

We call on the leader of VMRO-DPMNE Nikola Gruevski, to publicly condemn yesterday’s attack on journalists and to call on his supporters, in this case the protesters, not to attack journalists.

As a sign of protest, because of the frequent attacks, we urge all journalists from Macedonia not to report from tonight’s protest of the initiative “For mutual Macedonia”.

In the future our position in respect to these events will depend on the readiness of the organizers of the protests and the Ministry of Interior to provide working conditions for journalists.

AJM calls journalists not to report from violent protests

0

SKOPJE 01.03.2017 Association of Journalists of Macedonia strongly condemns the attacks on the colleagues of A1.on, the journalist and cameraman Alexander Todevski Vladimir Zhelchevski who last night were beaten by participants of the protest organized by the civil initiative “For mutual Macedonia.

We expect, the Ministry of Interior to quickly identify the violators and to open investigation against them.
Violence against journalists constitutes the most serious attack on freedom of media and denying the right of the public to be informed.

The policy of impunity for violence against journalists that the government is fostering in the last five years directly encourages such attacks.

We call on the leader of VMRO-DPMNE Nikola Grevski, to publicly condemn yesterday’s attack on journalists and to call on his supporters, in this case the protests, not to attack journalists.

As a sign of protest, because of the frequent attacks, we urge all Journalists not to report from tonight’s protest of the initiative “For mutual Macedonia”. In the future our position in respect to these events will depend on the readiness of the organizers of the protests and the Ministry of Interior, to provide working conditions for journalists.”

Association of journalists of Macedonia

Skopje 01.03.2017

Foto by: TV Telma

Serbian Provincial TV Journalists Face Temporary Layoffs

0

NOVI SAD, 28.02.2017. – Over 190 journalists at the regional public broadcaster Radio-Television Vojvodina could be temporarily laid off after the management contracted a private agency to run its employment policy.

Maja Ledjenac, one of the 191 journalists at the TV station in Serbia’s northern province of Vojvodina, told BIRN on Tuesday that their positions were uncertain because their contracts could not be transferred from RTV to a private consortium on March 1 as previously envisaged.

RTV chose the consortium through a public procurement process, but its winning bid was challenged by another company over suspected irregularities in the process, which means that a state commission now has 20 days to decide whether the procurement bidding should be repeated or not.

In the meantime, the consortium cannot issue contracts for the journalists, who have been left in limbo. All of them are on short-term contracts which expired at the end of February.

“I’m not sure what will happen tomorrow because the contract between RTV and the agency couldn’t be concluded due to the request [for a review of the procurement bidding] that was filed which stopped the process,” said Ledjenac.

RTV announced on its website on February 14 that the winner of the tender was a consortium of bidders which includes the Optimum and Sequester Employment agencies.

BIRN reported in January that Sequester Employment had also been hired by the Serbian state electricity company EPS to read its meters at an unfavorable rate.

RTV journalists’ union representative Darko Sper alleged that the station was using a private company to get around a law restricting the number of people that can be employed in Serbia’s public sector.

He claimed that state broadcaster RTS got permission to hire 375 journalists last Friday, so RTV did not have to use an agency to get around the law.

He also said it was the first time that a public broadcaster had employed staff in this way, describing it as “leasing workers”.

The director of RTV, Miodrag Koprivica, was unavailable for comment.

Koprivica was appointed in July last year, after the ruling Serbian Progressive Party came to power in Vojvodina.

During the campaign and after the elections, many of RTV’s journalists were moved to other jobs or their contracts weren’t renewed.

The situation led to protests organized by the Support RTV movement which now monitors the station’s programming and informs the public about how it favours the ruling parties in Vojvodina.

Vučić novinarima: Došli ste iz Beograda da me ponižavate, neće vam uspeti

0

NIŠ, 25.02.2017. – Kada je u oktobru prošle godine Vlada Srbije boravila na jugu Srbije sedam dana, radnicima propalih niških giganata obećano je da će početi isplata njihovih zarada. 5 meseci kasnije novinari Istinomera i televizije N1 pitali su premijera zbog čega to obećanje nije ispunjeno, ali su pre odgovora opet dobili etikete stranih plaćenika koji se zalažu za interese „onih vaših“.

Na pitanje novinarke Istinomera zbog čega stalno etiketira i ponižava novinare koji se usude da mu postave pitanja, Vučić je odgovorio: „Vi mene ponižavate prekidanjem stalno, i želite da napravite slučaj. Došli ste iz Beograda da biste to uradili, neće vam to poći za rukom“.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_w5XYQ-87k

NUNS i NDNV: RTV nastavlja da ponižava novinare i građane

0

NOVI SAD, 24.02.2017. – Nezavisno udruženje novinara Srbije (NUNS) i Nezavisno društvo novinara Vojvodine (NDNV) upozoravaju da se na Radio-televiziji Vojvodine nastavljaju procesi koji ponižavaju i novinare, i novinarsku profesiju, i građane, a ova medijska kuća, ni posle nešto manje od deset meseci od raspisivanja konkursa, nema izabranog direktora programa i glavnog i odgovornog urednika.

Dok rezultati monitoringa pokazuju da se RTV nedvosmisleno pretvorio u instrument vladajuće političke garniture, koja je u informativnim emisijama zastupljena sa čak 89 procenata, ovaj javni medijski servis je još uvek u VD stanju zbog odugovlačenja sa izborom programskog direktora i glavnog i odgovornog urednika.

I pored činjenice da, iz nejasnih razloga, ne postoje definisani rokovi za izbor programskog direktora i glavnog i odgovornog urednika ni u Zakonu o javnim medijskim servisima, niti u tekstovima konkursa, NUNS i NDNV ukazuju da nedonošenje odluke o izboru u razumnom roku jeste u suprotnosti sa principima dobre uprave, načelima zakonitosti, celishodnosti i efikasnosti, zbog čega će naše dve organizacije predati pritužbu Zaštitniku građana.

Nakon političkih, postizbornih čistki na RTV-u u maju prošle godine, kada su smenjeni direktor programa i 14 urednika i novinara, RTV u međuvremenu nije produžio ugovor sa 22 honorarna saradnika, a dve novinarke su zbog cenzure dale otkaz.

Više od stotinu zaposlenih prošle godine je ostalo bez ugovora o radu na određeno, pa su potom tri meseca bili angažovani na lizing preko agencije za zapošljavanje, da bi potom u februaru bili angažovani kao honorarni saradnici.

RTV istovremeno se organizuju audicije za prijem novih “televizijskih lica”.

Nezavisno udruženje novinara Srbije
Nezavisno društvo novinara Vojvodine

The disclosure of information on state financing Tanjug would endanger the economic stability of the country?

0

BELGRADE, 24.02.2017. – The amount of public money paid to news agency Tanjug for a few months in 2016, for now, remains a mystery.  The response of the Treasury to this question concluded that the calculation is so complicated and difficult and would lead the entire country to a halt that it would have far-reaching consequences for the country’s economy.

Late last year, Istinomer portal requested the information from the Ministry of Finance Treasury about all direct and indirect budget users’ payments to the accounts of news agency Tanjug in the period May – October 2016 in order to determine whether Tanjug continues to survive thanks to the “state aid”. Just a few months earlier we had requested and received the data in the same manner. However, this time our request was rejected with a string, to put it mildly, problematic arguments.

In its response to the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance, to which Istinomer complained, the Treasury stated that search for such data in their databases could even jeopardize the country’s economy.

The response states that the execution of the Istinomer  request “having in mind its magnitude, complexity, structure and content, would jeopardize the technical processes and lead to (its)  inability to perform tasks related to the execution of the state budget, budget accounting and reporting, public payments and other duties of state finances, which would result in the fall of performance of the system,  lead to overload  of the system and jeopardise the security of information system of public finances management and result in the reduction of the country’s ability to manage the economic processes in the country.”

To repeat, Istinomer had sent exactly the same request in May 2016 and received the information without any problem – it seems that the Serbian economy in that time survived.

The Treasury quoted the article 13 of the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance, and concludes that Istinomer is abusing free access to information with this request.

Abuse of Free Access to Information of Public Importance

Article 13

A public authority shall not allow an applicant to exercise the right to access information of public importance if the applicant is abusing the rights to access information of public importance, in particular where a request is unreasonable, frequent, where an applicant repeatedly requires the same information or information already obtained, or when too much information is requested.

 

While Istinomer is abusing free access to information that should be public, the public does not know how is Tanjug financed, does it still receives funds from various ministries, public enterprises, and other budget users.

After complaints by Istinomer, the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance ordered the Ministry of Finance to provide us with the requested information within five days.

While we wait for answers, we cannot help but wonder how it is possible that the same institution responds differently to the same request, one time deliver data and next time doesn’t deliver. We cannot help but wonder whether only data about the “late” Tanjug – which by the Government’s decision should have been shut more than a year ago – is concealed, or this has become a standard practice, since more colleagues from Istinomer and other media asked the various data, but they have been denied information with a similar excuse.

And finally, we cannot help but wonder whether Serbian system is so fragile that it can collapse by just one ordinary request for free access to information of public importance.