Home Blog Page 359

Media in era of modern slavery

0

SARAJEVO, 22.01.2018.-It would indeed be encouraging if the issue of rights of the journalist in 21st Century would primarily be covered and analyzed in terms of the elimination of censorship and auto-censorship, including the incensement of free and liberated non biased reporting and associated fairy tales.

Unfortunately, until this dream becomes true, we must, in the first place, face painful facts, indicating that we are in fact at the very initial stage of the media development process. First of all, we have no information about basic facts and have no information regarding the fundamental statistical data such as; the number of journalists operating in BiH media market, number of media houses operating in BiH market as well, their (media houses) ownership structure (on who – owns – whom/what basis) and information about wages/salaries journalists (should) receive while performing their duties and doing their work.

We don’t know how journalists live nowadays, how many of them are engaged in more than one / single project, how much do freelancers earn, who amongst them receives tax – free money based on cash-in-hands payments and how many of them work on copyright contracts basis as well. What else don’t we know? Can journalists afford to receive proper medical treatment and to be hospitalized if necessary and how can this be done? Are they victims of mobbing methods imposed against them by their editors and media entrepreneurs? How many hours a week they have to work, do any of them receive overtime money, bonuses etc. How many journalists have to work over the holidays and do any of them receive extra bonuses for that? How many journalists have to work as photographers as well? How many reporting stories can they make per month and how many days off they have during a single month?

We don’t have precise answers to any of the above questions. Instead, we only have approximate and partial, but unreliable information concerning the insignificant number of journalists and how they work and live, while the majority of them struggle while being forced to work without contracts and associated rights, often being blackmailed and forced to work for modern slaveholders with no rights to have their own say. Establishing of vast number of media houses (apparently there are over 1100 media houses in BiH including around 1000 news-based websites), with minimum investing, links and ties between commercial and political interests, the growing and increasing ownership concentration, inferiority in technological terms have altogether resulted in the present situation concerning almost all journalists in BiH.

Furthermore, there has been no difference in terms of weather BiH journalists work for public broadcasting services and agencies or work for private media houses. Their treatment is practically the same regardless to weather their entrepreneurs are “public” (state-appointed) persons or some recent rich “businessmen”; either way their rights are denied often with mobbing included, their wages and salaries are miserable and not in paid in time, superannuation (pension and retirement funds) payments also almost do not exist and the quantity of duties they are assigned with is continually increasing. Based on all of the above-listed reasons and facts, one could conclude that present and current journalism in BiH has become a field of total exploitation of thousands of people working in one of the most stressful and most demanding areas and their say and their voices cannot be seen or heard nor they are “registered” as workers or employees.

Additionally, the fact that media entrepreneurs and their editors have access to unlimited number of students (which they may engage any time they like), unemployed journalists with degrees in journalism and graduates with similar and relevant social degrees knowing that almost all of them would be happy to write or make reports for symbolic amount of money, does indeed outline the current situation as far as journalism in BiH is concerned. Watching for an opportunity to prove themselves and get a proper job and work as journalists or public relations officers, journalists often spend an entire decade being engaged as underrated casual employees with absolutely no possibility to make career advancement whatsoever. Media disorder in BiH, unclear ownership structure of TV houses, radio stations and websites, political influences and pressures imposed against journalists, including the vast number of people that would accept to work for minimum amount of money in order to grab the opportunity to eventually become full time employees in few years time, have altogether resulted in a complete instability and uncertainty, as far as the journalists’ existence in BiH is concerned.

Considering the nature of their work, completely unrealistic deadlines they are forced to comply with and great, but unreal expectations from their editing offices; employees are, at the end of the month, left with paid money (which in fact is less then what low – profile workers and people with very limited educational background get paid on monthly basis) and they are consequently forced to use whatever time left they have to seek for additional work thus earning extra money elsewhere. Journalists work a lot more than they get paid, their wages and salaries are often not paid in time and they also receive partial payments. They are forced to look for additional work because they are economically ruined, blackmailed and left out with the very low level of self – confidence. They live very stressful lives; they are imposed with pressure at different levels, frustrated and fear for their jobs they dare not to even speak about their statuses and positions thus wasting significant time and years of their lives.

More absurdly, journalism is gradually turning into a female occupation in BiH and this accordingly produces economic and financial position female journalism employees are in actually displaying the reflection of the above-mentioned attitude and facts. The following, rather a legitimate question emerges accordingly: ”How come journalists are then not fighting for their own rights when they are aware of workers’ and labor rights of other workers in other fields (being heavily violated), about which journalists make regular reports?” One of the answers to this question may include the fact that they (journalists) have been blackmailed and disarmed (whilst spinning few coins in their rather empty pockets) being, at the same time overloaded with work they had been assigned with and deadlines that are always met just in time, journalists find very difficult to think thoroughly about their own (labor) rights. On the other hand, journalism, as an occupation, is not considered and generally treated as proper job at all, instead, it is generally treated as hobby and some kind of additional, extra or simply (part-time) job and anyone with talent in journalism is thus not considered as genuine journalist, instead he/she is generally and often publically treated and declared as public star.

Ironically speaking, one could not expect from journalists to make reports about their own (violated) rights, when there are other “priorities”’ to handle such as most teachers in BiH (including both primary and secondary schools), medical workers (including doctors, nurses, technicians and others) and other workers (various fields and branches) about whose rights journalists make reports on regular basis. Journalists are obviously more concerned about rights of others that about their own rights. Unfortunately, they become aware of their violated rights when it is already too late to regret and think about it; that is, they begin to think and are seriously concern about this whole issue when they get sacked, when they lose their jobs, jeopardize and endanger their good health (often losing both, job and good health), when they become parents, get children and when they begin to stress out about bank loan repayments they have to pay and so on. Media scene development in BiH is therefore based on the exploitation of employed journalists and other associated workers (staff) in the media field, with deliberate creation of chaos and imperative of political influence.

As a result, one could be taking into consideration the above mentioned chaotic conditions, speak about the commencement of media scene which should actually begin with its initial stage and shape its profile. This may actually occur only if we stop overstepping the stairs and begin with taking one step at the time: eventually, it may stop once we gather around and become massive in terms of numbers, just as workers in other fields do. Associations and Journalists’ Clubs, (unions/syndicates in particular), indeed represent perfect initial points to launch and begin the fight for gaining decent work/labor conditions for all journalists. The present state officials (considering their will to help) will certainly not take care of those that fail to take care about themselves, particularly they will definitely not express their concerns and take care about journalists, since they consider journalists as obstacles, rather than regular and decent workers.

This text is a part of E-Bulletin– third edition of special serial of BHN online bulletin implemented through the “Media and Public Reputation” (origin. “Mediji i javni ugled”) project, also representing a contribution to public debate regarding the transparency of media ownership and upholding and encouraging the passing of set of laws aimed to advance media field and information market in BiH. 

Instead of congratulations, we want to point to problems

0

PODGORICA, 22.01.2018 – Trade Union of Media of Montenegro (SMCG) will submit proposals for amendments to media laws on Tuesday, on the occasion of Day of Journalists of Montenegro, to all MPs in the Parliament of Montenegro, announced SMCG President, Marijana Camović.

Camović said that for the past five years, since SMCG marks January 23 – Day of Journalists of Montenegro, it persistently draws attention to the problems faced by media employees.

“We think that this is not a day when we should receive congratulations from the officials, but draw attention to media working conditions and encourage them to improve situation, from various angles”, said Camović.

We will do this, as she said, this year, asking MPs to amend the laws on the media and electronic media.

“SMCG presented in December the expert analysis of these two laws with specific recommendations that will be delivered on Tuesday to all those who make the current Parliament convocation,” said Camović.

As she explained, the proposals include, among other issues, the introduction of autonomy for journalists.

“We believe that texts and contributions cannot be essentially changed without author’s consent, and that is happening everyday. Whoever does that has to bear responsibility”, Camović said.

According to her, SMCG hopes that MPs will perceive the justification of these requests. According to SMCG, employees in Montenegrin media are still working for salaries that are below the national average.

Media laws and journalists: No rights and obligations are stipulated

0

PODGORICA, 21.01.2018 – Media laws in Montenegro, unlike those in the region, do not specifically regulate the position of journalists and their rights and obligations, nor do they provide any legal protection from the management structure and advertisers.

“Analysis of the position of local public broadcasters and journalists in media laws of Montenegro”, prepared by Prof. Sandra Bašić-Hrvatin, PhD and Goran Đurović, contains analysis of these rights, an overview of good practice in the countries of the European Union, and recommendations for improvement of regulations regarding protection of journalists’ rights.

The exception from this practice in national legislation presents only Article 14 of the Law on National Public Broadcaster Radio and Television of Montenegro (RTCG) which stipulates that: “Journalists employed in RTCG are independent in their work and act in the public interest. A journalist cannot be cancelled employment, reduced salary, or his/her status in the newsroom can be changed, or responsibility established for an attitude or opinion expressed in accordance with professional standards and program regulations.”

In addition to failure to stipulate basic rights and obligations, the regulations do not include mechanisms for protecting journalists/editors from the influence of media owners. So there is no obligation to sign an appropriate act by owner(s) and a journalist to ensure that owner(s) will not interfere with media content editing.

“This is combined with an uncertain financial position, low salaries, limited career advancements, so journalists and editors often accept influence of an ownership structure on media content editing. Generally, they are not willing to talk about their position and working conditions, and they decide to take this step only when they get fired”, states the Analysis.

Salaries of journalists are below the average salary on the state level, which, according to Monstat data, amounted to 510 Euros in June 2017, and those low salaries are in some cases late, which most often happens to employees in local public broadcasters and private media.

Non-payment of contributions, illegal employment, overtime and work during holidays are just some of the problems that media employees face. In addition to economic ones, journalists also face problems when dealing with their professional status in a newsroom. They are increasingly being overburdened, especially because of demands from a journalist to cover several areas. They are often tasked to do something that is not part of their job description, such as editing, lay-outing, taking photos, photo processing, etc.

“Journalists do not speak openly about pressures they face with in their daily work, but those ready to speak point out that each editorial board has a “list of desirable” interlocutors, and that journalists face self-censorship in terms of knowing which topics they can cover depending on the editorial media policy. Imposed interlocutors and topics limit journalists in their work, and interviewed journalists explain that “self-censorship exists when you have to choose a topic within the frameworks of the media where you work or – just do not “rock the boat” and you will not have major problems”, states the Analysis.

Examples of good practice include two former members of Yugoslavia, now members of the EU, – Croatia and Slovenia. Both countries recognise in their legislation the minimum standard of media statute which ensures certain level of journalistic autonomy in relation to an employer through participation in an election or dismissal of an editor-in-chief and through “conscience clause” which gives a journalist the possibility to reject, under certain conditions, editor’s or owner’s order without any material consequences.

Thus, the Statute, as a mechanism of protection of journalist autonomy, and a clause of conscience, as a mechanism for protecting those who warn of censorship, should be defined in the Law on Media along with mechanisms that guarantee their implementation. The minimum Statute standards and the clause to be defined within the Law also need to be aligned with the Labour Law in order to avoid legal uncertainties and arbitrary interpretations.

The Analysis notes that Slovenia and Croatia are among rare states that provide to their journalists such legal autonomy. International journalists associations consider these practices as the highest standards that need to be introduced into national legislations in order to protect media integrity. What is lacking in both legislations is the clear definition of effective measures for the implementation of these legal norms.

The Analysis provides remarks from the EU, which are well recognized in the media scenes of Montenegro and the region, that journalists are under increasing pressure from the so-called “soft censorship”, based on an invisible (at least for the public) links between the interests of media owners and politics (political instrumentalization of media), which result in limiting journalists in their work.

“When journalists have an uncertain labour-legal relations, when their economic and social security depends on the interests of advertisers and various formal and informal centers of power, it is hard to expect that they will be able to perform their work in the public interest. It is therefore, of high importance that professional journalists’ associations and journalists’ trade unions develop an efficient network of mechanisms for assistance and public warning to the problems that exist in journalism and to direct their activities to defining journalists work, within legislation, as the public interest. Media integrity (professional and personal commitment of journalists to the public interest) is the basic guarantor of freedom of expression”, states the Analysis.

In order to improve the legislation regarding protection of the rights of journalists, Bašić-Hrvatin and Đurović recommended that within Law on Media mechanisms for protecting the professional interests of journalists and editors in creating/editing media content should be prescribed, as well as to specify the right of the journalist to reject editor’s order under certain conditions.

It is also recommended that amendments to the Law on Media should be used to prescribe the obligation for media founders to cover the costs of court proceedings related to journalistic work (based on compliance with professional standards) and contributions made within his/her duties and based on the editor’s decision – lawsuits or civil lawsuits for journalistic work.

Representatives of the OSCE Missions to Bosnia and Herzegovina in a discussion with journalist from Zenica

0

SARAJEVO, 18.01.2018.-Local media are under economic, and often political pressure, says a journalists who participated in the conversation with representatives of the OSCE Mission in our country on the issue of strengthening the capacity of journalists.

It is necessary to educate journalists on protection mechanisms, ethical standards, the application of laws that regulate freedom of expression, as well as educating politicians about accountability towards citizens and their attitude towards the media, said Velida Kulenovic, journalist of the Radio FBiH and president of the BHN Club in Zenica.

The economic dependence of local media influences their work, and continuous education of journalists is necessary, as well as greater mutual solidarity, says the editor of TV Zenica Sinan Gluhic. During the conversation, the need for monitoring of court proceedings related to the application of the Law on Protection against Defamation was emphasized, while journalists Harun Bošnjak (BHT) and Adnan Džonlić (Zenicablog) spoke about the “slow” nature of the judicial authorities in cases of reporting and prosecution attacks on journalists. According to Mirsad Bajtarevic, journalist BHR1, professional and fair reporting, as well as the application of laws regulating freedom of expression, are important for the work of journalists.

There was also a talk about the election period and pressures that media and journalists were exposed at that time, so Enes Begičević, a journalist at FENA, stressed the need to educate politicians in relation to the media and journalists, especially in the election period.
It was also discussed the transparency of spending of funds for the media from the budget, reports of attacks on journalists and education of young journalists.

The OSCE Mission will continue activities related to working with journalists, told Anja-Leyli Hessarbani ahead of the OSCE mission. “The aim of today’s meeting was to get acquainted with the state of the media and the needs of journalists in Zenica. The OSCE Mission recognizes the importance of local media in timely reporting, and that’s why we will continue to work with journalists in order to make the journalists work better,” added Hessarbani.

International media freedom delegation in Croatia: some improvements, old and new issues

0

ZAGREB, 18.01.2018. – After the fact-finding mission in June 2016 produced particularly bad results (please find here the report), the representatives of the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), the Association of European Journalists (AEJ), the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF), the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) and Reporters without Borders (RSF) did find a slightly more positive situation at the beginning of 2018.

First of all, the new conservative–liberal (HDZ–HNS) coalition at least has media freedom as a matter of the utmost importance for a member state of the European Union on its agenda. However, “it still has a long way to go“, says Oliver Vujovic of SEEMO.

Pauline Adès-Mével of RSF stressed that it’s not a good sign if a delegation visits a member country of the European Union twice in two years. “Now ranked 74th in RSF’s World Press Freedom Index, Croatia has fallen steadily in the index since joining the European Union in 2013, by a total of ten places in less than five years. It must be hoped that Croatia will not take the same road as Bulgaria, which began falling as soon as it joined the EU in 2007 and now has the worst ranking of any EU member.”

In meetings with the President of Croatia Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović, the Minister of Culture of Croatia Nina Obuljen Koržinek, trade unions, journalists’ associations and professional organisations, journalists, media authorities and ambassadors the criticisms were:

– Various sources claim that biased reporting and internal governance of the public service HRT haven’t really changed since 2016. We did identify several problems and unresolved questions. Due to illnesses in both the HRT management and one of the relevant journalists’ associations, the delegation could not check these concerns on the spot. But there are some encouraging signs, too. By all means, HRT is not only under political pressure, but also under attack by different interest groups demanding to interfere in editorial and management decisions. Boris Bergant of EBU stressed that this shows “a fundamental misunderstanding of the role and function of public service media in the society.” The Minister of Culture promised to improve the legislation.

– The destructive influence of hate speech on society has actually increased. Even though there are no extremist parties in the parliament, the public space seems to be poisoned by daily verbal attacks, including on journalists. “We were quite astonished to find that the Agency for Electronic Media considered all 30 of the hate speech complaints in 2017 as not being hate speech. In 2016 there was one single case that was recognised as such. Croatia desperately needs to deal with the problem hate speech”, says Sophie Albers Ben Chamo of the ECPMF. The delegation urged the President of Croatia Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović to use her position to speak out decisively against incitement and threats of all kinds.

– The delegation praised the work of the Croatian police, as they have recently arrested more persons who physically attacked journalists, compared to the past. However physical attacks, threats and especially online threats against journalists are still a big problem.

– Still there is no media strategy. The Minister of Culture Nina Obuljen Koržinek announced that her ministry is taking care of the law on media as well as the law on electronic media.

– Part of this strategy should also include the support of non-profit media whose state subsidies were completely cut off by the former government. Their situation hasn’t changed since then.

– Also an issue that needs to be examined is media ownership. “In many cases media ownership is not transparent. One prominent person, not active in media business owns a series of media. A foreign group with unknown owners controls a few regional and local media.”, says Otmar Lahodynsky of AEJ.

– Finally, journalists’ working conditions haven’t improved. “Trade unionists are discriminated and dismissed, collective agreements exist only in few media, and they aren’t negotiated collectively. Journalists are forced not to write about some topics, and there are no trade union organisations in numerous private media”, says Marijana Camovic of EFJ.

The preparation and the swift implementation of this visit must be credited to the support of the local partner of the European Federation of Journalists, the Croatian Journalists Assocation (HND).

The delegation will issue a detailed report by the end of February 2018.

Serbia: Fact-finding mission on media freedom and journalists’ rights

0

BELGRADE, 18.01.2018. – This morning, 18 January 2018, the joint Fact-Finding Mission to Serbia on media freedom and journalists’ rights commences by the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ) in cooperation with the South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO) and the International Press Institute (IPI) as well as the EFJ affiliates in Serbia: the Journalists’ Association of Serbia (UNS), the Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia (NUNS), and the Journalists’ Union of Serbia (SINOS).

The two-day mission will meet with government representatives including the President of Serbia Aleksandar Vucic, the Ministry of Culture’s State Secretary, the Assistant Minister for Information and Media and the state secretary for the Ministry of Justice. The delegation will also meet with a range of journalists, including victims of intimidation, and representatives from print and online news outlets, agencies, and public service and private broadcasters. In addition, the Serbian Press Council,  the ombudsman  and international stakeholders will also meet the delegation.

The delegation will be led by EFJ President Mogens Blicher BjerregardThe mission will end with a press conference on Friday at 15.00 by Mogens Blicher Bjerregard, general secretary of SEEMO Oliver Vujovicand Scott Griffen, deputy director at the IPI.

Recommendations for further action will follow the mission.

Ustavni sud usvojio žalbu optuženih za ubistvo Ćuruvije

0

BEOGRAD, 18.01.2018. – Ustavni sud Srbije usvojio je ustavne žalbe dvojice nekadašnjih pripadnika Državne bezbednosti Milana Radonjića i Ratka Romića, optuženih za ubistvo novinara Slavka Ćuruvije, pošto je utvrdio da im je povređeno pravo na ograničeno trajanje pritvora, pa je njihova odbrana zatražila ukidanje pritvora.

Radonjić i Romić u pritvoru su bili tri i po godine, od 13. januara 2014. godine do 6. jula 2017. godine, a prvostepeno suđenje je im je i dalje u toku i nastavljeno je u Specijalnom sudu u Beogradu.

Oni su od jula u kućnom pritvoru sa elektronskim nadzorom. Njihov zajednički branilac, advokat Zora Dobričanin Nikodinović, rekla je danas na suđenju da je u svojoj odluci Ustavni sud konstatovao da je rešenjenima Specijalnog suda iz 2015. godine, kao i rešenjima Apelacionog suda u Beogradu iz 2015. godine protivno Ustavu Srbije okrivljenima produžavan pritvor.

Ćuruvija ubijen sa 14 metaka

Na taj način su im povređena ustavna i zakonska prava na ograničeno trajanje pritvora, rekla je Dobričanin Nikodinović podnoseći ovu odluku sudskom veću kojim presedava sudija Snežana Jovanović kao dokaz. Prethodno je na suđenju trebalo da svedoči Nenad Radović kojeg je predložila odbrana kao pripadnika obezbeđenja Dnevnog telegrafa.

Radović je međutim tvrdio da nikada nije radio kao obezbeđenje Dnevnog telegrafa, već da se bavio autodelovima, navodeći da ne poznaje ni optužene niti da je poznavao Ćuruviju.

Živaljević: Nisam pratio Ćuruviju

Odbrana je negodovala zbog njegovog iskaza, tvrdeći da su do njega došli na osnovu iskaza drugih svedoka i predložila sudu da obavi njihovo suočavanje. Nastavak suđenja zakazan je za mart, kada će se izvoditi pisani dokazi.

Pored Radonjića i Romića, za ubistvo Đuruvije 11. aprila 1999. godine u centru Beograda sudi se i nekadašnjem šefu DB- a Radomiru Markoviću, kao i pripadniku rezervnog sastava DB- a Milanu Kuraku, koji se tereti da je neposredni izvršilac ubistva. Marković u zatvoru služi kaznu od 40 godina zatvora, a Kurak je u bekstvu i za njim je raspisana međunarodna poternica.

Radonjić i Marković se terete za podstrekavanje na teško ubistvo, a Romić i Kurak za teško ubistvo u saizvršilaštvu.

Praćenje prekinuto baš na dan ubistva

Prema optužnici, Ćuruviju je 11. aprila 1999. godine ubio Miroslav Kurak, a saučesnik mu je bio Ratko Romić koji je drškom pištolja udario Ćuruvijinu prijateljicu Branku Prpu u glavu.

Kako se navodi u optužnici, Ćuruvija je ubijen zbog “javnog istupanja u zemlji i inostranstvu i kritike nosilaca političke vlasti, mogućnosti da utiče na javno mnjenje i delovanje opozicionih društvenih snaga, radi očuvanja postojeće vlasti”.

Ubijen je u dvorištu ispred ulaza u zgradu, gde su se nalazile prostorije marketing službe Dnevnog telegrafa

Čeda na saslušanju zbog pretnji novinaru Kurira

0

BEOGRAD, 18.01.2018. – Poziv Policija je načinila službenu belešku, koju će proslediti nadležnom tužilaštvu, odakle će verovatno biti naloženo da se otvori predistražni postupak i sasluša Čedomir Jovanović, lider LDP, saznaje Kurir u MUP-u.

Lider Liberalno-demokratske partije Čedomir Jovanović uskoro će biti pozvan na saslušanje u policiju zbog ugrožavanja sigurnosti novinara Kurira Bobana Karovića, kome je pretio da će mu „polomiti pi*ku” zbog objavljivanja tekstova o njegovim vezama sa „zemunskim klanom”.

– Policija je načinila službenu belešku, koju će proslediti tužilaštvu, odakle će, prema proceduri, biti naloženo da se otvori predistražni postupak i sasluša Jovanović – kazao je za Kurir izvor iz MUP.

Naime, Čedomir Jovanović je u ponedeljak pozvao mobilnim telefonom novinara Kurira i tražio njegovu kućnu adresu da bi, kako je rekao, odmah došao ili „poslao nekog po njega da raščiste neke stvari“, a sve to je začinio konstantnim pretnjama da će novinaru „polomiti pi*ku“.

Lider LDP je pobesneo zbog teksta u Kuriru u kojem je Mihajlo Ulemek, stric Milorada Ulemeka Legije, izjavio da je „Jovanovića video tri-četiri puta u kući Dušana Spasojevića u Šilerovoj”, kao i da su ga ozloglašeni „zemunci” zvali Ciganče. Ulemek je juče ponovio za Kurir da stoji iza svojih reči objavljenih u našem listu.

– Sramno je što je pretio vašem novinaru koji je samo pošteno obavljao svoj posao i preneo moje reči – izjavio je Ulemek.  Lider LDP prekjuče je sramno slagao da broj sa koga su upućene pretnje novinaru Kurira nije njegov, iako postoje brojni dokazi koji potvrđuju suprotno. Kada se u toku dana saznalo za njegove pretnje, Jovanović je, povrh svega, ugasio taj broj!

Veze sa „zemuncima”

O vezama Jovanovića sa „zemunskim klanom“, ali i osuđenim pripadnicima rasformirane Jedinice za specijalne operacije, u javnosti se govori više od 15 godina. Optužbe na njegov račun, od toga da je zapravo bio prvi čovek „zemunaca“ i šef Dušanu Spasojeviću i Miletu Lukoviću, pa do toga da je direktno učestvovao u ubistvu premijera Zorana Đinđića, iznosili su kako osuđivani „zemunci“ i „crvene beretke”, tako i mnogobrojni državni funkcioneri. Uprkos tim svedočenjima, nikada nije do kraja istražena povezanost i eventualna saradnja Jovanovića sa najozloglašenijim kriminalnim klanom na ovim prostorima.

Aleksandar Gajović, državni sekretar za medije – nema opravdanja

Aleksandar Gajović, državni sekretar za medije u Ministarstvu kulture, podsetio je na Zakon o javnom informisanju, u kome se navodi da se „pe sme ugrožavati slobodan protok informacija putem medija, kao ni uređivačka autonomija, a naročito ne vršenjem pritiska, pretnjom, odnosno ucenom urednika, novinara ili izvora informacija”.

– Nikada nisam opravdavao pretnju, nedoličan rečnik ili nekulturno ponašanje, i to ne samo kad je reč o novinarima već prema svakoj osobi bilo koje profesije. Taj i takav stav uvek zastupam, bez obzira na to o kome je reč i čime je pretnja izazvana – naveo je Gajović za Kurir.

Ulemek: Sramno je što je pretio vašem novinaru koji je samo pošteno obavljao svoj posao i preneo moje reči.

Da li će proces digitalizacije preživjeti sve televizije u BiH?

0

SARAJEVO, 18.01.2018.-Da bi jedna televizija emitovala digitalni signal potrebno je da posjeduje studijsku opremu za proizvodnju digitalnog signala, a opremanje jedne televizije osnovnom tehnikom može da košta od 100.000 do 1.000.000 maraka.

Nijedan od zacrtanih rokova za završetak procesa digitalizacije u Bosni i Hercegovini nije do sada ispoštovan. Iako u Ministarstvu prometa i komunikacija BiH kažu da se najviše vremena gubi na žalbene postupke prilikom javnih nabavki, ni stanje na terenu nije nimalo zadovoljavajuće: digitalizacija predstavlja ogroman finansijski zalogaj za niskobudžetne televizije i bit će pravo čudo ukoliko digitalizaciju „prežive“ sve televizije, prije svega one lokalnog karaktera.

Uvođenje digitalne zemaljske televizije u Bosni i Hercegovini, razdoblje prelaska s analognog na digitalno zemaljsko emitovanje i gašenje analogne televizije je obaveza Bosne i Hercegovine koja treba biti urađena u skladu s međunarodnim sporazumima iz te oblasti.

Prva faza Projekta digitalizacije podrazumijeva digitalizaciju prijenosne mreže (linkova) na relaciji Sarajevo – Mostar i Sarajevo – Banja Luka sa digitalizacijom centara za kontribuciju i distribuciju signala u Sarajevu, Mostaru i Banjoj Luci, a nakon toga i uvezivanje pet informativno-tehničkih centara (ITC Istočno Sarajevo, ITC Zenica, ITC Tuzla, ITC Bijeljina i ITC Brčko) u sistem digitalnih veza.

U prvu fazu Projekta spadaju i odašiljači za inicijalno pokrivanje digitalnim signalom gradova Sarajeva, Mostara i Banje Luke, čime se omogućilo testno emitiranje digitalnog signala na području ta tri grada.

Prva faza digitalizacije završena krajem 2016. godine

Prva faza Projekta digitalizacije je službeno okončana 14. oktobra 2016. godine puštanjem zemaljskog radiotelevizijskog digitalnog signala. U ovu fazu je uloženo 7.457.300 KM, od čega 7.057.300 KM za javne RTV servise i 400.000 KM za Radio HB.

Druga faza Projekta digitalizacije obuhvata uvezivanje 11 informativno-tehničkih centara: ITC Bihać, ITC Prijedor, ITC Doboj, ITC Livno, ITC Trebinje, ITC Posušje, ITC Goražde, ITC Orašje, ITC Travnik, ITC Neum i ITC Foča sa pripadajućim linkovskim vezama u integrisan sistem digitalnih veza javnih RTV servisa u Bosni i Hercegovini, kao i unaprjeđenje segmenta mobilnog prijenosa s terena nabavkom Up linka za digitalno satelitsko skupljanje vijesti za potrebe sistema javnog emitiranja u Bosni i Hercegovini. Ta faza obuhvata i osiguranje međunarodnih linkovskih veza sa Hrvatskom, Srbijom, Crnom Gorom i Slovenijom, još je u toku, i za to je namijenjeno 10.400.000 KM.

Prva i Druga faza Projekta digitalizacije podrazumijeva pokrivanje oko 80 posto ukupnog područja Bosne i Hercegovine digitalnim signalom.

Treća faza Projekta digitalizacije predstavlja pokrivanje preostalog dijela područja Bosne i Hercegovine (oko 20 posto) digitalnim signalom, a to bi trebalo biti urađeno odašiljačima male snage tzv. „gap filler“. Takav projekt s procjenom potrebnih sredstava su Ministarstvu dostavili javni RTV servisi i upućen je u redovni postupak usvajanja.

Ministarstvo: Proces usporavaju žalbe prilikom javnih nabavki

Mnogo je faktora koji utječu na brzinu realizacije procesa digitalizacije, ali je činjenica da se najviše vremena izgubi u žalbenim postupcima, tvrde u Ministarstvu, dodajući da se žalbe ulažu u svim fazama javnih nabavki opreme, kako u toku otvorenog poziva, tako i u završnoj fazi procesa javnih nabavki.

„Ministarstvo komunikacija i prometa Bosne i Hercegovine u svojstvu nosioca aktivnosti na realizaciji procesa digitalizacije planira okončanje Druge faze do polovine tekuće godine, pri čemu ističemo da Ministarstvo nema mogućnosti utjecati na vrijeme okončanja žalbenih postupaka, a zatim se nastavlja Treća faza, koja se u najboljoj situaciji može realizovati do kraja tekuće godine“, objašnjavaju.

Navode i da je Ministarstvo osiguralo sve projekte i kompletna potrebna financijska sredstva za realizaciju procesa digitalizacije u standardu DVB-T2 za izgradnju digitalne mreže MUX-a A, kao i da je Vijeće ministara Bosne i Hercegovine, na prijedlog Ministarstva, uvrstilo Projekt digitalizacije u višegodišnje kapitalne investicije Bosne i Hercegovine.

Kada je riječ o samim medijima, da bi jedna televizija emitovala digitalni signal potrebno je da posjeduje studijsku opremu za proizvodnju digitalnog signala. To znači da mora osposobiti vlastite produkcijske kapacitete i proizvedeni signal dopremiti do jednog od tri Headenda (Sarajevo, Banjaluka, Mostar). Signal se dalje prenosi digitalnom mrežom MUX-a A (u narednom razdoblju i MUX-a B) po uvjetima koje propiše Regulatorna agencija za komunikacije i to pojedinačnim dozvolama za svaki medij. Kada se okonča Druga faza Projekta digitalizacije, u svakoj digitalnoj oblasti – a ima ih devet – emitirat će se po 16 programa.

Digitalni signal trenutno emituju četiri televizije

Od 41 televizijske stanice (12 javnih i 29 privatnih) u Bosni i Hercegovini koje su nosioci dozvola Regulatorne agencije za komunikacije za zemaljsko emitovanje, digitalni signal se trenutno emituje tek u tri digitalne oblasti (Sarajevo, Banjaluka i Mostar), a emituju ga tri javna RTV servisa u Bosni i Hercegovini – BHRT, RTRS, RTV FBiH i privatna televizija K3.

Dana 14. oktobra 2016. godine u 12 sati u RTV Domu u Sarajevu i Zgradi RTRS u Banjoj Luci pušten je testni digitalni signal u digitalnim oblastima Sarajeva, Banja Luke i Mostara čime je i zvanično okončana Prva faza digitalizacije. Tog dana započeli su problemi za TV K3 iz Prnjavora.

„RTRS je dobio dozvolu da sa predajnika na Kozari emituje digitalni signal na kanalu 32. Međutim, na broju 32 nalazio naš kanal kojeg smo emitovali analogno putem predajnika Svinjar koji pokriva čitavu našu regiju i sa njega napajamo još šest predajnika. Kada su oni pustili digitalni signal sa Kozare, ugušili su naš signal i mi smo morali stati sa emitovanjem. Nakon toga, obavijestili smo Regulatornu agenciju i ubrzo je stigla njihova Komisija koja je konstatovala da se 2,5 km dalje od predajnika ne vidi naš signal. I od tada je krenula naša ‘borba’ da emitujemo digitalni signal“, objašnjava Branko Dakić, vlasnik televizije K3.

On govori da su 13 mjeseci trajali pregovori između televizije K3, RTRS-a i RAK-a, no da nije pronađeno rješenje. U tom periodu, Regulatorna agencija za komunikacije je čak izrekla i novčanu kaznu u iznosu od 45.000 KM Radio televiziji Republike Srpske (RTRS), kao i novčanu kaznu u iznosu od 15.000 KM generalnom direktoru Radio televizije Republike Srpske, Drašku Milinoviću, kao odgovornom licu, zato što nisu postupili po nalogu Agencije da izvrše priključenje Televizije K3 iz Prnjavora na digitalno zemaljsko emitovanje u Multipleks-u A u digitalnom području Kozara.

„Ni to, međutim, nije pomoglo te smo, na kraju, mi pristali na uslove RTRS-a i napravili s njima ugovor da nas puste u digitalni sistem na Kozari. Taj ugovor RAK ne priznaje, smatraju ga nelegalnim i nama su rekli da nismo bili dužni to potpisati. Međutim, mi smo morali pristati da plaćamo preko 5.000 KM mjesečno kako bismo mogli emitovati naš signal sa Kozare. Radi se o privremenom rješenju do onog konačnog. Međutim, kako stvari idu, ove godine nećemo ništa uspjeti završiti“, kaže Dakić.

Pojedine televizije proces digitalizacije nisu ni započele

Kada je riječ o ostalim televizijama u Bosni i Hercegovini, Sandino Škrbić, direktor RTV Zenica, kaže da u toj medijskoj kući digitalizacija nikada nije pominjana.

„Apsolutno nije razmišljano u tom smjeru s obzirom na to da naše preduzeće trenutno muče neke druge finansijske poteškoće, kao što su tužbe radnika. U tom kontekstu, digitalizacija još nije došla na dnevni red. Mi smo nabavili televizijske enkodere koji će televizijski signal emitovati u HD signalu od 1. marta u kablovskom sistemu Telemacha. Međutim, kada je riječ o zemaljskom emitovanju, nažalost, još ništa nismo poduzimali po tom pitanju. Mi trenutno koristimo resurse RTV BiH i prema njima se i ‘ravnamo’. Kada oni budu spremni za taj korak i mi ćemo se prilagoditi“, ističe Škrbić.

Radiotelevizija Cazin je u početnoj fazi procesa digitalizacije. Trenutno je raspisan javni poziv bankama u vezi kreditnog zaduženja kojeg će finansirati Grad Cazin te vjeruju da će u 2018. godini okončati taj proces.

„Televizija je skupa ‘igračka’. Mislim da će se kroz proces digitalizacije izvršiti određeno filtriranje, pa će opstati samo oni koji ekonomski mogu podnijeti taj izazov. Ipak, vjerujem da će i RTV Cazin pratiti te trendove i da će u budućnosti postati i modernija televizija. Opredjeljenje gradskih vlasti u Cazinu je da televizija nastavi živjeti, ali i razvijati te povećavati broj uposlenih“, kaže Kenan Alagić, direktor televizije.

I Emir Cocalić, direktor privatne televizije KISS također smatra da će digitalizacija „pročešljati“ domaću televizijsku scenu.

„Krajnje je vrijeme da se tržište očisti od svega i svačega. Ljudima u BiH treba ponuditi priliku da gledaju kvalitetne domaće programe, jer je publika sa daljinskim u ruci na svojem kauču nemilosrdna i treba se izboriti za njihovu naklonost. Mi se trudimo da svakim danom radimo i proizvodimo kvalitetniji program, da unaprjeđujemo ono što imamo, a ujedno planiramo kupiti ono što nemamo. Mislim da će 2018. godina biti presudna za nas“, ističe Cocalić.

On kaže da je RTV KISS u fazi predpriprema, odnosno prikupljanja ponuda za opremu koju je potrebno nabaviti, kao i procesu kreiranja strategije u kom pravcu televizija treba krenuti.

„Kao i sve druge televizije, i mi se suočavamo sa konkurencijom kabla, odnosno da gledaoci biraju samo kvalitet i ono što ih interesuje. Mi se ‘takmičimo’ sa televizijama iz susjednih zemalja, ali i tematskim programima koji dolaze iz Evrope i svijeta, i sigurno nije lako. Ipak, smatram da za svakog postoji mjesto i za njega se potrebno izboriti. Dobili smo neke jeftinije ponude za digitalnu opremu u vrijednosti 5.000 KM. Međutim, studijske kamere koje imalo valjaju koštaju 20.000 KM. A morate imati najmanje dvije takve kamere. Zatim dolazi mikseta i brojna druga oprema. Sve u svemu, da se kupi solidna oprema cijena može ići od 100.000 do 1.000.000 KM“, govori Cocalić.

Šta će biti sa televizijama koje ne završe proces digitalizacije?

RTV Visoko signal emituje putem Moje TV, Telemacha i zemaljskih predajnika.

„Nedavno smo nabavili računar koji nam omogućava da ‘izlazimo’ digitalno, a trenutno smo u fazi nabavke digitalnog switcha putem kojeg bi prema kablovskim emiterima mogli slati digitalni signal. Kada je u pitanju zemaljski predajnik, tu nam je sva oprema analogna. Dakle, jednim dijelom smo spremni za digitalizaciju, no bit će potrebno nabaviti još opreme koja je dosta skupa, kako bismo u potpunosti završili taj proces“, govori Esmer Pita, iz Tehničkg odjela RTV Visoko.

Samir Kučanin, šef tehnike u RTV Vogošća, pak, kaže da je ta televizija u potpunosti spremna za digitalno emitovanje signala.

„Kada je riječ o ‘izlazu’ iz našeg studija i režiji, mi odnedavno emitujemo full HD digitalni signal. Dakle, televizija je u potpunosti digitalno spremna za full HD signal. Čitav proces je trajao nešto više od dvije godine. Prvo što smo uradili bila je digitalizacija režije i play-out sistema. Nabavljene su nove miksete, softveri i kamere koje koristimo u studiju. U julu 2017. pustili smo full-HD digitalni signal, a u decembru nabavili i dodatnu digitalnu opremu. Međutim, kablovski operateri još ne preuzimaju naš digitalni signal. Kada je riječ o zemaljskoj mreži, to nije u našoj nadležnosti, mi pretvaramo iz digitalnog u analogni signal i šaljemo putem predajnika. Što se nas tiče, mi smo spremni, potrebno je još samo digitalizovati predajnike“, objašnjava Kučanin.

Emir Cocalić ističe da je digitalizacija isključivo pokušaj da se uvede red na medijskoj sceni putem podizanja standarda i kvaliteta slike i zvuka.

„Ko će preživjeti, a ko ne, vidjet ćemo. Ne mislim da će svi moći ispoštovati što se trenutno traži, mislim da za to jednostavno nema šanse. S druge strane, ko je taj što će ugasiti jednu televiziju, odnosno ugasiti 10 radnih mjesta? Dakle, stvar je mnogo kompleksnija nego što se čini. Mislim da bi država čak trebala pomoći nekim televizijama, prije svega onima lokalnog karaktera, kako bi polako ušle u taj proces. Kako sada stvari stoje, uvjeren sam da proces digitalizacije neće biti završen u narednih pet godina“, smatra Cocalić.

Iz Ministarstva prometa i komunikacija BiH istakli su, pak, da će one medijske kuće koje ne budu tehnički spremne za emitiranje digitalnog signala nastaviti emitiranje analognog signala u skladu s dozvolom koju izdaje Regulatorna agencija za komunikacije, pod uvjetom da analogni signal pojedinačnog medija ne pravi smetnje digitalnom signalu drugih medija.

„Ukoliko se desi taj problem, pojedinačni medij će biti isključen s frekvencije koju koristi taj medij, a Regulatorna agencija za komunikacije će iznaći alternativno rješenje za svaki pojedinačni medij, kako bi emitirali svoj analogni signal“, kazali su za kraj u Ministarstvu.

Izvor: Media.ba