Home Blog Page 83

The Council of Europe recorded ten cases of attacks on journalists after the reaction of the SJ network

0
source: canva

The Council of Europe recorded 23 attacks on journalists and violations of their rights in the region on its Platform for the Protection of Journalism and Safety of Journalists since the beginning of the year. Of these, ten cases were included after the reaction of the SafeJournalists network.

The last in a series of cases from the region included on the Platform is the case from Serbia. Namely, Dragojlo Blagojevic, the editor of the magazine Drvotehnika, received death threats via telephone after the publication of the July issue of the magazine, in which Blagojević’s article about the wood processing industry was published.

Platform for the Protection of Journalism and Safety of Journalists helps the dialogue between the governments and the organisations of journalists, with the aim of stopping violations to press freedom in the member states of the Council of Europe and enabling journalists to exercise their profession without the risk of compromising their safety. The aim of the platform is to improve the protection of journalists, to better respond to threats and violence against media professionals and to encourage early warning mechanisms and response capacities within the Council of Europe.

Since 2015, the Platform has facilitated the collection and dissemination of information on serious concerns for media freedom and the safety of journalists in Council of Europe member states, as guaranteed by Art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The platform also enables the Council of Europe to be alerted in a more systematic way about the situation regarding media freedom in the member states and to take timely and coordinated actions if necessary.

We remind you that the SafeJournalists network reacts in cases of threats to the life and body of journalists, physical attacks, murder of journalists, as well as in exceptional situations when all members of the network agree that a joint reaction is necessary. The network informs all relevant European institutions and institutions in member countries of the network about the cases in which it reacts, which concern media rights and freedoms. 

The SafeJournalists platform consists of journalist associations and media unions from the countries of the Western Balkans, namely Independent Journalists Association of Serbia (IJAS), Association of BH Journalists (BHJ), Croatian Journalists Association (CJA), Association of Journalists of Kosovo (AJK), Association of Journalists of Macedonia (AJM) and the Trade Union of Media of Montenegro (TUMM). 

 

All cases found on the Platform after the SafeJournalists network warning: 

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637504;globalSearch=false 

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637047;globalSearch=false 

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637704;globalSearch=false 

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637566;globalSearch=false

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637182;globalSearch=false 

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637517;globalSearch=false 

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637171;globalSearch=false 

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637349;globalSearch=false 

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637458;globalSearch=false

https://fom.coe.int/en/alerte/detail/107637797;globalSearch=false 

 

Source: SafeJournalists/Anka Kovačević

 

Coalition for media freedom: The pressure on Jelena Zoric must stop

0

Former State Secretary in the Ministry of Internal Affairs Dijana Hrkalovic, who was accused of abuse of official position, in yesterday’s guest appearance on the show “Cirilica” (Cyrillic) on Happy Television, used the opportunity to present a series of incorrect information about BIRN journalist and weekly magazine Vreme (Time) Jelena Zoric and sent her threats mentioning her brother.

“This Jelena Zoric, whose confession we finally got a few days ago, for whom Vlada Gajic from the People’s Party says that Sasa Drecun is her source ofinformation. I mean, everyone is saying that she has a very close relationship with him. I hear her brother saying that she had a problem with the newsroom of the television where she previously worked because she covered up the correspondence between Drecun and a criminal, most likely Korac, which arrived at that newsroom’s email. Watch out, she hid it from her editors! What is it called? Selective investigative journalism, or what?”

The performance of Dijana Hrkalovic is a continuation of putting pressure on Jelena Zoric. Namely, after a guest appearance in “Pregled dana” (Overview of the day) on NewsMax Adria a few days ago, Zoric found herself the target of opposition representatives, who accused her of “selling out” because she stated that “there is no Andrej Vucic” in the Jovanjic affair.

The Coalition for Media Freedom sees Dijana Hrkalovic’s latest appearance as an attempt to discredit the multi-awarded journalist with untruths, since Jelena Zoric made a report on the controversial correspondence for N1 television, where she worked at the time, while the mention of her family members can only be for the purpose of threats and intimidation.

Dijana Hrkalovic used the opportunity to label independent media and journalists in her earlier guest appearances in pro-regime media, so N1, Nova, Danas, as well as Vukasin Obradovic have already been targeted by her.

The Coalition for Media Freedom strongly condemns the perfidious threats directed at Jelena Zoric as well as the labeling of journalists by Dijana Hrkalovic. Such performances can only further threaten the safety of independent journalists, against whom a campaign has been conducted by the authorities and media sympathetic to them for years.

Also, we call on all political actors to stop putting pressure on the media and journalists, and the police to protect them, so that they can do their job professionally and without fear.

The Coalition for Media Freedom consists of the Association of Media, the Association of Online Media (AOM), the Independent Association of Journalists of Vojvodina (NDNV), the Independent Journalists Association of Serbia (NUNS), the Business Association of the Association of Local and Independent Media “Local Press” and the Slavko Curuvija Foundation.

For media, media and production services more almost 3.5 million EUR

0
PHOTO: Pixabay.com

Podgorica, 25.07.2022. – In Montenegro, 192 public sector bodies spent EUR 3,426,183 ,on media, media and production services last year, according to the Center for Civic Education (CGO).

From that non-governmental organization, they said that Pobjeda, Vijesti and Dan received the most from public funds for print media, from television stations Radio Television Nikšić, Television Vijesti and Radio Television Montenegro, and among radio stations Radio Tivat, Radio Kotor and Radio Antena M.

“Of the portals and agencies, Portal Analitika, Portal Vijesti and the information-agency portal Mina received the most funds, on different grounds,” according to data obtained by CGO for the purposes of reports on financial transactions from the public sector for media and media-production companies, “Equal opportunities for the media in Montenegro – 2021”.

CGO development coordinator Damir Nikocevic explained that the research into various forms of money transfers from public funds to the media, media agencies and production houses and related entities for the provision of various media services was conducted from February 23 to June 8, and included 621 public sector bodies.

Nikocevic said that the data was collected based on responses to requests for free access to information, as well as from available documents of competent authorities, for the period from January 1 to December 31 last year.

“Financing of the media from public funds is solidly regulated through the Media Act, which was contributed to by the multi-year efforts of the CGO, which has been monitoring these cash flows since 2012 and pointing out the consequences of the collapse of the media market, which is directly related to how favorable or critical media outlets report on the government’s activities,” said Nikocevic.

He said that the most money for media and related services last year was allocated by local governments – EUR 1,387,518.40, followed by public companies – EUR 1,139,791.92, while the least for these purposes was spent by the judiciary, i.e. EUR 3,646.94.

Nikocevic said that of the ministries, the Ministry of Public Administration, Digital Society and Media allocated the most money – EUR 374,823.29 (dominantly through two public tenders intended for the media), and the Ministry of Internal Affairs the least, EUR 499.12.

He said that it is interesting that the Ministry of Finance and Social Welfare, while it was headed by Milojko Spajic, advertised on Radio Television of Serbia from November 1 to 11 last year, allocating 4,950.70 euros for it. Nikocevic pointed out that it is not clear from the submitted invoices and contracts why the Ministry would advertise at the public service of another country.

He pointed out that last year money was paid to unregistered newspapers from certain public sector bodies.

“Thus, on October 5, 2021, the public company Rudnik Uglja paid the unregistered newspaper IN4S EUR 500 in one-time aid, and the Electric Power Company of Montenegro (EPCG) paid EUR 600 per month, excluding VAT, to that portal for publishing the banner from November 1, 2021,” he explained. is Nikocevic.

According to him, RTCG had planned total revenues of EUR 17,786,900 for last year, of which EUR 13,821,900 came from the budget of Montenegro.

Nikocevic said that total expenditures were projected at EUR 17,781,900, of which EUR 9,197,000 or 51.72 percent were projected for salaries.

“This is followed by the costs of the production and broadcasting of the program in more than twice the amount of 4,014,045 euros or 24.29 percent”, said Nikocevic.

He said that last year RTCG also planned marketing revenues of EUR 1,320,000, which is almost EUR 100,000 less than in 2020, or about EUR 130,000 less than in 2019.

Nikocevic said that RTCG recorded a noticeable increase in expenses in relation to salaries and a decrease in investment in the costs of production and broadcasting of programs.

“This increases the criticism of the public about the excessive number of employees in RTCG, but also a part of the employees who do not come to work and use sick leave for a long period of time,” said Nikocevic.

He stated that RTCG’s financial report for last year is not yet publicly available, it is not on the official website of the Public Service, which, he believes, indicates the worrying lack of transparency of the public broadcaster, in which the state directly invests close to 14 million euros per year.

Nikocevic said that last year print media received the following: Pobjeda – EUR 317,328.01, Vijesti – EUR 157,689.81, Dan – EUR 121,852.81, Dnevne novine – EUR 63,599.31 and Monitor – EUR 25,389.97.

According to him, the largest amount of funds for television received by the RTV Niksic – EUR 688,271.75.

“In second place in terms of income is Vijesti television, which received EUR 75,281.76 from public funds, on various grounds, followed by RTCG with EUR 44,653.93, then TV Boin with EUR 41,817.60, and RTV Pljevlja with EUR 19,666.04”, said Nikocevic.

He said that among the radio broadcasters, the biggest users of public funds were Radio Tivat with EUR 210,060.50, Radio Kotor with EUR 180,959.99, then Antena M with EUR 27,199.50, Radio Bar with EUR 3,645.25, and Radio Petnjica – Talas Bihora with a revenue of 3,440 EUR.

Nikocevic pointed out that the unequal attitude of local governments is noticeable when it comes to the transparency of payments toward local public broadcasters.

“A part of the local governments (Nikšić, Kotor and Tivat) submitted information about the allocated funds to the local public broadcasters for regular functioning, so those three municipalities dominated the review of spending for these purposes only because there is no available data for other municipalities which have large costs on this basis (e.g. Podgorica, Herceg Novi, Budva, etc.)”, said Nikocevic.

Nikocevic said that portals have a growing share in the financial transactions of public sector bodies in 2021.

“The most funds, according to different bases, were received by: Portal Analitika – EUR 38,758.26, then Portal Vijesti – EUR 27,810.42, the information and service portal of the MINA agency – EUR 23,378.67, followed by the MNE handball portal – EUR 21,415, then the CdM portal – EUR 19,782”, said Nikocevic.

He stated that Direct Media DOO – EUR 491,790.80, Archimede – EUR 69,779.20, Ninamedia Clipping – EUR 47,242.55, Media biro – EUR 37,965.35 received the most funds from public funds from marketing, media agencies and production companies, Rabbit Records – EUR 30,734.00 and Represent Communications – EUR 30,119.04.

“The two largest users of funds based on media and advertising services by legal entities and individuals who received funds for the provision of other services, which do not fall into any of the categories mentioned above, were DMS Development – EUR 46,738.02 and the public research agency opinions of DeFacto Consultancy – EUR 20,560.32”, said Nikocevic.

He pointed out that the data of the relevant Ministry, which published its report for the first time at the end of June this year, in accordance with the new legal obligation, give approximate figures.

Nikocevic said that a significant part of the data of the Ministry and the CGO match, and that the variations can be attributed to a different percentage of responses from public sector bodies.

“Given that there is a legal norm that stipulates the obligation of public sector bodies to publish on their website, by March 31 of the current year for the previous year, records of payments to the media based on advertising and other contracted services, the CGO expects the Ministry of Culture and Media takes a more decisive position in this part”, Nikocevic pointed out.

He added that it is necessary to establish a greater degree of discipline in the public sector when it comes to reporting on cash flows for the needs of the media and related media services.

“On several occasions, the granting of state aid to the media has opened up a lot of questions, so it is necessary to establish a systematized and publicly available review of state aid to the media, and the Ministry of Culture and Media, as well as the Agency for the Protection of Competition, can do the most in this direction.”

CGO, as he said, supports the initiative of the Media Directorate that public sector bodies should not advertise on unregistered media that do not respect the laws of the state of Montenegro.

Nikocevic said that, accordingly, the CGO expects quick legal changes in that direction.

“It is important to emphasize the significant progress when it comes to compliance with the Law on Free Access to Information by public administration bodies, noting that this included a great effort by the CGO research team through additional calls, emergencies and appeals,” said Nikocevic.

He said that out of 621 public sector bodies to which a request for free access to information was sent, 613 bodies, or 98.71 percent, provided answers to CGO researchers.

Nikocevic said that eight bodies are on the “black list” of non-transparent ones that, despite numerous emergencies and complaints, violated the provisions of the Law on Free Access to Information and never responded.

“These are the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, Revenue and Customs Administration, Airports of Montenegro, ‘Plantaze’, Aviation Association of Montenegro, Judo Association of Montenegro”, concluded Nikočević.

(Source: Agency Mina)

Research by BH Journalists: What journalists think and how much they know about the judiciary

0

SARAJEVO, 26.07.2022. – The perception of the journalism community in Bosnia and Herzegovina about the transparency and communications of the judiciary is extremely negative, and the judiciary has so far not made enough efforts to improve cooperation with the media. On the other hand, journalists in some cases admit that they do not know enough about certain judicial topics, rules and issues and that they are not sufficiently knowledgeable about judicial topics, showed the results of the research by BH Journalists Association, which were presented today in Sarajevo.

The research was conducted on a sample of 200 journalists from the entire country. The main goal was to gain insight into the complex issue of the relationship between the media and the judiciary, and to provide recommendations for strengthening dialogue and cooperation between journalists, judges, prosecutors and judicial authorities.

“This research has shown many sore points in the relationship between the media and the judiciary. Our prosecutor’s offices and courts often act according to the principle that the media should be kept as far as possible from the specific case or topic. The experiences of many journalists are such that if you need some information from judicial institutions and you work in the daily newsroom, don’t even try”, said Marko Divkovic, president of the BH Journalists Association.

As stated by the research author Assoc. Ph.D. Amer Dzihana, the interviewees-journalists believe that they know the most about the ethical principles of reporting, and the least about the legal procedure carried out in criminal cases. A small number of respondents received some type of training in reporting on the justice system in the past five years. In general, journalists believe that there is a need for any type of education about judiciary and the greatest interest was expressed in training about legal rules and limitations in covering different stages of the court process.

“There are two basic theses: the first, which comes from journalistic sources, is that the judiciary is insufficiently transparent and prevents free journalistic work. Access to hearing records and other important information is difficult. Another is the claim of representatives of the judiciary that unprofessional and often sensationalistic journalistic reporting on court proceedings and the judiciary leads to the collapse of public trust in the judiciary”, Dzihana said.

Speaking about the importance of communication between the media and the judiciary, Davor Trlin from the Center for the Education of Judges and Prosecutors in FBiH pointed out that investigative journalists often do what even prosecutors fail to do in exposing certain criminal acts.

“The results of this research generally coincide with what we have seen through our trainings. I believe that the right solution would be trainings that will be attended jointly by holders of judicial positions and journalists, in order to establish better cooperation mechanisms between these two branches”, said Trlin.

Journalist of online magazine Žurnal Zinaida Djelilovic cited as a positive example the Sarajevo Canton Prosecutor’s Office, which recently appointed a person for contact with the media.

“The results of this research show a negative perception of journalists when it comes to the judiciary. I can partially agree with that, but I don’t think that the judiciary is not trying to improve it. For example, we currently have a very good network of spokespersons in the judiciary who are really trying to improve cooperation with the media. Therefore, there is this intention to reduce the gap between the media and the judiciary”, stated Djelilovic.

The research was conducted within the framework of the three-year project “Strengthening media freedom in Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia and Serbia”, which is financed by the MATRA program of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. The project will be implemented by a consortium consisting of the Dutch Helsinki Committee and the organization Free Press Unlimited, and is developed in cooperation with local partner organizations. The goal of the project is to contribute to the creation of an environment in which freedom of media and expression is respected without fear or pressure. The project focuses in particular on building the capacity of journalists, as well as actors in the judicial sector, with the aim of developing a more effective response to cases of intimidation and threats to journalists and media workers.

SNS official threatens journalist Vuk Cvijic and independent media in Serbia

0
photo: N1

The official of the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), Vladimir Djukanovic, sent threats via Twitter to the journalist of the NIN weekly, Vuk Cvijic, after he was a guest on Nova S TV, where he spoke about the connection of the head of state with the “Jovanjica” case, when the largest illegal marijuana plantation in Europe was discovered.

Djukanović wrote on his Twitter profile: “The only thing that is clear is that you will answer for every lie you wrote and told, Cvijic. Fear in your eyes can be seen.”

 

source: Screenshot

 

Cvijic stated that he is not afraid of the threats that the official of the Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) Vladimir Djukanovic has been sending to him and other investigative journalists on Twitter lately.

He told the Beta agency that the threats he receives from SNS officials are a “signpost” for him to continue working on uncovering criminal affairs under the direction of the current government.

“When they get excited, it means I did something good,” Cvijic said.

The collegium of the weekly magazine NIN strongly condemned the threats sent by the high-ranking SNS official Vladimir Djukanovic via social networks to the NIN journalist Vuk Cvijic because of his investigative texts and public appearances, in which he presents facts about the connection of people from the top of the government to crime without compromise or restraint.

In the press release, the Collegium reminds that Djukanovic is the legal representative of Predrag Koluvija, the first accused in the “Jovanjica” affair, and the former State Secretary of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Dijana Hrkalovic, and appeals to all competent authorities to do everything to stop unsubstantiated attacks and pressures on all professional journalists in Serbia.

The collegium of the weekly magazine NIN stands behind all articles by Vuk Cvijic published in the NIN, for which he received recognition from both the UNS and NUNS (IJAS), and encourages other journalists to continue to bravely investigate all affairs, taking into account only the truth, public interest and standards of professional journalism .

After that, Djukanovic wrote again on his Twitter account that he will continue to label independent journalists as “liars”.

 

source: screenshot

Source: Beta/Fonet/IJAS

Urgently stop violence and intimidation, institutions belong to citizens

0
Source: N1

Civil society organizations gathered around the “Three Freedoms” Platform urgently request the MUP(The Ministry of Internal Affairs) to protect the citizens who were exposed to private security attacks in Novi Sad today, as well as to stop the application of repressive measures and excessive force by MUP members. Furthermore, we demand that activists be provided with the unhindered right to freedom of assembly and expression and participation in decision-making. The Assembly of the City of Novi Sad must respect the democratic right of interested citizens to attend the session where the General Urban Plan is adopted.

In the photos and videos that are publicly available on media portals and social networks, it is possible to see how members of private security forcefully push and knock down the demonstrators, and the moment in which they forcefully pushed away one activist who fell to the ground was also recorded. After the arrival of the police, there was a conflict with the demonstrators, and a video is available of the arrest of one of the activists with the excessive use of force, as is suspected, by the plainclothes police.

We demand that the competent institutions immediately initiate proceedings against the responsible members of the police and private security, in order to determine whether there was an excessive use of force against the gathered citizens.

We remind that for months the citizens of Novi Sad warned about the bad solutions provided by the proposal of the new General Urban Plan of Novi Sad, and the competent institutions rejected more than 10,000 objections from the citizens. Also, we remind of the reaction of the “Three Freedoms” Platform, from March 2022, on the occasion of the criminal prosecution of three activists of the Youth Student Action (OSA) who interrupted the debate on the General Urban Plan of the city of Novi Sad, which judged that the citizens were forced to resort to extra-institutional mechanisms in cases when institutions turn a deaf ear to the problems of citizens and prevent them from influencing the decision-making that concerns them.

 

In front of the “Three Freedoms” Platform:

Civic initiatives

Youth Initiative for Human Rights (YIHR Serbia)

A11- Initiative for economic and social rights

Belgrade Center for Human Rights

CRTA

Slavko Curuvija Foundation

New optimism

Center for Practical Politics

Helsinki Committee for Human Rights

Belgrade Center for Security Policy

Center for cultural decontamination

Committee of Lawyers for Human Rights – YUCOM

IJAS – Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia

 

Gazetaret ukrainase fillojnë kursin e Gjuhës Shqipe

0

Iryna Synelnyk, Lyudmila Makey, Maryna Zhyvotkova, Oksana Chykanch dhe Viktoriia Kaidash, sot, kanë filluar kursin e Gjuhës Shqipe.

Kursi është paraparë në programin “Journalists in Residence – Kosovo”, dhe për qëllim ka integrimin e kolegeve ukrainase në Kosovë.

Gazetaret së bashku me ligjëruesen, Mirishahe Haziraj, për dy orë në javë do të mësojnë fillimisht elementet bazike të shqipes, për të kaluar më vonë në faza tjera.

Kursi i Gjuhës Shqipe është mundësuar nga organizata humanitare Jesuit Refugee Service – JRS, e cila njëherësh në baza mujore u siguron pako ushqimore dhe higjienike gazetareve nga Ukraina.

Programi “Journalists in Residence – Kosovo”, është inicuar nga European Centre for Press and Media Freedom ECPMF dhe European Federation of Journalists – EFJ, mbështetet financiarisht nga Qeveria e Republikës së Kosovës. Teksa, është duke u zbatuar nga Asociacioni i Gazetarëve të Kosovës, në bashkëpunim të ngushtë me ECPMF-në, ku deri më tani kanë strehuar tetë gazetarë.

Serbian female investigative journalists continue to face growing harassment

0
Photo: Pixabay

A small group of American journalism students visited the country to examine the state of press freedoms there

This story was produced as part of Washington State University’s Backpack Journalism Program. In March, four students and professor Alison Boggs spent a week in Serbia visiting multiple independent journalism outlets, media watchdog organizations, research agencies, and journalism professors and students to understand the current state of press freedoms in that country.

BELGRADE, SERBIA — In April 2020, Serbian journalist Ana Lalic learned of a shortage of protective equipment for hospital staff working in COVID-19 wards. Despite the Serbian government’s restrictions on reporting on COVID-19, Lalic felt she had to inform the public.

“We were concerned about the possibility of doctors and nurses contracting the virus, which would have a greater effect as there will be no one to treat the public,” said Lalic, a veteran journalist.

Two hours after her article was published, the hospital denied her reporting. That night, six police officers showed up at her door with an arrest warrant, Lalic said. She was charged with “disseminating false information and causing panic,” her cell phone and laptop were seized, and authorities took her into custody. She was released two days later and the charges were eventually dropped, she said.

Lalic’s story is one of many that demonstrate the challenges of working in a country where independent journalists are harassed and subjected to surveillance and smear campaigns, including online verbal insults, death threats and property crimes. In April, Reporters Without Borders urged Serbian officials to strengthen press freedom and protect journalists from frivolous lawsuits. Within the country, the number of physical and verbal attacks on journalists has grown dramatically in recent years, according to the Independent Journalists Association of Serbia, which promotes a free and independent press.

Many of those attacks focus on the country’s female journalists, who often lead independent investigative news outlets.

“These journalists are at the forefront of the struggle for media freedoms here in Serbia,” said Igor Ispanovic, media support officer and project manager for media at the Independent Journalists Association of Vojvodina. “But even when they experience harassment, I think they’re doing brilliant in managing the ways to repel it, and actually go beyond or transcend it, and not respond in a similar manner.”

In the 1990s, the government of Serbia, a landlocked country in southeastern and central Europe, controlled state radio and television, battling against a small group of independent news outlets and journalists. Today, pro-government media outlets receive the bulk of government funding that dominates the Serbia press scene, disseminating mis- and disinformation to support the government’s political agenda, according to multiple interviews conducted this spring with independent journalists and press activists.

The ruling Serbian Progressive Party has gradually undermined political rights and civil liberties, according to a 2022 report by Freedom House, a nonprofit think tank based in Washington, D.C. The report found that independent media, opposition groups, and civil society organizations are increasingly under attack.

Much of the funding for independent media groups in Serbia is foreign aid from Western Europe or the United States, such as grants from the State Department, USAID, nongovernmental organizations that support press freedom or international foundations. That funding has led to accusations that independent journalists are foreign mercenaries and domestic terrorists, numerous journalists said.

Pro-government tabloids and government officials have also created an environment where smear campaigns and verbal harassment against journalists have become common, resulting in psychological issues such as fear, anxiety and stress for these reporters.

For Lalic, the arrest was just the beginning of the psychological distress that was to come. Although the charges against her were dropped, Lalic said she was vilified as a traitor and hater of the country by the president and prime minister.

“I was all over the tabloid newspapers,” said Lalic. “I received different threats. And one night, somebody entered my parking lot and cut the tires on my car.”

In 2017, investigative reporter Dragana Peco of Crime and Corruption Reporting Network (or KRIK), an independent investigative portal in Serbia, was targeted when her apartment was burglarized and ransacked. The culprit went through her belongings without taking anything, despite the presence of valuable items. She reported the crime, but no one was caught, and the case was closed.

In a separate incident in June 2020, Bojana Pavlovic, another female journalist at KRIK, was stopped and physically attacked in the street by men in civilian clothing after she took photos of the president’s son, Danilo Vucic. According to an article by KRIK, the son was in a coffee shop sitting in the company of a group known for criminal activities. Her attackers claimed to be police officers. They harassed her, took her phone and instructed her to delete the photos. KRIK reported her attack and demanded an investigation, but no one was ever charged.

“We have this corrupt government that starts campaigns against us,” said Marija Vucic, a journalist and fact-checker at KRIK. “They have many journalists on their side. So it’s confusing the journalism environment, and all that makes people not believe or appreciate us.”

The media landscape in Serbia is “disastrous,” Lalic said. It is deeply polarized with the presence of pro-government media and independent outlets. Critical or unflattering reporting on the government or its officials leads to an attack by pro-government media outlets, Vucic said.

The Serbian government plays a substantial role and influence in the media business, according to a report by Reporters Without Borders from 2017, the most recent year the information was available. Not only do most media outlets rely on government funding, but the government also applies pressure to the media market by selectively enforcing tax laws, sometimes freezing the bank accounts of newspapers critical of the government.

This spring, Reporters Without Borders urged elected officials to create policies that would promote press freedom and protect journalists. Reporters Without Borders released the report on the anniversary of the assassination of investigative journalist Slavko Curuvija. It submitted 10 recommendations to the elected officials, including one that calls for distributing government funds to the media in a fair and equitable manner.

On a local level, nearly 99% of the media are connected to the government because they depend on local budgets for survival, according to Vucic.

Vucic herself is no stranger to online attacks, including death threats on social media.

“When I work on some investigation, I don’t feel so safe,” Vucic said. “For example, in those few weeks of working and after publishing, I feel like maybe I’m truly endangered. I’m always suspicious of someone following me or if I’m under some surveillance.”

Lalic sees these attacks as a means for the government to humiliate and shame female journalists for working in a traditionally male profession.

Vucic of KRIK is more blunt. She said that when female journalists publish something critical, they are demeaned on social media as “sluts.”

“When you attack a female journalist, you are going to say that she is a whore, she’s stupid, a garbage, or that she looks like a horse,” Vucic said.

KRIK has established a fund for journalists to receive counseling for one or two months. The Independent Journalists Association of Vojvodina in Novi Sad also provides free psychological support to its members based on funds received through grants.

In a 2020 survey among female journalists conducted by the Independent Journalists Association of Serbia, more than 36% of respondents reported that they have been victims of online threats or have “had their safety at risk in a similar way” in the last five years. In many of those cases, “there has been sexual harassment and danger to safety and life.”

Such attacks are sometimes extended to their families. In 2019, a man pleaded guilty to making online death threats against a female journalist, Tatjana Vojtehovski, and her daughter, according to an article by the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network. He was sentenced to eight months of house arrest.

Vojtehovski’s case is one of the very few that get attention as most of these reported harassments generally go unpunished, giving more leeway to perpetrators of such crimes. Attacks on female journalists are often not reported.

Ispanovic said because female journalists are increasingly leading investigative work, they often experience attacks much more than their male counterparts. When government officials notice growing opposition, they are more likely to become more active in their harassment of journalists, Ispanovic said.

“There’s this sort of patronizing aspect to the harassment,” he said. “You have men who are in positions of power within the established structure of the system, while on the other hand, most journalists that do investigative work and are at the forefront are women.”

As for Lalic, she vowed to continue to do what she loves, but has made changes to ensure her safety. For the past two years, she has hired security guards who accompany her everywhere. She now always carries a panic taser and avoids walking alone.

“Investigative journalists are women in Serbia nowadays. And that’s something that I’m really proud of,” Lalic said. “It’s better to be paranoid when you know that we live in a society where physical violence is excused and welcomed unsolicited in some cases.”

IJAS: Lav Pajkic should apologize for comparing journalists to Ustashas

0

Member of Parliament from the list of the Serbian Progressive Party, Lav Grigorije Pajkic, compared media Danas, N1 and Nova.rs with the camp leaders in Jasenovac on social networks. The reason for comparing the newsrooms and journalists of these media houses with the Ustasha (members of Croatian fascist and nationalist organizations) were the columns dedicated to the topic of Jasenovac.

 

On his Instagram account, Pajkić shared an invitation from the Danas editorial office to young people to apply to their journalism school, illustrating it with a photo from the movie Dara from Jasenovac, featuring the Ustashas. Below, he marked the newsrooms of Danas, N1 and Nova, with the accompanying text “The views of Danas columnists on the issue of banning our president from visiting Jasenovac motivated me to describe to the students of their school what an average lecture would look like…”

 

The Independent Journalists Association of Serbia sees this case as a continuation of the campaign against freedom of speech and free journalism in Serbia.

 

We call on MP Lav Grigori Pajkic to apologize for the misuse and relativization of one of the most terrible sufferings of the Serbian people, as well as for comparing journalists and the media with murderers. The justification for his action can only be the fact that he was not aware of the weight of the comparison. Therefore, we advise him to educate himself in the future before using similar terms in his speeches. 

 

The last case is another obvious example where it can be seen that attacks, labeling and spreading hatred towards independent journalists are coming, first of all, from the ruling structures in the country. The goal of these performances is nothing more than spreading tensions and deepening divisions in the entire society, in order to mask the existential problems of citizens.

 

IJAS again calls on all state officials to stop stigmatizing journalists when they present facts about their work and to understand constructive criticism in the right way and use it for the purpose of improving their own work, which must be in the public interest of all citizens of Serbia.

 

Independent Journalists Association of Serbia

July 20, 2022